Literature DB >> 20429883

Identifying obstacles to participation in a questionnaire survey on widowers' grief.

Bragi Skulason1, Asgeir R Helgason.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine if Icelandic widowers might foresee obstacles to responding to a questionnaire on bereavement. Also, we sought to compare the proportion of men reporting obstacles in a telephone interview to the actual response rate in the questionnaire survey.
METHODS: The study was part of a nation-wide survey of widowers who lost their wives in 1999, 2000, and 2001. This included all widowers born in Iceland 1924-1969 (aged 30-75 years) who were alive, and residing in Iceland at the time of the study. A telephone poll was conducted prior to sending out a questionnaire to determine if the widowers would be interested in responding, or if they could see obstacles, which could affect their willingness to respond to a subsequent questionnaire survey. The telephone poll was repeated five years later with a random sample of the original study base to determine if views initially expressed towards the questionnaire survey, had changed over time.
RESULTS: Of the 357 eligible widowers, 11 had died prior to the first telephone interview, yielding a study population of 346 widowers. Of those, 296 (86%) were reachable and all of these (100%) were willing to participate in the telephone survey. Of them, 55% identified obstacles to participation in the questionnaire survey. Men under 60 years were less likely to identify obstacles. Years from loss (second through fourth years) were not associated with reporting obstacles to participation. The response rate in the epidemiological questionnaire survey following the telephone interview was 62% (216/346).Of those who did identify obstacles 23%, did not did not identify any particular obstacle, but 33% stated that "they felt bad" or that it would be "a painful experience" or that they felt "uncomfortable" talking about their grief. About 18% stated their grief was "a private matter"; 6% stated that they did not want to be "stuck with their grief"; 9% said that it was "too late" to talk about their grief or that they "wanted to look towards their future". Additionally, 11% stated "other reasons", including responses like: "it's too early to talk about it", and "I have started another relationship - don't want complications."
CONCLUSIONS: The willingness to participate in the telephone interview was high and indicates a strong interest in the subject. Also, exposure to the study appeared to increase willingness to participate, since many men who initially could see obstacles to participation, actually participated in the epidemiological questionnaire survey. However, approximately one third of the men who initially identified obstacles to participation remained negative toward participation throughout the study period.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20429883      PMCID: PMC2873496          DOI: 10.1186/1472-684X-9-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Palliat Care        ISSN: 1472-684X            Impact factor:   3.234


  18 in total

1.  Guidelines for conducting ethical bereavement research.

Authors:  Colin Murray Parkes
Journal:  Death Stud       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr

2.  A population-based nationwide study of parents' perceptions of a questionnaire on their child's death due to cancer.

Authors:  Ulrika Kreicbergs; Unnur Valdimarsdóttir; Gunnar Steineck; Jan-Inge Henter
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Aug 28-Sep 3       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Health care-related predictors of husbands' preparedness for the death of a wife to cancer--a population-based follow-up.

Authors:  A Hauksdóttir; U Valdimarsdóttir; C J Fürst; E Onelöv; G Steineck
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Predictors of postbereavement depressive symptomatology among family caregivers of cancer patients.

Authors:  M E Kurtz; J C Kurtz; C W Given; B Given
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Family members' perceptions of palliative cancer care: predictors of family functioning and family members' health.

Authors:  L J Kristjanson; J A Sloan; D Dudgeon; E Adaskin
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.250

6.  Long-term effects of widowhood after terminal cancer: a Swedish nationwide follow-up.

Authors:  Unnur Valdimarsdóttir; Asgeir R Helgason; Carl-Johan Fürst; Jan Adolfsson; Gunnar Steineck
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  Confronting a traumatic event: toward an understanding of inhibition and disease.

Authors:  J W Pennebaker; S K Beall
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1986-08

8.  Health after bereavement. A controlled study of young Boston widows and widowers.

Authors:  C M Parkes; R J Brown
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1972 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.312

9.  Bereaved parents' experience of research participation.

Authors:  Kari Dyregrov
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  The unrecognised cost of cancer patients' unrelieved symptoms:a nationwide follow-up of their surviving partners.

Authors:  U Valdimarsdóttir; A R Helgason; C-J Fürst; J Adolfsson; G Steineck
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-05-20       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Assessing survival in widowers, and controls - a nationwide, six- to nine-year follow-up.

Authors:  Bragi Skulason; Lilja Sigrun Jonsdottir; Valgerdur Sigurdardottir; Asgeir R Helgason
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Death talk: gender differences in talking about one's own impending death.

Authors:  Bragi Skulason; Arna Hauksdottir; Kozma Ahcic; Asgeir R Helgason
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.234

3.  Factors Associated with Participation, Active Refusals and Reasons for Not Taking Part in a Mortality Followback Survey Evaluating End-of-Life Care.

Authors:  Natalia Calanzani; Irene J Higginson; Jonathan Koffman; Barbara Gomes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.