Literature DB >> 20416264

No between-pen transmission of foot-and-mouth disease virus in vaccinated pigs.

H J W van Roermund1, P L Eblé, M C M de Jong, A Dekker.   

Abstract

Many studies have shown transmission of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) within groups of pigs, even when vaccinated, but only limited information is available on transmission between pens. Three new experiments were carried out in two replicates, which consisted of infectious pigs housed in a central pen surrounded by four separate pens. First, all pigs were non-vaccinated and pens were separated by a walkway of 40-70 cm. Second, all pigs were non-vaccinated again but pens were adjacent. Third, this was repeated with all pigs vaccinated. From the experiments it is concluded that a single pen wall of solid wood between adjacent pens reduces the FMDV transmission 10- to 20-fold compared to within-pen transmission, for both non-vaccinated and for vaccinated pigs. Vaccination of pigs reduces the pen-to-adjacent pen R to values significantly below 1, whereas previous studies showed that it does not reduce the within-pen R(0) to values below 1. 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20416264     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.04.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  13 in total

1.  Capsid coding sequences of foot-and-mouth disease viruses are determinants of pathogenicity in pigs.

Authors:  Louise Lohse; Terry Jackson; Anette Bøtner; Graham J Belsham
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.683

2.  Vaccination of cattle only is sufficient to stop FMDV transmission in mixed populations of sheep and cattle.

Authors:  C Bravo DE Rueda; A Dekker; P L Eblé; M C M DE Jong
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 4.434

3.  Transmission dynamics of lumpy skin disease in Ethiopia.

Authors:  W Molla; K Frankena; M C M DE Jong
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.434

4.  Quantification of transmission of foot-and-mouth disease virus caused by an environment contaminated with secretions and excretions from infected calves.

Authors:  Carla Bravo de Rueda; Mart C M de Jong; Phaedra L Eblé; Aldo Dekker
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.683

Review 5.  The Pathogenesis of Foot-and-Mouth Disease in Pigs.

Authors:  Carolina Stenfeldt; Fayna Diaz-San Segundo; Teresa de Los Santos; Luis L Rodriguez; Jonathan Arzt
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-05-23

6.  Effect of spatial separation of pigs on spread of Streptococcus suis serotype 9.

Authors:  Niels Dekker; Annemarie Bouma; Ineke Daemen; Don Klinkenberg; Leo van Leengoed; Jaap A Wagenaar; Arjan Stegeman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Estimation of the transmission of foot-and-mouth disease virus from infected sheep to cattle.

Authors:  Carla Bravo de Rueda; Mart C M de Jong; Phaedra L Eblé; Aldo Dekker
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.683

8.  Potential impact of species and livestock density on the epidemic size and effectiveness of control measures for foot-and-mouth disease in Japan.

Authors:  Yoko Hayama; Takehisa Yamamoto; Sota Kobayashi; Norihiko Muroga; Toshiyuki Tsutsui
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 1.267

Review 9.  Challenges of Generating and Maintaining Protective Vaccine-Induced Immune Responses for Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus in Pigs.

Authors:  Nicholas A Lyons; Young S Lyoo; Donald P King; David J Paton
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-11-30

10.  Parameter Values for Epidemiological Models of Foot-and-Mouth Disease in Swine.

Authors:  Amy C Kinsley; Gilbert Patterson; Kimberly L VanderWaal; Meggan E Craft; Andres M Perez
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.