Literature DB >> 20423978

Differential effects of nucleotide analogs on scanning-dependent initiation and elongation of mammalian mRNA translation in vitro.

Julie L Aspden1, Richard J Jackson.   

Abstract

Codon-anticodon interactions are central to both the initiation and elongation phases of eukaryotic mRNA translation. The obvious difference is that the interaction takes place in the ribosomal A-site during elongation, whereas the 40S ribosomal subunit and associated initiation factors scan the mRNA sequence in search of an initiation codon with Met-tRNA(i) bound in the P-site, ceasing once codon-anticodon interaction is established at the AUG. As an indirect test of whether the two mechanisms of mRNA sequence inspection are basically similar or not, the effects of six different uridine analog substitutions in the mRNA were examined in reticulocyte lysate translation assays and 80S initiation complex formation assays. Four constructs, each with the same reporter coding sequence, were used, differing in whether the initiation codon was AUG or ACG, and in whether the 5'-UTR had U residues or not. Three analogs (5-bromoU, 5-aminoallylU, and pseudoU) inhibited both elongation and initiation, but the other three had striking differential effects. Ribothymidine had a negligible effect on elongation but caused a approximately 50% inhibition of initiation, with little effect on actual AUG recognition, which implies that inhibition must have occurred at some earlier step in initiation. In complete contrast, 2' deoxyU was prohibitive to elongation but had no effect on initiation, and 4-thioU actually stimulated initiation but quite strongly inhibited elongation processivity. These results show that the detailed mechanisms of inspection of the mRNA sequence during scanning-dependent initiation and elongation must be considerably different.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20423978      PMCID: PMC2874165          DOI: 10.1261/rna.1978610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  RNA        ISSN: 1355-8382            Impact factor:   4.942


  18 in total

1.  Selection of tRNA by the ribosome requires a transition from an open to a closed form.

Authors:  James M Ogle; Frank V Murphy; Michael J Tarry; V Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-11-27       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Fast calculation of van der Waals volume as a sum of atomic and bond contributions and its application to drug compounds.

Authors:  Yuan H Zhao; Michael H Abraham; Andreas M Zissimos
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 4.354

3.  Lipoxygenase mRNA silencing in erythroid differentiation: The 3'UTR regulatory complex controls 60S ribosomal subunit joining.

Authors:  D H Ostareck; A Ostareck-Lederer; I N Shatsky; M W Hentze
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-01-26       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Ribosomal decoding processes at codons in the A or P sites depend differently on 2'-OH groups.

Authors:  A P Potapov; F J Triana-Alonso; K H Nierhaus
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-07-28       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Migration of 40 S ribosomal subunits on messenger RNA in the presence of edeine.

Authors:  M Kozak; A J Shatkin
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1978-09-25       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  A conformational change in the eukaryotic translation preinitiation complex and release of eIF1 signal recognition of the start codon.

Authors:  David Maag; Christie A Fekete; Zygmunt Gryczynski; Jon R Lorsch
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  Structures of the ribosome in intermediate states of ratcheting.

Authors:  Wen Zhang; Jack A Dunkle; Jamie H D Cate
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Point mutations define a sequence flanking the AUG initiator codon that modulates translation by eukaryotic ribosomes.

Authors:  M Kozak
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1986-01-31       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  The eukaryotic translation initiation factors eIF1 and eIF1A induce an open conformation of the 40S ribosome.

Authors:  Lori A Passmore; T Martin Schmeing; David Maag; Drew J Applefield; Michael G Acker; Mikkel A Algire; Jon R Lorsch; V Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  The immediate downstream codon strongly influences the efficiency of utilization of eukaryotic translation initiation codons.

Authors:  S Grünert; R J Jackson
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1994-08-01       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The epitranscriptome beyond m6A.

Authors:  David Wiener; Schraga Schwartz
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 2.  Pseudouridine: still mysterious, but never a fake (uridine)!

Authors:  Felix Spenkuch; Yuri Motorin; Mark Helm
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.652

Review 3.  Epitranscriptomic marks: Emerging modulators of RNA virus gene expression.

Authors:  Rachel Netzband; Cara T Pager
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 9.957

Review 4.  Tricks and threats of RNA viruses - towards understanding the fate of viral RNA.

Authors:  Lukasz Markiewicz; Karolina Drazkowska; Pawel J Sikorski
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 4.652

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.