Literature DB >> 20419324

Predictors of in-hospital length of stay after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: results of multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Ashwin Kurian1, Sidhbh Gallagher, Abhiman Cheeyandira, Robert Josloff.   

Abstract

AIM: To identify variables that predict in-hospital length of stay (LOS) after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR).
METHODS: Univariate analysis of patient and intraoperative variables was conducted on an operating room database of LVHRs performed from April 2001 to April 2009. Analysis was performed using either chi-square or linear trend analysis, as appropriate. A multivariate logistic regression model was created manually, to determine independent variables that predict LOS. p Value <0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: A total of 221 patients, with mean age of 56 years (range 25-88 years) underwent LVHR, for a total of 121 incisional and 100 primary ventral hernias. Of patients, 40% had incarcerated hernias and 25% had complex hernias (defined as multiple points of weakness on the anterior abdominal wall). The overall conversion rate to open operation was 6%. Mean LOS was 1.54 days (range 0-22 days). Eighty-six patients (39%) were discharged on the day of the procedure. Variables associated with significantly longer LOS on univariate analysis were incisional hernia (p = 0.000009), mesh size (p = 0.00007), complex hernia (p = 0.00009), incarcerated hernia (p = 0.0004), patient age (p = 0.0006), need for lysis of adhesions (p = 0.001), and female gender (p = 0.01). American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade >2, conversion to open procedure, and recurrent hernia were not associated with longer LOS. Four factors were independently associated with significant longer length of stay on multivariate logistic regression analysis (p < 0.05): mesh size (p = 0.00005), incarcerated hernia (p = 0.002), patient age (p = 0.018), and complex hernia (p = 0.035).
CONCLUSIONS: Mesh size, incarcerated hernia, patient age, and complex hernia predict longer length of stay after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20419324     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1048-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  23 in total

Review 1.  The treatment of complicated groin and incisional hernias.

Authors:  R E Stoppa
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: preliminary findings.

Authors:  K A LeBlanc; W V Booth
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1993-02

3.  Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia mesh repair: a prospective study.

Authors:  D Lomanto; S G Iyer; A Shabbir; W-K Cheah
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Perioperative outcomes and complications of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Juan M Perrone; Nathaniel J Soper; J Christopher Eagon; Mary E Klingensmith; Rebecca L Aft; Margaret M Frisella; L Michael Brunt
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Comparison of laparoscopic and open ventral herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  B J Ramshaw; P Esartia; J Schwab; E M Mason; R A Wilson; T D Duncan; J Miller; G W Lucas; J Promes
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  Outcome of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in correlation with obesity, type of hernia, and hernia size.

Authors:  Ioannis Raftopoulos; Daniel Vanuno; Jubin Khorsand; Joseph Ninos; G Kouraklis; Phillip Lasky
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.878

7.  Factors affecting wound complications in repair of ventral hernias.

Authors:  T J White; M C Santos; J S Thompson
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 0.688

8.  Safety of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in older adults.

Authors:  Deron J Tessier; James M Swain; Kristi L Harold
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Incisional hernioplasty with Mersilene.

Authors:  G E Wantz
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1991-02

10.  Advanced age: is it an indication or contraindication for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair?

Authors:  Alan A Saber; Mohamed H Elgamal; Tara B Mancl; Earl Norman; Michael J Boros
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  4 in total

1.  Pooled data analysis of primary ventral (PVH) and incisional hernia (IH) repair is no more acceptable: results of a systematic review and metanalysis of current literature.

Authors:  C Stabilini; G Cavallaro; P Dolce; S Capoccia Giovannini; F Corcione; M Frascio; M Sodo; G Merola; U Bracale
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair: updated Consensus Development Conference based guidelines [corrected].

Authors:  Gianfranco Silecchia; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Luis Sanchez; Graziano Ceccarelli; Armando Antinori; Luca Ansaloni; Stefano Olmi; Giovanni Carlo Ferrari; Diego Cuccurullo; Paolo Baccari; Ferdinando Agresta; Nereo Vettoretto; Micaela Piccoli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Delineation of factors associated with prolonged length of stay after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair leads to a clinical pathway and improves quality of care.

Authors:  Jennifer Leonard; Tina J Hieken; Malek Hussein; W Scott Harmsen; Mark Sawyer; John Osborn; Juliane Bingener
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  A meta-analysis comparing tacker mesh fixation with suture mesh fixation in laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  M S Sajid; U Parampalli; M R McFall
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 4.739

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.