Literature DB >> 20420973

Identifying the inertial cavitation threshold and skull effects in a vessel phantom using focused ultrasound and microbubbles.

Yao-Sheng Tung1, James J Choi, Babak Baseri, Elisa E Konofagou.   

Abstract

Focused ultrasound (FUS) in combination with microbubbles has been shown capable of delivering large molecules to the brain parenchyma through opening of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). However, the mechanism behind the opening remains unknown. To investigate the pressure threshold for inertial cavitation of preformed microbubbles during sonication, passive cavitation detection in conjunction with B-mode imaging was used. A cerebral vessel was simulated by generating a cylindrical hole of 610 microm in diameter inside a polyacrylamide gel and saturating its volume with microbubbles. Definity microbubbles (Mean diameter range: 1.1-3.3 microm, Lantheus Medical Imaging, N. Billerica, MA, USA) were injected prior to sonication (frequency: 1.525 MHz; pulse length: 100 cycles; PRF: 10 Hz; sonication duration: 2 s) through an excised mouse skull. The acoustic emissions due to the cavitation response were passively detected using a cylindrically focused hydrophone, confocal with the FUS transducer and a linear-array transducer with the field of view perpendicular to the FUS beam. The broadband spectral response acquired at the passive cavitation detector (PCD) and the B-mode images identified the occurrence and location of the inertial cavitation, respectively. Findings indicated that the peak-rarefactional pressure threshold was approximately equal to 0.45 MPa, with or without the skull present. Mouse skulls did not affect the threshold of inertial cavitation but resulted in a lower inertial cavitation dose. The broadband response could be captured through the murine skull, so the same PCD set-up can be used in future in vivo applications. Copyright 2010 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20420973      PMCID: PMC3968802          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  28 in total

1.  Mechanisms of contrast agent destruction.

Authors:  J E Chomas; P Dayton; J Allen; K Morgan; K W Ferrara
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  The pulse length-dependence of inertial cavitation dose and hemolysis.

Authors:  Wen-Shiang Chen; Andrew A Brayman; Thomas J Matula; Lawrence A Crum; Morton W Miller
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  A comparison of the fragmentation thresholds and inertial cavitation doses of different ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Wen-Shiang Chen; Thomas J Matula; Andrew A Brayman; Lawrence A Crum
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Gauging the likelihood of cavitation from short-pulse, low-duty cycle diagnostic ultrasound.

Authors:  R E Apfel; C K Holland
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Micromanipulation of endothelial cells: ultrasound-microbubble-cell interaction.

Authors:  Annemieke van Wamel; Ayache Bouakaz; Michel Versluis; Nico de Jong
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Microbubble-size dependence of focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening in mice in vivo.

Authors:  James J Choi; Jameel A Feshitan; Babak Baseri; Shougang Wang; Yao-Sheng Tung; Mark A Borden; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 7.  A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective.

Authors:  M W Miller; D L Miller; A A Brayman
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Noninvasive MR imaging-guided focal opening of the blood-brain barrier in rabbits.

Authors:  K Hynynen; N McDannold; N Vykhodtseva; F A Jolesz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Ultrasound-mediated cavitation thresholds of liquid perfluorocarbon droplets in vitro.

Authors:  Tonia Giesecke; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Inertial cavitation dose and hemolysis produced in vitro with or without Optison.

Authors:  Wen-Shiang Chen; Andrew A Brayman; Thomas J Matula; Lawrence A Crum
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.998

View more
  26 in total

1.  In vivo transcranial cavitation threshold detection during ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening in mice.

Authors:  Yao-Sheng Tung; Fotios Vlachos; James J Choi; Thomas Deffieux; Kirsten Selert; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Transcranial cavitation detection in primates during blood-brain barrier opening--a performance assessment study.

Authors:  Shih-Ying Wu; Yao-Sheng Tung; Fabrice Marquet; Matthew Downs; Carlos Sanchez; Cherry Chen; Vincent Ferrera; Elisa Konofagou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 3.  Blood-brain barrier opening with focused ultrasound in experimental models of Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Maria Eleni Karakatsani; Javier Blesa; Elisa Evgenia Konofagou
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 10.338

4.  Noninvasive and localized neuronal delivery using short ultrasonic pulses and microbubbles.

Authors:  James J Choi; Kirsten Selert; Fotios Vlachos; Anna Wong; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Feasibility of noninvasive cavitation-guided blood-brain barrier opening using focused ultrasound and microbubbles in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Yao-Sheng Tung; Fabrice Marquet; Tobias Teichert; Vincent Ferrera; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 6.  Ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening.

Authors:  Elisa E Konofagou; Yao-Sheng Tung; James Choi; Thomas Deffieux; Babak Baseri; Fotios Vlachos
Journal:  Curr Pharm Biotechnol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.837

7.  FEASIBILITY STUDY OF A CLINICAL BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER OPENING ULTRASOUND SYSTEM.

Authors:  Fabrice Marquet; Yao-Sheng Tung; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Nano Life       Date:  2010-09

8.  Closed-loop control of targeted ultrasound drug delivery across the blood-brain/tumor barriers in a rat glioma model.

Authors:  Tao Sun; Yongzhi Zhang; Chanikarn Power; Phillip M Alexander; Jonathan T Sutton; Muna Aryal; Natalia Vykhodtseva; Eric L Miller; Nathan J McDannold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Relationship between cavitation and loss of echogenicity from ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Kirthi Radhakrishnan; Kenneth B Bader; Kevin J Haworth; Jonathan A Kopechek; Jason L Raymond; Shao-Ling Huang; David D McPherson; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Fast, Low-Frequency Plane-Wave Imaging for Ultrasound Contrast Imaging.

Authors:  Jiro Kusunose; Charles F Caskey
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.