Literature DB >> 20430116

Validity of a point of care device (Cholestech LDX) to monitor liver enzyme activity (aminotransferase measures) during a clinical trial.

Jody L Green1, Liza M Reifler, Kennon J Heard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Serum transaminase activity is a common measure of liver injury used in clinical trials. The use of a point of care device to monitor serum transaminases would allow immediate evaluation of this safety endpoint and may be less expensive than standard laboratory testing.
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare a point of care transaminase test to a standard laboratory measurement.
METHODS: Subjects were healthy adults participating in a clinical trial measuring the effects of therapeutic doses of acetaminophen on serum transaminase activity. For this study, serum transaminase activity was determined every 3days for 14days. At each measurement, a sample was sent to the clinical laboratory for measurement and also analyzed using a point of care device (Cholestech LDX, Hayward CA). The results were compared using a Bland-Altman plot to identify bias and we also measured the agreement between the techniques for categorizing samples as "low", "normal" or "elevated".
RESULTS: One hundred thirty three samples from 35 subjects were compared. The 95% confidence interval for the limits of agreement between the LDX and the clinical laboratory was -8.46 to 27.09IU/L. Agreement for classification as low, normal or elevated was moderate between the two methods (Kappa=0.37).
CONCLUSION: The point of care device provided moderate agreement with the laboratory transaminase measurement. However, use of the device would have resulted in misclassification of approximately 1/3 of samples. We do not recommend this point of care device for the measurement of serum transaminases in clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20430116      PMCID: PMC2891138          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  5 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual.

Authors:  J Martin Bland; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.051

3.  Effects of clinical laboratory choice on study outcome: an interlaboratory evaluation of aminotransferase levels.

Authors:  Jody L Green; Elizabeth Campagna; Gregory M Bogdan; Richard C Dart; Kennon Heard
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.705

4.  Usefulness of point-of-care testing in the treatment of diabetes in an underserved population.

Authors:  Sandra Leal; Marisa Soto-Rowen
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

5.  Point of care troponin decreases time in the emergency department for patients with possible acute coronary syndrome: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Conrad Loten; John Attia; Carolyn Hullick; John Marley; Patrick McElduff
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.740

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Ambient Ionization Mass Spectrometry Measurement of Aminotransferase Activity.

Authors:  Xin Yan; Xin Li; Chengsen Zhang; Yang Xu; R Graham Cooks
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Performance of an Optimized Paper-Based Test for Rapid Visual Measurement of Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) in Fingerstick and Venipuncture Samples.

Authors:  Sidhartha Jain; Radha Rajasingham; Farzad Noubary; Erin Coonahan; Ryan Schoeplein; Rachel Baden; Michael Curry; Nezam Afdhal; Shailendra Kumar; Nira R Pollock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.