Literature DB >> 16269300

Perioperative outcomes and complications of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Juan M Perrone1, Nathaniel J Soper, J Christopher Eagon, Mary E Klingensmith, Rebecca L Aft, Margaret M Frisella, L Michael Brunt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic techniques are being used increasingly in the repair of ventral hernias and offer the potential benefits of a shorter hospital stay, decreased wound complications, and possibly a lower recurrence rate. Despite good results from high-volume centers, significant complications may occur with this approach and the morbidity of incisional hernia repair may be underestimated. The purpose of this study was to review our experience with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) since its inception at our institution.
METHODS: Medical records of all patients who underwent LVHR at a single institution from May 2000 through December 2003 were reviewed. Preoperative and postoperative variables including complications were analyzed. Follow-up evaluation was by office visit and phone survey with assessment of patient satisfaction scores. Data are expressed as mean +/- SD.
RESULTS: A total of 121 LVHR were performed in 116 patients (52 men, 64 women; mean age, 57 +/- 13 y; mean body mass index, 35 +/- 8). Hernias were recurrent in 35 cases (28.9%), with a mean of 1.4 prior repairs (range, 1-7). The mean defect size was 109 +/- 126 cm2 and the average mesh size used was 256 +/- 192 cm2. Operating time was 147 +/- 45 minutes, and the hospital stay averaged 1.7 +/- 1 days. Twelve cases (9.9%) were converted to open operation, most commonly because of extensive adhesions. Extensive laparoscopic adhesiolysis was necessary in 29 cases (26.6%). Overall, perioperative complications occurred in 33 cases (27.3%), 13 of which (39.3%) were persistent seromas. Major complications were seen in 9 cases (7.4%). There were 4 enterotomies (3.3%): 3 occurred as a result of adhesiolysis and 1 resulted from a trocar injury; 2 were detected intraoperatively and were converted to open operation and 2 presented postoperatively. One of these patients developed sepsis and died. Follow-up evaluation was available for 83.6% of cases at a mean interval of 22 +/- 16 months after repair. The hernia recurrence rate was 9.3% (9 cases) and was detected at a median of 6 months postoperatively. The overall patient satisfaction score was high at 4.3 +/- 1.1 (scale, 1-5).
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic repair is effective for the vast majority of patients with primary or recurrent ventral hernias and results in hernia recurrence rates of less than 10%, with high patient satisfaction scores. Although seroma is the most common complication, major morbidity occurred in 7.4% of the patients in our series. Enterotomy is the most common serious complication and may result in sepsis and death.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16269300     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.06.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  50 in total

1.  Comparison of long-term outcome and quality of life after laparoscopic repair of incisional and ventral hernias with suture fixation with and without tacks: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Virinder Kumar Bansal; Mahesh C Misra; Divya Babu; Paras Singhal; Keerthi Rao; Rajesh Sagar; Subodh Kumar; S Rajeshwari; Vimi Rewari
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: is there an optimal mesh fixation technique? A systematic review.

Authors:  Emmelie Reynvoet; Ellen Deschepper; Xavier Rogiers; Roberto Troisi; Frederik Berrevoet
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Recurrences after laparoscopic repair of ventral and incisional hernia: lessons learned from 505 repairs.

Authors:  Eelco B Wassenaar; Ernst J P Schoenmaeckers; Johan T F J Raymakers; Srdjan Rakic
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Early relaparoscopy for management of suspected postoperative complications.

Authors:  Boris Kirshtein; Aviel Roy-Shapira; Sergey Domchik; Solly Mizrahi; Leonid Lantsberg
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Hybrid ventral hernia repair: technique and results.

Authors:  N Stoikes; M Quasebarth; L M Brunt
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Laparoscopic hernia complexity predicts operative time and length of stay.

Authors:  A R Butler; M J Frelich; J C Gould; M I Goldblatt
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 7.  A systematic review of the surgical treatment of large incisional hernia.

Authors:  E B Deerenberg; L Timmermans; D P Hogerzeil; J C Slieker; P H C Eilers; J Jeekel; J F Lange
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Nuttall technique: A method for subumbilical incisional hernia repair revised.

Authors:  Antonios-Apostolos K Tentes; Athanasios I Xanthoulis; Charalambos G Mirelis; Ioannis G Bougioukas; Evanthia G Tsalkidou; Konstantina A Bekiaridou; Odysseas S Korakianitis
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Laparoscopic repair of incisional hernia: Outcomes of 100 consecutive cases comprising 25 wall defects larger than 15 cm.

Authors:  Giovanni Carlo Ferrari; Angelo Miranda; Stefano Di Lernia; Fabio Sansonna; Carmelo Magistro; Dario Maggioni; Ildo Scandroglio; Andrea Costanzi; Maurizio Franzetti; Raffaele Pugliese
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Low recurrence rate of a two-layered closure repair for primary and recurrent midline incisional hernia without mesh.

Authors:  A H M Dur; D den Hartog; W E Tuinebreijer; R W Kreis; J F Lange
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.