Literature DB >> 20431434

A biomechanical study of the Charleston brace for the treatment of scoliosis.

Julien Clin1, Carl-Eric Aubin, Stefan Parent, Hubert Labelle.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A biomechanical study of the Charleston brace.
OBJECTIVE: To model the nighttime Charleston brace treatment and study its biomechanical action. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The Charleston brace has been proposed as an alternative to the traditional daytime thoracolumbosacral orthosis for the treatment of moderate scoliotic deformities. It is worn at night and imposes a supine side-bending to reduce the major scoliotic curve. The biomechanics of the Charleston brace is still poorly understood.
METHODS: The geometry of the spine, pelvis, rib cage, and of the external trunk surface of 2 scoliotic patients were acquired using a 3-dimensional multiview radiograph reconstruction technique and surface topography. A finite element model of each patient's trunk was created. Two sets of mechanical properties (stiff and normal) of the spine were tested. For each case, the transition from standing to supine position was first simulated by modifying the direction of the gravity forces acting on the patients' spine. Supine bending was simulated by applying a lateral displacement on the first thoracic vertebra. A custom-fit Charleston brace was modeled and positioned on the patient model. Tension was applied in the straps. Efficiency of the simulated Charleston braces was studied by computing geometrical corrections and effects on the internal stresses of the spine.
RESULTS: The reduction of the major scoliotic curve varied between 58% and 97% and was in the range of published clinical data. Internal compressive stresses up to 1 MPa were generated on the convex side of the major scoliotic curve and tensile stresses up to 1 MPa on its concavity. In contrast, increased compressive stresses were exerted on the concavity of the secondary curves and added tensile stresses in their convexity.
CONCLUSION: This study quantified the Charleston brace's biomechanical effect, which consists in inverting the asymmetrical compressive loading in the major scoliotic curve. It also highlighted that the Charleston brace worsens the asymmetrical compressive loading in the compensatory curves. The finite element model developed could help studying different brace designs and optimizing brace efficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20431434     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c5b5fa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  11 in total

1.  Effectiveness of braces designed using computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and finite element simulation compared to CAD/CAM only for the conservative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  N Cobetto; C E Aubin; S Parent; J Clin; S Barchi; I Turgeon; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Prediction of brace effect in scoliotic patients: blinded evaluation of a novel brace simulator-an observational cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Aurélien Courvoisier; Matthieu Nesme; Julien Gerbelot; Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry; François Faure
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-03-16       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Finite element analysis in brace treatment on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Wenqing Wei; Tianyuan Zhang; Zifang Huang; Junlin Yang
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Review of current technologies and methods supplementing brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Andrew Chan; Edmond Lou; Doug Hill
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 1.548

5.  Development of a detailed volumetric finite element model of the spine to simulate surgical correction of spinal deformities.

Authors:  Mark Driscoll; Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong; Hubert Labelle; Stefan Parent
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Nighttime bracing versus observation for early adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  John M Wiemann; Suken A Shah; Charles T Price
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.324

7.  Micro CT Analysis of Spine Architecture in a Mouse Model of Scoliosis.

Authors:  Chan Gao; Brian P Chen; Michael B Sullivan; Jasmine Hui; Jean A Ouellet; Janet E Henderson; Neil Saran
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 5.555

8.  3D correction of AIS in braces designed using CAD/CAM and FEM: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nikita Cobetto; Carl-Éric Aubin; Stefan Parent; Soraya Barchi; Isabelle Turgeon; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2017-07-23

9.  A mechanical analog thoracolumbar spine model for the evaluation of scoliosis bracing technology.

Authors:  Chloe L Chung; Derek M Kelly; Jack R Steele; Denis J DiAngelo
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2018-12-04

10.  Global postural re-education in pediatric idiopathic scoliosis: a biomechanical modeling and analysis of curve reduction during active and assisted self-correction.

Authors:  Sarah Dupuis; Carole Fortin; Christiane Caouette; Isabelle Leclair; Carl-Éric Aubin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.