Literature DB >> 20421159

RapidArc planning and delivery in patients with locally advanced head-and-neck cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy.

Patricia Doornaert1, Wilko F A R Verbakel, Michael Bieker, Ben J Slotman, Suresh Senan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Volumetric modulated arc therapy (RapidArc, Varian Medical Systems) permits the delivery of highly conformal dose distributions. We studied planning and delivery in patients who underwent RapidArc for locally advanced head-and-neck cancer (HNC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 35 consecutive patients who completed RapidArc with concurrent chemotherapy for Stages III-IV tumors of the oro- and hypopharynx/larynx in our center were identified. All underwent bilateral neck irradiation and 21 patients had at least N2 disease. A simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) delivered 70 Gy (in 2 Gy/fraction) to the planning target volume (PTV)(boost) and elective nodal regions (PTV(elect)) received 57.75 Gy. A standard planning constraint set was used and constraints for parotid glands were individually adapted. Treatments were delivered using two arcs after all plans were verified in a solid water phantom using GafChromic External Beam Therapy films.
RESULTS: RapidArc planning generally took 1.5-2 h, which was faster than with our previous seven-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy sliding window technique. Film dosimetry revealed that 0.6% of films exceeded a combination of dose differences ≥3% or distance to agreement ≥2 mm. More than 99% of both PTVs received ≥95% of the prescription dose. Average plan conformity index was 1.13 and mean dose to ipsilateral and contralateral parotid glands were 31.4 Gy and 26.1 Gy, respectively. The mean beam-on time was <3 min and mean number of monitor units was 426.
CONCLUSIONS: RapidArc achieved excellent target coverage and normal tissue sparing, with delivery completed in less than 3 min. RA is currently our standard intensity-modulated radiotherapy approach for advanced HNC. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20421159     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  30 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of SmartArc-based dual arc volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Tsair-Fwu Lee; Pei-Ju Chao; Hui-Min Ting; Su-Hua Lo; Yu-Wen Wang; Chiu-Ching Tuan; Fu-Min Fang; Te-Jen Su
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  Evaluation of the trade-offs encountered in planning and treating locally advanced head and neck cancer: intensity-modulated radiation therapy vs dual-arc volumetric-modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  M Oliver; D McConnell; M Romani; A McAllister; A Pearce; A Andronowski; X Wang; K Leszczynski
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Dose-volume-related dysphagia after constrictor muscles definition in head and neck cancer intensity-modulated radiation treatment.

Authors:  R Mazzola; F Ricchetti; A Fiorentino; S Fersino; N Giaj Levra; S Naccarato; G Sicignano; S Albanese; G Di Paola; D Alterio; R Ruggieri; F Alongi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Roll and pitch set-up errors during volumetric modulated arc delivery: can adapting gantry and collimator angles compensate?

Authors:  Nienke A Hoffmans-Holtzer; Daan Hoffmans; Max Dahele; Ben J Slotman; Wilko F A R Verbakel
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Prospective phase II trial of cetuximab plus VMAT-SIB in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Feasibility and tolerability in elderly and chemotherapy-ineligible patients.

Authors:  F Alongi; M Bignardi; I Garassino; S Pentimalli; R Cavina; P Mancosu; G Reggiori; A Poletti; D Ferrari; P Foa; A Bigoni; A Dragonetti; P Salvatori; O Spahiu; A Fogliata; L Cozzi; A Santoro; M Scorsetti
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Comparison of two different IMRT planning techniques in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Effect on parotid gland radiation doses.

Authors:  E K Uzel; S Karaçam; O Eliçin; O Uzel
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-06-09       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Early clinical experience with volumetric modulated arc therapy in head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Marta Scorsetti; Antonella Fogliata; Simona Castiglioni; Caterina Bressi; Mario Bignardi; Piera Navarria; Pietro Mancosu; Luca Cozzi; Sara Pentimalli; Filippo Alongi; Armando Santoro
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Evaluation of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with Oncentra MasterPlan® for the treatment of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Judith Alvarez-Moret; Fabian Pohl; Oliver Koelbl; Barbara Dobler
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Clinical and dosimetric evaluation of RapidArc versus standard sliding window IMRT in the treatment of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Stéphanie Smet; Maarten Lambrecht; Bianca Vanstraelen; Sandra Nuyts
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.621

10.  Clinical outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with volumetric modulated arc therapy in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Nobuki Imano; Yuji Murakami; Takeo Nakashima; Yuki Takeuchi; Ippei Takahashi; Yoshiko Doi; Ikuno Nishibuchi; Tomoki Kimura; Koichi Wadasaki; Tsutomu Ueda; Katsuhiro Hirakawa; Yasushi Nagata
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 2.374

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.