Literature DB >> 18255315

Enhanced brain extraction improves the accuracy of brain atrophy estimation.

Marco Battaglini1, Stephen M Smith2, Susanna Brogi1, Nicola De Stefano3.   

Abstract

BET (Brain Extraction Tool) is a widely used computer program to automatically separate brain from non-brain structures in MR images. This procedure is used in SIENAX and SIENA, which are robust approaches to quantifying brain volume (atrophy state) and volume change (atrophy rate), respectively. Occasionally, however, BET produces imperfect results (e.g., inclusion of non-brain structures). This is usually either ignored (if inaccuracies are small) or corrected by manual adjustment, with the disadvantages of user intervention. We describe here a new, automated option in BET. This is based on the original BET, but uses standard-space masking to remove tissue around the eyes, and further morphological operations and thresholding to refine eyeball removal and eliminate additional non-brain tissues. To assess whether the new BET procedure improves brain volume measurements, this was compared with the traditional and manual editing procedures in SIENA and SIENAX. Measures of atrophy rate and state were significantly higher with the traditional procedure than with the manual editing and new procedures. In contrast, both atrophy measures were almost identical and highly correlated when the manual editing and new procedures were used. The voxels excluded with these two procedures showed close overlap, as judged by the Dice overlap coefficient. We conclude that, in SIENA and SIENAX, the proposed BET procedure shows results matching those obtained after manual editing, thus more closely approximating the "true" brain volume. Multicentre studies monitoring brain atrophy in clinical trials may receive benefit by using this unbiased, fully automated procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18255315     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  25 in total

1.  Multi-atlas skull-stripping.

Authors:  Jimit Doshi; Guray Erus; Yangming Ou; Bilwaj Gaonkar; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Bone density and brain atrophy in early Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Natalia Loskutova; Robyn A Honea; Eric D Vidoni; William M Brooks; Jeffrey M Burns
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.472

3.  An open source multivariate framework for n-tissue segmentation with evaluation on public data.

Authors:  Brian B Avants; Nicholas J Tustison; Jue Wu; Philip A Cook; James C Gee
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2011-12

4.  Evidence of diffuse damage in frontal and occipital cortex in the brain of patients with post-traumatic stress disorder.

Authors:  Maricla Tavanti; Marco Battaglini; Federico Borgogni; Letizia Bossini; Sara Calossi; Daniela Marino; Gianpaolo Vatti; Fulvio Pieraccini; Antonio Federico; Paolo Castrogiovanni; Nicola De Stefano
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  An efficient and accurate method for robust inter-dataset brain extraction and comparisons with 9 other methods.

Authors:  Philip Novosad; D Louis Collins
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Magnetization transfer MR imaging demonstrates degeneration of the subcortical and cortical gray matter in Huntington disease.

Authors:  A Ginestroni; M Battaglini; S Diciotti; R Della Nave; L N Mazzoni; C Tessa; M Giannelli; S Piacentini; N De Stefano; M Mascalchi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Combining a Patch-based Approach with a Non-rigid Registration-based Label Fusion Method for the Hippocampal Segmentation in Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Carlos Platero; M Carmen Tobar
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2017-04

8.  Discriminating Alzheimer's disease progression using a new hippocampal marker from T1-weighted MRI: The local surface roughness.

Authors:  Carlos Platero; María Eugenia López; María Del Carmen Tobar; Miguel Yus; Fernando Maestu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  A robust method to estimate the intracranial volume across MRI field strengths (1.5T and 3T).

Authors:  Shiva Keihaninejad; Rolf A Heckemann; Gianlorenzo Fagiolo; Mark R Symms; Joseph V Hajnal; Alexander Hammers
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Parallel imaging: is GRAPPA a useful acquisition tool for MR imaging intended for volumetric brain analysis?

Authors:  Terri L Lindholm; Lisa Botes; Eva-Lena Engman; Anders Frank; Tomas Jonsson; Leif Svensson; Per Julin
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 1.930

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.