Literature DB >> 20414134

Recovery expectations predict recovery in workers with back pain but not other musculoskeletal conditions.

Douglas Paul Gross1, Michele Crites Battié.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
OBJECTIVE: We examined whether recovery expectations predict future return-to-work in workers filing injury claims for a variety of musculoskeletal conditions. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Recovery expectations seem to influence recovery and return-to-work after back pain, but their role in other compensable conditions is uncertain.
METHODS: All workers' compensation claimants receiving time-loss benefits for a musculoskeletal condition and undergoing return-to-work assessment were enrolled. Claimants completed a work-related recovery expectations questionnaire. Outcomes during the 1-year follow-up included surrogate indicators of timely return-to-work (days until suspension of time-loss benefits) and recovery (claim closure). Analysis included multivariable Cox regression.
RESULTS: The sample consisted of 1040 claimants of whom 298 (29%) had back pain, 461 (44%) had sprains, strains, or pain of other body parts besides the back, 234 (23%) had specific injuries such as fracture, dislocation, or amputation, and 47 (5%) had other compensable conditions such as carpal tunnel syndrome or knee internal derangement. The majority of participants had chronic conditions (mean duration >6 mo). Negative work-related recovery expectations were consistently associated with slower suspension of time-loss benefits (Hazard Ratio 0.83) and slower claim closure (Hazard Ratio 0.84) in claimants with back pain, but associations in other diagnostic groups were inconsistent and not statistically significant. Associations were slightly larger within the group of claimants with back pain of less than 3-month duration.
CONCLUSIONS: Recovery expectations provide some information for predicting future recovery in workers filing injury claims for back pain, but do not seem to predict recovery in claimants with other musculoskeletal conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20414134     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181d1e633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  16 in total

1.  Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non-specific low back pain: prognostic factor review.

Authors:  Jill A Hayden; Maria N Wilson; Richard D Riley; Ross Iles; Tamar Pincus; Rachel Ogilvie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-25

2.  What do you expect? Catastrophizing mediates associations between expectancies and pain-facilitatory processes.

Authors:  Junie S Carriere; Marc Olivier Martel; Samantha M Meints; Marise C Cornelius; Robert R Edwards
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.931

3.  Predicting improvement of functioning in disability claimants.

Authors:  K Nieuwenhuijsen; L R Cornelius; M R de Boer; J W Groothoff; M H W Frings-Dresen; J J L van der Klink; S Brouwer
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-09

4.  Development of a computer-based clinical decision support tool for selecting appropriate rehabilitation interventions for injured workers.

Authors:  Douglas P Gross; Jing Zhang; Ivan Steenstra; Susan Barnsley; Calvin Haws; Tyler Amell; Greg McIntosh; Juliette Cooper; Osmar Zaiane
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-12

Review 5.  How well do we report on compensation systems in studies of return to work: a systematic review.

Authors:  Fiona J Clay; Janneke Berecki-Gisolf; Alex Collie
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-03

6.  Vocational rehabilitation program evaluation: comparison group challenges and the role of unmeasured return-to-work expectations.

Authors:  Jeanne M Sears; Lisann R Rolle; Beryl A Schulman; Thomas M Wickizer
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-12

7.  Validation of the Readiness for Return-To-Work Scale in Outpatient Occupational Rehabilitation in Canada.

Authors:  Joanne Park; Mary Roduta Roberts; Shaniff Esmail; Fahreen Rayani; Colleen M Norris; Douglas P Gross
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2018-06

Review 8.  Expectations for Return to Work Predict Return to Work in Workers with Low Back Pain: An Individual Participant Data (IPD) Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Victoria Sullivan; Maria N Wilson; Douglas P Gross; Ole Kudsk Jensen; William S Shaw; Ivan A Steenstra; Jill A Hayden
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2022-02-12

9.  Clinically significant weight gain 1 year after occupational back injury.

Authors:  Benjamin J Keeney; Deborah Fulton-Kehoe; Thomas M Wickizer; Judith A Turner; Kwun Chuen Gary Chan; Gary M Franklin
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.162

Review 10.  Measures of patients' expectations about recovery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shanil Ebrahim; Cindy Malachowski; Mostafa Kamal El Din; Sohail M Mulla; Luis Montoya; Sheena Bance; Jason W Busse
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2015-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.