| Literature DB >> 20431805 |
Shalini Adiga1, K L Bairy, A Meharban, I S R Punita.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Trichosanthes dioica is used to treat diabetes mellitus, epilepsy, alopecia, and skin disease in folklore medicine. The leaf extract of the plant is used in diabetes mellitus but there have been no scientific studies reported. AIMS: To study the effect of Trichosanthes dioica on serum glucose level in glucose loaded, normal and hyperglycemic rats. SETTINGS: Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Karnataka, India.Entities:
Keywords: Diabetic rats; Trichosanthes dioica; hypoglycemic effect
Year: 2010 PMID: 20431805 PMCID: PMC2859283 DOI: 10.4103/0973-3930.60011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries ISSN: 1998-3832
Effect of aqueous extract from Trichosanthes dioica on blood glucose levels in glucose loaded hyperglycemic (OGTT) rats
| Groups (n) | Dose (mg/kg) | Fasting blood sugar in mg/dl | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 min | 30 min | 60 min | 120 min | ||
| Control | - | 72.25 ± 6.52 | 116.50 ± 4.09 | 114.25 ± 2.78 | 105.75 ± 5.39 |
| Aqueous extract | 800 | 74.50 ± 3.57 | 83.00 ± 6.40 | 91.50 ± 2.90 | 81.00 ± 5.68 |
| Aqueous extract | 1600 | 90.75 ± 6.62 | 98.75 ± 2.75 | 91.25 ± 3.06 | 92.75 ± 2.42 |
| Glibenclamide | 0.5 | 76.25 ± 4.17 | 103.25 ± 1.60 | 88.50 ± 2.36 | 81.00 ± 3.31 |
One way ANOVA F 12.2, 16.98, 7.11; df 3, 12 3, 12 3, 12; P < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05. Values expressed as mean ± S.E.M; n = 6 in each group;
P < 0.05 significant as compared to control, df = 3, 12
Effect of single dose administration of Trichosanthes dioica aqueous extract on blood glucose levels in normal rats
| Groups (n) | Dose (mg/kg) | Fasting blood sugar in mg/dl | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 min | 30 min | 60 min | 120 min | ||
| Control | - | 65.50 ± 2.02 | 64.50 ± 1.65 | 72.25 ± 3.94 | 80.00 ± 4.56 |
| Aqueous extract | 800 | 63.00 ± 2.67 | 60.00 ± 2.94 | 58.50 ± 3.17 | 61.50 ± 2.21 |
| Aqueous extract | 1600 | 62.00 ± 2.51 | 49.50 ± 2.10 | 51.50 ± 1.19 | 62.00 ± 1.08 |
| Glibenclamide | 0.5 | 66.00 ± 3.10 | 54.00 ± 2.16 | 52.25 ± 2.39 | 66.75 ± 2.68 |
One way ANOVA F 8.4, 11.2, 8.7; df 3,12 3,12 3,12; P < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05. Values expressed as Mean ± S.E.M; n = 6 in each group;
P < 0.05 significant as compared to control, df = 3, 12
Effect of repeated administration of Trichosanthes dioica aqueous extract on blood glucose levels in normal rats
| Groups (n) | Dose (mg/kg) | Fasting blood sugar (FBS) in mg/dl | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | Day 7 | Day 15 | Day 30 | ||
| Control | - | 65.50 ± 2.02 | 76.00 ± 4.41 | 75.50 ± 3.79 | 81.75 ± 4.11 |
| Aqueous extract | 800 | 63.00 ± 2.67 | 56.25 ± 2.17 | 50.25 ± 2.78 | 62.00 ± 2.16 |
| Aqueous extract | 1600 | 62.00 ± 2.51 | 56.50 ± 1.70 | 51.75 ± 1.18 | 66.75 ± 1.18 |
| Glibenclamide | 0.5 | 66.00 ± 3.16 | 60.75 ± 1.49 | 55.75 ± 1.70 | 68.50 ± 1.32 |
One way ANOVA F 18.8, 20.6, 11.5; df 3,12 3,12 3,12; P < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05. Values expressed as Mean ± S.E.M; n = 6 in each group;
P < 0.05;
P < 0.001 significant as compared to control, df = 3, 12
Effect of repeated administration of Trichosanthes dioica aqueous extract on blood glucose levels in diabetic rats
| Groups (n) | Dose (mg/kg) | Fasting blood suga (FBS) in mg/dl | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | Day 7 | Day 15 | ||
| Control | - | 259.33 ± 3.99 | 262.33 ± 2.81 | 286.50 ± 1.91 |
| Aqueous extract | 800 | 251.00 ± 2.16 | 213.33 ± 2.57 | 177.66 ± 4.21 |
| Aqueous extract | 1600 | 251.66 ± 3.81 | 218.16 ± 3.68 | 172.33 ± 2.91 |
| Glibenclamide | 0.5 | 255.83 ± 2.07 | 184.33 ± 5.53 | 113.66 ± 5.35 |
One way ANOVA F 70.59, 354.17; df 3,20 3,20; P < 0.001 < 0.001. Values expressed as Mean ± S.E.M, n = 6 in each group;
P < 0.001 significant as compared to control, df = 3, 20
Body weight changes in diabetic treated rats
| Groups (n) | Dose (mg/kg) | Day 0 | Day 7 | Day 15 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | - | 219.83 ± 2.85 | 201.83 ± 2.35 | 183.83 ± 2.28 |
| Aqueous extract | 800 | 215.33 ± 3.71 | 205.00 ± 3.37 | 194.33 ± 2.26 |
| Aqueous extract | 1600 | 213.66 ± 3.84 | 204.50 ± 3.95 | 196.50 ± 2.41 |
| Glibenclamide | 0.5 | 209.66 ± 3.72 | 201.83 ± 3.91 | 198.00 ± 1.87 |
One way ANOVA F 0.24, 8.3; df 3, 20 3, 20; P < 0.86 < 0.001. Values expressed as Mean ± S.E.M, n = 6 in each group;
Significant as compared to control, df = 3, 20
Food intake in diabetic treated rats
| Groups (n) | Dose (mg/kg) | Food intak (g/rat/week) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | Week 1 | Week 2 | ||
| Control | - | 16.5 ± 1.20 | 22.66 ± 0.55 | 23.66 ± 0.42 |
| Aqueous extract | 800 | 15.33 ± 1.02 | 9.83 ± 0.30 | 7.50 ± 0.42 |
| Aqueous extract | 1600 | 16.16 ± 0.65 | 10.66 ± 0.33 | 9.50 ± 0.61 |
| Glibenclamide | 0.5 | 16.16 ± 0.94 | 10.16 ± 0.30 | 6.83 ± 0.42 |
One way ANOVA F 254.1, 278.6; df 3, 20 3, 20; P < 0.001 < 0.001. Values expressed as Mean ± S.E.M, n = 6 in each group;
Significant as compared to control, df = 3, 20
Water intake in diabetic treated rats
| Groups (n) | Dose (mg/kg) | Water intake (ml/rat/week) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | Week 1 | Week 2 | ||
| Control | - | 54.50 ± 4.27 | 60.83 ± 2.81 | 65.16 ± 2.83 |
| Aqueous extract | 800 | 63.00 ± 1.98 | 51.00 ± 1.80 | 42.66 ± 1.92 |
| Aqueous extract | 1600 | 61.83 ± 1.83 | 57.16 ± 1.64 | 41.83 ± 2.24 |
| Glibenclamide | 0.5 | 66.66 ± 2.77 | 50.33 ± 2.53 | 34.33 ± 1.64 |
One way ANOVA F 4.4, 36.4; df 3, 20, 3, 20; P < 0.015 < 0.001 n = 6, values expressed as Mean ± S.E.M;
Significant as compared to control, df = 3, 20