Literature DB >> 20420972

Quantitative evaluation of spontaneously and surgically repaired rabbit articular cartilage using intra-articular ultrasound method in situ.

Tuomas Virén1, Simo Saarakkala, Jukka S Jurvelin, Hertta J Pulkkinen, Virpi Tiitu, Piia Valonen, Ilkka Kiviranta, Mikko J Lammi, Juha Töyräs.   

Abstract

During the last decade, a major effort has been devoted to developing surgical methods for repairing localized articular cartilage lesions. Despite some promising results no ultimate breakthrough in surgical cartilage repair has been achieved. Improvements in repair techniques would benefit from more sensitive and quantitative methods for long-term follow-up of cartilage healing. In this study, the potential of a new ultrasound technique for detecting the compositional and structural changes in articular cartilage after surgery, using recombinant human type II collagen gel and spontaneous repair was, investigated. Rabbit knee joints containing intact (n = 13) and surgically (n = 8) or spontaneously (n = 5) repaired tissue were imaged in situ at 6 months after the operation using a clinical intravascular high-frequency (40 MHz) ultrasound device. Based on the ultrasound raw data, ultrasound reflection coefficient (R), integrated ultrasound reflection coefficient (IRC), apparent integrated backscattering coefficient (AIB) and ultrasound roughness index (URI) were determined for each sample. URI was significantly higher in both repair groups than in intact cartilage (p < 0.05). The reflection parameters (R and IRC) were significantly lower in surgically repaired cartilage (p < 0.05) than in intact cartilage. Furthermore, AIB was significantly higher in surgically repaired cartilage than in intact tissue (p < 0.05). To conclude, the integrity of the rabbit articular cartilage repair could be quantitatively evaluated with the nondestructive ultrasound approach. In addition, clinically valuable qualitative information on the changes in cartilage integration, structure and composition could be extracted from the ultrasound images. In the present study, the structure and properties of repaired tissue were inferior to native tissue at 6 months after the operation. The applied ultrasound device and probes are FDA approved and, thus, applicable for the quantitative in vivo evaluation of human articular cartilage. Copyright 2010 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20420972     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.02.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of ultrasound speed in articular cartilage measured by different time-of-flight methods.

Authors:  Satoru Ohashi; Isao Ohnishi; Takuya Matsumoto; Juntaro Matsuyama; Masahiko Bessho; Kenji Tobita; Masako Kaneko; Kozo Nakamura
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 1.314

2.  Comparison of articular cartilage images assessed by high-frequency ultrasound microscope and scanning acoustic microscope.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Hagiwara; Yoshifumi Saijo; Akira Ando; Yoshito Onoda; Hideaki Suda; Eiichi Chimoto; Kouki Hatori; Eiji Itoi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Regular chondrocyte spacing is a potential cause for coherent ultrasound backscatter in human articular cartilage.

Authors:  Daniel Rohrbach; Satu I Inkinen; Jana Zatloukalová; Anke Kadow-Romacker; Antti Joukainen; Markus K Malo; Jonathan Mamou; Juha Töyräs; Kay Raum
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Nondestructive Techniques to Evaluate the Characteristics and Development of Engineered Cartilage.

Authors:  Joseph M Mansour; Zhenghong Lee; Jean F Welter
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  In Vivo Evaluation of the Potential of High-Frequency Ultrasound for Arthroscopic Examination of the Shoulder Joint.

Authors:  Jani Puhakka; Isaac O Afara; Teemu Paatela; Markus J Sormaala; Matti A Timonen; Tuomas Virén; Jukka S Jurvelin; Juha Töyräs; Ilkka Kiviranta
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Apparatus and Method for Rapid Detection of Acoustic Anisotropy in Cartilage.

Authors:  Mostafa Motavalli; Cheyenne Jones; Jim A Berilla; Ming Li; Mark D Schluchter; Joseph M Mansour; Jean F Welter
Journal:  J Med Biol Eng       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 1.553

7.  High-fidelity tissue engineering of patient-specific auricles for reconstruction of pediatric microtia and other auricular deformities.

Authors:  Alyssa J Reiffel; Concepcion Kafka; Karina A Hernandez; Samantha Popa; Justin L Perez; Sherry Zhou; Satadru Pramanik; Bryan N Brown; Won Seuk Ryu; Lawrence J Bonassar; Jason A Spector
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Monitoring the Progression of Spontaneous Articular Cartilage Healing with Infrared Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Megan P O'Brien; Madhuri Penmatsa; Uday Palukuru; Paul West; Xu Yang; Mathias P G Bostrom; Theresa Freeman; Nancy Pleshko
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Application of optical coherence tomography enhances reproducibility of arthroscopic evaluation of equine joints.

Authors:  Tytti Niemelä; Tuomas Virén; Jukka Liukkonen; David Argüelles; Nikae C R te Moller; Pia H Puhakka; Jukka S Jurvelin; Riitta-Mari Tulamo; Juha Töyräs
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 1.695

10.  Arthroscopic Ultrasound Assessment of Articular Cartilage in the Human Knee Joint: A Potential Diagnostic Method.

Authors:  Erna Kaleva; Tuomas Virén; Simo Saarakkala; Janne Sahlman; Joonas Sirola; Jani Puhakka; Teemu Paatela; Heikki Kröger; Ilkka Kiviranta; Jukka S Jurvelin; Juha Töyräs
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.634

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.