S M Mosca1, G R Schinella, H A Tournier, H E Cingolani. 1. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Centro de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata; and.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To establish whether the total antioxidant capacity of nonalcoholic extracts of three Argentine red wines (RWE) is correlated with their protection against ischemia-reperfusion injury. ANIMALS AND METHODS: The antioxidant properties of three RWE were determined using different free radical-generating systems. To examine the effects of these RWE during a 20 min global ischemic period followed by 30 min of reperfusion, isolated rat hearts received 50 mug/mL of RWE 1 (cabernet-sauvignon), RWE 2 (malbec) or RWE 3 (a commercial mixture of cabernet-sauvignon, malbec and merlot) 10 min before and after ischemia. Left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP), maximal velocity of rise of left ventricular pressure (+dP/dt(max)) and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) were used to assess contractility and diastolic function. RESULTS: All RWE inhibited lipid peroxidation induced by the Cl(4)C/NADPH system in a similar proportion (42+/-4%, 47+/-9% and 43+/-14% for RWE 1, RWE 2 and RWE 3, respectively). The scavenging activity of superoxide anion and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl radical was about the same with the three RWE. In hearts without RWE treatment, LVDP and +dP/dt(max) were 61+/-4% and 62+/-5%, respectively, at the end of the reperfusion period. Infusion of RWE 1 and RWE 2 significantly improved postischemic recovery (LVDP and +dP/dt(max) were 102+/-4% and 101+/-4% for RWE 1 and 92+/-5% and 91+/-5% for RWE 2, respectively) and attenuated the increase of LVEDP. RWE 3 did not improve either systolic or diastolic dysfunction. CONCLUSION: These data show that although the three non-alcoholic RWE exhibit a similar total antioxidant capacity, only two of them protect the heart against myocardial stunning, suggesting that the protective effect is not primarily linked to the anti-oxidant properties of the extracts.
OBJECTIVE: To establish whether the total antioxidant capacity of nonalcoholic extracts of three Argentine red wines (RWE) is correlated with their protection against ischemia-reperfusion injury. ANIMALS AND METHODS: The antioxidant properties of three RWE were determined using different free radical-generating systems. To examine the effects of these RWE during a 20 min global ischemic period followed by 30 min of reperfusion, isolated rat hearts received 50 mug/mL of RWE 1 (cabernet-sauvignon), RWE 2 (malbec) or RWE 3 (a commercial mixture of cabernet-sauvignon, malbec and merlot) 10 min before and after ischemia. Left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP), maximal velocity of rise of left ventricular pressure (+dP/dt(max)) and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) were used to assess contractility and diastolic function. RESULTS: All RWE inhibited lipid peroxidation induced by the Cl(4)C/NADPH system in a similar proportion (42+/-4%, 47+/-9% and 43+/-14% for RWE 1, RWE 2 and RWE 3, respectively). The scavenging activity of superoxide anion and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl radical was about the same with the three RWE. In hearts without RWE treatment, LVDP and +dP/dt(max) were 61+/-4% and 62+/-5%, respectively, at the end of the reperfusion period. Infusion of RWE 1 and RWE 2 significantly improved postischemic recovery (LVDP and +dP/dt(max) were 102+/-4% and 101+/-4% for RWE 1 and 92+/-5% and 91+/-5% for RWE 2, respectively) and attenuated the increase of LVEDP. RWE 3 did not improve either systolic or diastolic dysfunction. CONCLUSION: These data show that although the three non-alcoholic RWE exhibit a similar total antioxidant capacity, only two of them protect the heart against myocardial stunning, suggesting that the protective effect is not primarily linked to the anti-oxidant properties of the extracts.
Entities:
Keywords:
Antioxidant capacity; Ischemia; Red wine; Reperfusion
Authors: E Andriambeloson; C Magnier; G Haan-Archipoff; A Lobstein; R Anton; A Beretz; J C Stoclet; R Andriantsitohaina Journal: J Nutr Date: 1998-12 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: K Iijima; M Yoshizumi; M Hashimoto; S Kim; M Eto; J Ako; Y Q Liang; N Sudoh; K Hosoda; K Nakahara; K Toba; Y Ouchi Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-02-22 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: M J Sanz; M L Ferrandiz; M Cejudo; M C Terencio; B Gil; G Bustos; A Ubeda; R Gunasegaran; M J Alcaraz Journal: Xenobiotica Date: 1994-07 Impact factor: 1.908
Authors: Yasmin E Lopera; Juliana Fantinelli; Luisa F González Arbeláez; Benjamín Rojano; José Luis Ríos; Guillermo Schinella; Susana Mosca Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2013-02-06 Impact factor: 2.629