Literature DB >> 20417780

Video-assisted mediastinoscopy compared with conventional mediastinoscopy: are we doing better?

Masaki Anraku1, Ryo Miyata, Christopher Compeau, Yaron Shargall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conventional mediastinoscopy (CM) is recently being replaced by video-assisted mediastinoscopy (VAM), with potentially better yield and better safety profile for VAM.
METHODS: All 645 mediastinoscopies (505 CM, 140 VAM) performed between May 2004 and May 2008 were reviewed. Numbers of stations biopsied, total number of lymph nodes dissected, pathology results, and complications were recorded. Patients were divided into two groups: staging for lung cancer group (n = 500) and diagnostic group (n = 145). The staging group was further analyzed, using 304 patients who eventually underwent thoracotomy to evaluate accuracy and negative predictive value of mediastinoscopy, comparing between the two methods (233 CM, 71 VAM).
RESULTS: Average age was 65 years (range, 26 to 91), and 382 were male. There was no mortality. Eight complications (1.2%) occurred, more in the VAM group (3.8%) than in the CM group (0.8%; p = 0.04). The total number of dissected nodes was higher in the VAM group than in the CM group (7.0 +/- 3.2 versus 5.0 +/- 2.8, p < 0.001), and so was the number of stations sampled (3.6 versus 2.6, p < 0.01). Sensitivity was higher for VAM (95% versus 92.2%, p = not significant), and so was the negative predictive value (98.6% versus 95.7%, p = not significant). Most false negative biopsies (8 of 11, 73 %) occurred in station 7.
CONCLUSIONS: Both methods are safe. More lymph nodes and stations were evaluated by VAM, with trend toward higher negative predictive value. The higher rate of minor complications seen with VAM might be related to a more aggressive and thorough dissection. Copyright (c) 2010 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20417780     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  9 in total

Review 1.  Does video-assisted mediastinoscopy have a better lymph node yield and safety profile than conventional mediastinoscopy?

Authors:  Miriam Adebibe; Omar A Jarral; Alex R Shipolini; David J McCormack
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-12-02

2.  Mediastinal staging in daily practice: endosonography, followed by cervical mediastinoscopy. Do we really need both?

Authors:  Ad F Verhagen; Olga C J Schuurbiers; Monika G Looijen-Salamon; Stefan M van der Heide; Henry A van Swieten; Erik H F M van der Heijden
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-07-09

Review 3.  Comparison of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and Video-Assisted Mediastinoscopy for Mediastinal Staging of Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Xiahui Ge; Wenbin Guan; Fengfeng Han; Xuejun Guo; Zhichao Jin
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2015-07-18       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 4.  Is video mediastinoscopy a safer and more effective procedure than conventional mediastinoscopy?

Authors:  Mustafa Zakkar; Carol Tan; Ian Hunt
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-11-17

Review 5.  Preoperative mediastinal lymph node staging for non-small cell lung cancer: 2014 update of the 2007 ESTS guidelines.

Authors:  Paul De Leyn; Christophe Dooms; Jaroslaw Kuzdzal; Didier Lardinois; Bernward Passlick; Ramon Rami-Porta; Akif Turna; Paul Van Schil; Frederico Venuta; David Waller; Walter Weder; Marcin Zielinski
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2014-08

6.  Mediastinoscopy: trends and practice patterns in the United States.

Authors:  Krishna S Vyas; Daniel L Davenport; Victor A Ferraris; Sibu P Saha
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.954

7.  Evaluation of mediastinoscopy in mediastinal lymph node staging for non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Ian Diebels; Jeroen M H Hendriks; Jan P Van Meerbeeck; Patrick Lauwers; Annelies Janssens; Suresh K Yogeswaran; Paul E Y Van Schil
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-01-22

8.  Clinical updates of approaches for biopsy of pulmonary lesions based on systematic review.

Authors:  Chuan-Jiang Deng; Fu-Qiang Dai; Kai Qian; Qun-You Tan; Ru-Wen Wang; Bo Deng; Jing-Hai Zhou
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 3.317

9.  Surgical mediastinal lymph node staging for non-small-cell lung carcinoma.

Authors:  Pieter W J Lozekoot; Jean H T Daemen; Robert R van den Broek; Jos G Maessen; Michiel H M Gronenschild; Yvonne L J Vissers; Karel W E Hulsewé; Erik R de Loos
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2021-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.