Literature DB >> 20421324

Genetic architecture and the evolution of sex.

Rolf Lohaus1, Christina L Burch, Ricardo B R Azevedo.   

Abstract

Theoretical investigations of the advantages of sex have tended to treat the genetic architecture of organisms as static and have not considered that genetic architecture might coevolve with reproductive mode. As a result, some potential advantages of sex may have been missed. Using a gene network model, we recently showed that recombination imposes selection for robustness to mutation and that negative epistasis can evolve as a by-product of this selection. These results motivated a detailed exploration of the mutational deterministic hypothesis, a hypothesis in which the advantage of sex depends critically on epistasis. We found that sexual populations do evolve higher mean fitness and lower genetic load than asexual populations at equilibrium, and, under moderate stabilizing selection and large population size, these equilibrium sexual populations resist invasion by asexuals. However, we found no evidence that these long- and short-term advantages to sex were explained by the negative epistasis that evolved in our experiments. The long-term advantage of sex was that sexual populations evolved a lower deleterious mutation rate, but this property was not sufficient to account for the ability of sexual populations to resist invasion by asexuals. The ability to resist asexual invasion was acquired simultaneously with an increase in recombinational robustness that minimized the cost of sex. These observations provide the first direct evidence that sexual reproduction does indeed select for conditions that favor its own maintenance. Furthermore, our results highlight the importance of considering a dynamic view of the genetic architecture to understand the evolution of sex and recombination.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20421324     DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esq013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hered        ISSN: 0022-1503            Impact factor:   2.645


  9 in total

1.  Dynamic epistasis for different alleles of the same gene.

Authors:  Lin Xu; Brandon Barker; Zhenglong Gu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Robustness and evolvability.

Authors:  Joanna Masel; Meredith V Trotter
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  An Evolving Genetic Architecture Interacts with Hill-Robertson Interference to Determine the Benefit of Sex.

Authors:  Alexander O B Whitlock; Kayla M Peck; Ricardo B R Azevedo; Christina L Burch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  What do isogamous organisms teach us about sex and the two sexes?

Authors:  Jussi Lehtonen; Hanna Kokko; Geoff A Parker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Recombination drives the evolution of mutational robustness.

Authors:  Sonia Singhal; Shawn M Gomez; Christina L Burch
Journal:  Curr Opin Syst Biol       Date:  2019-01-02

6.  Model transcriptional networks with continuously varying expression levels.

Authors:  Mauricio O Carneiro; Clifford H Taubes; Daniel L Hartl
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Why and how genetic canalization evolves in gene regulatory networks.

Authors:  Estelle Rünneburger; Arnaud Le Rouzic
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  The evolutionary advantage of fitness-dependent recombination in diploids: A deterministic mutation-selection balance model.

Authors:  Sviatoslav Rybnikov; Zeev Frenkel; Abraham B Korol
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Multiple mating but not recombination causes quantitative increase in offspring genetic diversity for varying genetic architectures.

Authors:  Olav Rueppell; Stephen Meier; Roland Deutsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.