Literature DB >> 20426116

Subject-matched templates for spatial normalization.

Torsten Rohlfing1, Edith V Sullivan, Adolf Pfefferbaum.   

Abstract

Spatial normalization of images from multiple subjects is a common problem in group comparison studies, such as voxel-based and deformation-based morphometric analyses. Use of a study-specific template for normalization may improve normalization accuracy over a study-independent standard template (Good et al., NeuroImage, 14(1):21-36, 2001). Here, we develop this approach further by introducing the concept of subject-matched templates. Rather than using a single template for the entire population, a different template is used for every subject, with the template matched to the subject in terms of age, sex, and potentially other parameters (e.g., disease). All subject-matched templates are created from a single generative regression model of atlas appearance, thus providing a priori template-to-template correspondence without registration. We demonstrate that such an approach is technically feasible and significantly improves spatial normalization accuracy over using a single template.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20426116      PMCID: PMC2805834          DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04271-3_28

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv


  10 in total

1.  Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm.

Authors:  Y Zhang; M Brady; S Smith
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 2.  Voxel-based morphometry--the methods.

Authors:  J Ashburner; K J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images.

Authors:  D Rueckert; L I Sonoda; C Hayes; D L Hill; M O Leach; D J Hawkes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Retrospective correction of MR intensity inhomogeneity by information minimization.

Authors:  B Likar; M A Viergever; F Pernus
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Regional spatial normalization: toward an optimal target.

Authors:  P Kochunov; J L Lancaster; P Thompson; R Woods; J Mazziotta; J Hardies; P Fox
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Automatic construction of 3-D statistical deformation models of the brain using nonrigid registration.

Authors:  Daniel Rueckert; Alejandro F Frangi; Julia A Schnabel
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Identifying global anatomical differences: deformation-based morphometry.

Authors:  J Ashburner; C Hutton; R Frackowiak; I Johnsrude; C Price; K Friston
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  A voxel-based morphometric study of ageing in 465 normal adult human brains.

Authors:  C D Good; I S Johnsrude; J Ashburner; R N Henson; K J Friston; R S Frackowiak
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Enhanced brain extraction improves the accuracy of brain atrophy estimation.

Authors:  Marco Battaglini; Stephen M Smith; Susanna Brogi; Nicola De Stefano
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration.

Authors:  Arno Klein; Jesper Andersson; Babak A Ardekani; John Ashburner; Brian Avants; Ming-Chang Chiang; Gary E Christensen; D Louis Collins; James Gee; Pierre Hellier; Joo Hyun Song; Mark Jenkinson; Claude Lepage; Daniel Rueckert; Paul Thompson; Tom Vercauteren; Roger P Woods; J John Mann; Ramin V Parsey
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 6.556

  10 in total
  6 in total

1.  Fast and robust extraction of hippocampus from MR images for diagnostics of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Jyrki Lötjönen; Robin Wolz; Juha Koikkalainen; Valtteri Julkunen; Lennart Thurfjell; Roger Lundqvist; Gunhild Waldemar; Hilkka Soininen; Daniel Rueckert
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Minimizing noise in pediatric task-based functional MRI; Adolescents with developmental disabilities and typical development.

Authors:  Catherine Fassbender; Prerona Mukherjee; Julie B Schweitzer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Voxel-based population analysis for correlating local dose and rectal toxicity in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Oscar Acosta; Gael Drean; Juan D Ospina; Antoine Simon; Pascal Haigron; Caroline Lafond; Renaud de Crevoisier
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  (Un)common space in infant neuroimaging studies: A systematic review of infant templates.

Authors:  Alexander J Dufford; C Alice Hahn; Hannah Peterson; Silvia Gini; Saloni Mehta; Alexis Alfano; Dustin Scheinost
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 5.399

5.  Age-specific MRI brain and head templates for healthy adults from 20 through 89 years of age.

Authors:  Paul T Fillmore; Michelle C Phillips-Meek; John E Richards
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 5.750

6.  Automated Spatial Brain Normalization and Hindbrain White Matter Reference Tissue Give Improved [(18)F]-Florbetaben PET Quantitation in Alzheimer's Model Mice.

Authors:  Felix Overhoff; Matthias Brendel; Anna Jaworska; Viktoria Korzhova; Andreas Delker; Federico Probst; Carola Focke; Franz-Josef Gildehaus; Janette Carlsen; Karlheinz Baumann; Christian Haass; Peter Bartenstein; Jochen Herms; Axel Rominger
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 4.677

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.