Literature DB >> 20424988

What should be done with a dilated bile duct?

Adrian N Holm1, Henning Gerke.   

Abstract

Current methods for imaging the biliary tree include ultrasound, CT, MRI, endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Bile duct abnormalities may be identified during evaluation of patient symptoms or laboratory abnormalities, or incidentally during imaging for another problem. Biliary dilatation, when identified, may be separated into obstructive or nonobstructive causes. Clinical presentation should guide decisions on which, if any, additional investigations are necessary. Choledocholithiasis is the most common cause of obstructive dilatation and frequently requires decompression. Nonobstructive causes include cystic dilatation, aging, and possibly post-cholecystectomy state. Data are limited regarding the yield of further investigations in patients with incidentally identified modest ductal dilatation without symptoms or laboratory abnormalities. Additional investigations are more likely to identify clinically relevant findings in patients with more pronounced dilatation. EUS is highly accurate, low-invasive, and useful in this setting, whereas ERC should be reserved for cases likely to require therapeutic intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20424988     DOI: 10.1007/s11894-010-0094-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep        ISSN: 1522-8037


  39 in total

Review 1.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Role of EUS.

Authors:  S Ian Gan; Elizabeth Rajan; Douglas G Adler; Todd H Baron; Michelle A Anderson; Brooks D Cash; Raquel E Davila; Jason A Dominitz; M Edwyn Harrison; Steven O Ikenberry; David Lichtenstein; Waqar Qureshi; Bo Shen; Mark Zuckerman; Robert D Fanelli; Kenneth K Lee; Trina Van Guilder
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2007-07-23       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Endoscopic ultrasound: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary obstruction.

Authors:  Donald Garrow; Scott Miller; Debajyoti Sinha; Jason Conway; Brenda J Hoffman; Robert H Hawes; Joseph Romagnuolo
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 11.382

4.  MR assessment of bile duct size in healthy individuals: comparison with US measurements.

Authors:  Gordana Lovrencić Prpić; Nenad Babić; Domagoj Marjan; Marija Pećina; Miljenko Marotti
Journal:  Coll Antropol       Date:  2007-06

5.  Comparison of the extrahepatic bile duct size measured by ultrasound and by different radiographic methods.

Authors:  C Niederau; A Sonnenberg; J Mueller
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  The size of the normal common hepatic duct following cholecystectomy: an ultrasonographic study.

Authors:  M F Graham; P L Cooperberg; M M Cohen; H J Burhenne
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Is there a significant increase in bile duct width after cholecystectomy?

Authors:  L E Hammarström; T Holmin
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 8.  MRCP vs. ERCP in the evaluation of biliary pathologies: review of current literature.

Authors:  Koray Hekimoglu; Yucel Ustundag; Abdurrahim Dusak; Zuhal Erdem; Bulent Karademir; Selim Aydemir; Sadi Gundogdu
Journal:  J Dig Dis       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.325

9.  EUS: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Frances Tse; Louis Liu; Alan N Barkun; David Armstrong; Paul Moayyedi
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  MRCP compared to diagnostic ERCP for diagnosis when biliary obstruction is suspected: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eva C Kaltenthaler; Stephen J Walters; Jim Chilcott; Anthony Blakeborough; Yolanda Bravo Vergel; Steven Thomas
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 1.930

View more
  13 in total

1.  Clinical significance and long-term outcome of incidentally found bile duct dilatation.

Authors:  Jaryong Jeon; Song Yi Song; Kyu Taek Lee; Kwang Hyuck Lee; Mun Hee Bae; Jong Kyun Lee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Endoscopic ultrasound in common bile duct dilatation with normal liver enzymes.

Authors:  Claudio De Angelis; Milena Marietti; Mauro Bruno; Rinaldo Pellicano; Mario Rizzetto
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-07-10

3.  Common bile duct dilation after bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Neal Mehta; Andrew T Strong; Tyler Stevens; Kevin El-Hayek; Alfred Nelson; Adeyinka Owoyele; Ahmed Eltelbany; Prabhleen Chahal; Maged Rizk; Carol A Burke; John McMichael; Rocio Lopez; Joseph Veniero; John Vargo; Matthew Kroh; Amit Bhatt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Cholangiographic characteristics of common bile duct dilatation in children.

Authors:  Seak Hee Oh; Soo-Hee Chang; Hyun Jin Kim; Jin Min Cho; Ji-Hee Hwang; Jung-Man Namgoong; Dae Yeon Kim; Young-Ah Cho; Chong Hyun Yoon; Kyung Mo Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Yield of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the investigation of bile duct dilatation in asymptomatic patients.

Authors:  Shlomit Tamir; Marius Braun; Assaf Issachar; Gil N Bachar; Ofer Benjaminov
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 4.623

6.  Efficacy of intraductal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of non-opaque choledocholith.

Authors:  Jie Lu; Chuan-Yong Guo; Xuan-Fu Xu; Xing-Peng Wang; Rong Wan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Post Roux-en-Y gastric bypass biliary dilation: natural process or significant entity?

Authors:  K El-Hayek; P Timratana; J Meranda; H Shimizu; S Eldar; B Chand
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Which patients with dilated common bile and/or pancreatic ducts have positive findings on EUS?

Authors:  Vernon Carriere; Jason Conway; Jerry Evans; Susanne Shokoohi; Girish Mishra
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-01

9.  Combining endoscopic ultrasound and tumor markers improves the diagnostic yield on the etiology of common bile duct dilation secondary to periampullary pathologies.

Authors:  Han Ding; Pinghong Zhou; Meidong Xu; Weifeng Chen; Quanlin Li; Tao Chen; Mingyan Cai; Tianyin Chen; Jingjing Lian; Yiqun Zhang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-07

10.  Role of endoscopic ultrasound in evaluation of unexplained common bile duct dilatation on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Surinder Singh Rana; Deepak Kumar Bhasin; Vishal Sharma; Chalapathi Rao; Rajesh Gupta; Kartar Singh
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2013
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.