Literature DB >> 20414007

Does guideline-adherent therapy improve the outcome for early-onset breast cancer patients?

Dominic Varga1, Manfred Wischnewsky, Ziad Atassi, Regine Wolters, Verena Geyer, Kathrin Strunz, Rolf Kreienberg, Achim Woeckel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Guidelines for the treatment of early-onset breast cancer have been proposed in several countries, but to date, their impact on outcomes is unverified. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between guideline-adherent versus nonadherent treatment and recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OAS) in early-onset breast cancer patients.
METHODS: A total of 1,778 patients were included in the study, of whom 111 were 35 years or younger and 1,667 were between 36 and 55 years. RFS and OAS were compared between the two groups, with respect to multiple parameters. All survival data were adjusted for tumor characteristics and analyzed with respect to guideline adherence according to the German Step 3 guidelines.
RESULTS: Statistically significant differences between the two groups (<35 years, 36-55 years) were observed with regard to breast surgery (p = 0.002) and hormone therapy (p = 0.006). Both groups were treated identically in terms of guideline adherence concerning axillary dissection (p = 0.9), radiation therapy (p = 0.7) and chemotherapy (p = 0.556). Young breast cancer patients whose treatment adhered to guideline recommendations had increased RFS and OAS [RFS: p = 0.030, hazard ratio (HR) 2.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-7.83; OAS: p < or = 0.001, HR 2.92, 95% CI 2.01-4.23].
CONCLUSION: Guideline-adherent treatment for early-onset breast cancer patients significantly improves OAS and RFS and should therefore be demanded for all patients. Copyright 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20414007     DOI: 10.1159/000313698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology        ISSN: 0030-2414            Impact factor:   2.935


  17 in total

1.  Evaluation of time, attendance of medical staff, and resources during radiotherapy for breast cancer patients. The DEGRO-QUIRO trial.

Authors:  E Blank; N Willich; R Fietkau; W Popp; J Schaller-Steiner; H Sack; F Wenz
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Case Numbers and Process Quality in Breast Surgery in Germany: A Retrospective Analysis of Over 150,000 Patients From 2013 to 2014.

Authors:  Christina Köster; Günther Heller; Stephanie Wrede; Thomas König; Steffen Handstein; Joachim Szecsenyi
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  The Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer in Older Women With Adjuvant Therapy: A Retrospective Analysis of Data From Over 3000 Patients From the PATH Biobank, With Two-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Elke Peters; Tobias Anzeneder; Christian Jackisch; Thomas Dimpfl; Georg Kunz; Alexander Katalinic; Annika Waldmann
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 4.  Clinical practice guidelines in breast cancer.

Authors:  N Kumar Tyagi; S Dhesy-Thind
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Guideline conformity treatment in young women with early-onset breast cancer in Germany.

Authors:  Telja Pursche; Marianne Hedderich; Alessa Heinrichs; Kristin Baumann; Constanze Banz-Jansen; Achim Rody; Annika Waldmann; Dorothea Fischer
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  DEGRO practical guidelines for radiotherapy of breast cancer IV: radiotherapy following mastectomy for invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Frederik Wenz; Elena Sperk; Wilfried Budach; Jürgen Dunst; Petra Feyer; Rainer Fietkau; Wulf Haase; Wolfgang Harms; Marc D Piroth; Marie-Luise Sautter-Bihl; Felix Sedlmayer; Rainer Souchon; Christoph Fussl; Rolf Sauer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  An evidence-based health workforce model for primary and community care.

Authors:  Leonie Segal; Matthew J Leach
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Improvement of hospital care for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial (PEARL study).

Authors:  Jozette J C Stienen; Rosella P M G Hermens; Lianne Wennekes; Saskia A M van de Schans; Helena M Dekker; Nicole M A Blijlevens; Richard W M van der Maazen; Eddy M M Adang; Johan H J M van Krieken; Petronella B Ottevanger
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Analysis of Oncological Second Opinions in a Certified University Breast and Gynecological Cancer Center Regarding Consensus between the First and Second Opinion and Conformity with the Guidelines.

Authors:  Michael P Lux; Sonja Wasner; Julia Meyer; Lothar Häberle; Carolin C Hack; Sebastian Jud; Alexander Hein; Marius Wunderle; Julius Emons; Paul Gass; Peter A Fasching; Sainab Egloffstein; Jessica Krebs; Yesim Erim; Matthias W Beckmann; Christian R Loehberg
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 2.268

10.  Which breast cancer decisions remain non-compliant with guidelines despite the use of computerised decision support?

Authors:  B Séroussi; C Laouénan; J Gligorov; S Uzan; F Mentré; J Bouaud
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.