Literature DB >> 20426102

Feature-based morphometry.

Matthew Toews1, William M Wells, D Louis Collins, Tal Arbel.   

Abstract

This paper presents feature-based morphometry (FBM), a new, fully data-driven technique for identifying group-related differences in volumetric imagery. In contrast to most morphometry methods which assume one-to-one correspondence between all subjects, FBM models images as a collage of distinct, localized image features which may not be present in all subjects. FBM thus explicitly accounts for the case where the same anatomical tissue cannot be reliably identified in all subjects due to disease or anatomical variability. A probabilistic model describes features in terms of their appearance, geometry, and relationship to subgroups of a population, and is automatically learned from a set of subject images and group labels. Features identified indicate group-related anatomical structure that can potentially be used as disease biomarkers or as a basis for computer-aided diagnosis. Scale-invariant image features are used, which reflect generic, salient patterns in the image. Experiments validate FBM clinically in the analysis of normal (NC) and Alzheimer's (AD) brain images using the freely available OASIS database. FBM automatically identifies known structural differences between NC and AD subjects in a fully data-driven fashion, and obtains an equal error classification rate of 0.78 on new subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20426102      PMCID: PMC3854925          DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04271-3_14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv


  18 in total

Review 1.  Voxel-based morphometry--the methods.

Authors:  J Ashburner; K J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  "Voxel-based morphometry" should not be used with imperfectly registered images.

Authors:  F L Bookstein
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Why voxel-based morphometry should be used.

Authors:  J Ashburner; K J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Probabilistic approaches for atlasing normal and disease-specific brain variability.

Authors:  A W Toga; P M Thompson; M S Mega; K L Narr; R E Blanton
Journal:  Anat Embryol (Berl)       Date:  2001-10

5.  Morphological classification of brains via high-dimensional shape transformations and machine learning methods.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Lao; Dinggang Shen; Zhong Xue; Bilge Karacali; Susan M Resnick; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Retrospective evaluation of intersubject brain registration.

Authors:  P Hellier; C Barillot; I Corouge; B Gibaud; G Le Goualher; D L Collins; A Evans; G Malandain; N Ayache; G E Christensen; H J Johnson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Why voxel-based morphometric analysis should be used with great caution when characterizing group differences.

Authors:  Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Deformation-based mapping of volume change from serial brain MRI in the presence of local tissue contrast change.

Authors:  Colin Studholme; Corina Drapaca; Bistra Iordanova; Valerie Cardenas
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  A statistical parts-based model of anatomical variability.

Authors:  Matthew Toews; Tal Arbel
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS): cross-sectional MRI data in young, middle aged, nondemented, and demented older adults.

Authors:  Daniel S Marcus; Tracy H Wang; Jamie Parker; John G Csernansky; John C Morris; Randy L Buckner
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.