Literature DB >> 20420461

Combination of improved (18)O incorporation and multiple reaction monitoring: a universal strategy for absolute quantitative verification of serum candidate biomarkers of liver cancer.

Yan Zhao1, Wei Jia, Wei Sun, Wenhai Jin, Lihai Guo, Junying Wei, Wantao Ying, Yangjun Zhang, Yongming Xie, Ying Jiang, Fuchu He, Xiaohong Qian.   

Abstract

Stable isotope dilution-multiple reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry (SID-MRM-MS), which is an alternative to immunoassay methods such as ELISA and Western blotting, has been used to alleviate the bottlenecks of high-throughput verification of biomarker candidates recently. However, the inconvenience and high isotope consumption required to obtain stably labeled peptide impedes the broad application of this method. In our study, the (18)O-labeling method was introduced to generate stable isotope-labeled peptides instead of the Fmoc chemical synthesis and Qconcat recombinant protein synthesis methods. To make (18)O-labeling suitable for absolute quantification, we have added the following procedures: (1) RapiGest SF and microwave heating were added to increase the labeling efficiency; (2) trypsin was deactivated completely by chemical modification using tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP) and iodoacetamide (IAA) to prevent back-exchange of (18)O to (16)O, and (3) MRM parameters were optimized to maximize specificity and better distinguish between (18)O-labeled and unlabeled peptides. As a result, the (18)O-labeled peptides can be prepared in less than 1 h with satisfactory efficiency (>97%) and remained stable for 1 week, compared to traditional protocols that require 5 h for labeling with poor stability. Excellent separation of (18)O-labeled and unlabeled peptides was achieved by the MRM-MS spectrum. Finally, through the combined improvement in (18)O-labeling with multiple reaction monitoring, an absolute quantification strategy was developed to quantitatively verify hepatocellular carcinoma-related biomarker candidates, namely, vitronectin and clusterin, in undepleted serum samples. Sample preparation and capillary-HPLC analysis were optimized for high-throughput applications. The reliability of this strategy was further evaluated by method validation, with accuracy (%RE) and precision (%RSD) of less than 20% and good linearity (r(2) > 0.99), and clinical validation, which were consistent with previously reported results. In summary, our strategy can promote broader application of SID-MRM-MS for biomarkers from discovery to verification regarding the significant advantages of the convenient and flexible generation of internal standards, the reduction in the sample labeling steps, and the simple transition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20420461     DOI: 10.1021/pr9011969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  15 in total

Review 1.  Selected reaction monitoring-based proteomics: workflows, potential, pitfalls and future directions.

Authors:  Paola Picotti; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  Rapid verification of candidate serological biomarkers using gel-based, label-free multiple reaction monitoring.

Authors:  Hsin-Yao Tang; Lynn A Beer; Kurt T Barnhart; David W Speicher
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 3.  Protein analysis by shotgun/bottom-up proteomics.

Authors:  Yaoyang Zhang; Bryan R Fonslow; Bing Shan; Moon-Chang Baek; John R Yates
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Targeted mass spectrometric approach for biomarker discovery and validation with nonglycosylated tryptic peptides from N-linked glycoproteins in human plasma.

Authors:  Ju Yeon Lee; Jin Young Kim; Gun Wook Park; Mi Hee Cheon; Kyung-Hoon Kwon; Yeong Hee Ahn; Myeong Hee Moon; Hyoung-Joo Lee; Young Ki Paik; Jong Shin Yoo
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  18O-labeled proteome reference as global internal standards for targeted quantification by selected reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Jong-Seo Kim; Thomas L Fillmore; Tao Liu; Errol Robinson; Mahmud Hossain; Boyd L Champion; Ronald J Moore; David G Camp; Richard D Smith; Wei-Jun Qian
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 6.  Mass spectrometry based biomarker discovery, verification, and validation--quality assurance and control of protein biomarker assays.

Authors:  Carol E Parker; Christoph H Borchers
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 6.603

7.  Biomarker discovery for early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatitis C-infected patients.

Authors:  Mehnaz G Mustafa; John R Petersen; Hyunsu Ju; Luca Cicalese; Ned Snyder; Sigmund J Haidacher; Larry Denner; Cornelis Elferink
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 8.  Clusterin: Review of research progress and looking ahead to direction in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Peng Xiu; Xiao-Feng Dong; Xin-Ping Li; Jie Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  A label-free selected reaction monitoring workflow identifies a subset of pregnancy specific glycoproteins as potential predictive markers of early-onset pre-eclampsia.

Authors:  Richard T Blankley; Christal Fisher; Melissa Westwood; Robyn North; Philip N Baker; Michael J Walker; Andrew Williamson; Anthony D Whetton; Wanchang Lin; Lesley McCowan; Claire T Roberts; Garth J S Cooper; Richard D Unwin; Jenny E Myers
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 5.911

10.  Current status and advances in quantitative proteomic mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Valerie C Wasinger; Ming Zeng; Yunki Yau
Journal:  Int J Proteomics       Date:  2013-03-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.