Christina Köster1, Günther Heller, Stephanie Wrede, Thomas König, Steffen Handstein, Joachim Szecsenyi. 1. AQUA-Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care GmbH, Göttingen, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Breast Surgery, Städtisches Klinikum Görlitz gGmbH, Görlitz, Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Numerous studies from around the world have shown a positive association between case numbers and the quality of medical care. The evidence to date suggests that conformity to guidelines for the treatment of patients with breast cancer is better in German hospitals that have higher case numbers. METHODS: We used data obtained by an external program for quality assurance in inpatient care (externe stationäre Qualitätssicherung, esQS) for the years 2013 and 2014 to investigate seven process indicators in the area of breast surgery, including histologic confirmation of the diagnosis before definitive treatment, axillary dissection as recommended by the guidelines, and an appropriate temporal interval between diagnosis and operation. Case numbers were categorized with the aid of various threshold values. Moreover, subgroup analyses were carried out for patients under age 65, patients in good general health, patients without lymph-node involvement, and patients with a tumor size pT0 or pT1 or an overall tumor size less than 5 cm. RESULTS: Data on 153,475 patients from 939 hospitals were analyzed. Six of seven indicators had values that were better overall, to a statistically significant extent, in hospitals with higher case numbers. Although this relationship was not consistently seen, the worst results were generally found in the category with the lowest case numbers. Similar though less striking results were obtained in the subgroup analyses. An exception to the general finding was that, in hospitals with higher case numbers, the interval between diagnosis and operation was more often longer than three weeks. CONCLUSION: Guideline adherence is higher in hospitals that treat more cases. The present study does not address the question whether this, in turn, affects morbidity or mortality. To improve process quality in peripheral hospitals, the quality assurance program should be continued.
BACKGROUND: Numerous studies from around the world have shown a positive association between case numbers and the quality of medical care. The evidence to date suggests that conformity to guidelines for the treatment of patients with breast cancer is better in German hospitals that have higher case numbers. METHODS: We used data obtained by an external program for quality assurance in inpatient care (externe stationäre Qualitätssicherung, esQS) for the years 2013 and 2014 to investigate seven process indicators in the area of breast surgery, including histologic confirmation of the diagnosis before definitive treatment, axillary dissection as recommended by the guidelines, and an appropriate temporal interval between diagnosis and operation. Case numbers were categorized with the aid of various threshold values. Moreover, subgroup analyses were carried out for patients under age 65, patients in good general health, patients without lymph-node involvement, and patients with a tumor size pT0 or pT1 or an overall tumor size less than 5 cm. RESULTS: Data on 153,475 patients from 939 hospitals were analyzed. Six of seven indicators had values that were better overall, to a statistically significant extent, in hospitals with higher case numbers. Although this relationship was not consistently seen, the worst results were generally found in the category with the lowest case numbers. Similar though less striking results were obtained in the subgroup analyses. An exception to the general finding was that, in hospitals with higher case numbers, the interval between diagnosis and operation was more often longer than three weeks. CONCLUSION: Guideline adherence is higher in hospitals that treat more cases. The present study does not address the question whether this, in turn, affects morbidity or mortality. To improve process quality in peripheral hospitals, the quality assurance program should be continued.
Authors: John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-04-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: G A Gooiker; W van Gijn; P N Post; C J H van de Velde; R A E M Tollenaar; M W J M Wouters Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 4.424
Authors: A R M Wilson; L Marotti; S Bianchi; L Biganzoli; S Claassen; T Decker; A Frigerio; A Goldhirsch; E G Gustafsson; R E Mansel; R Orecchia; A Ponti; P Poortmans; P Regitnig; M Rosselli Del Turco; E J Th Rutgers; C van Asperen; C A Wells; Y Wengström; L Cataliotti Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2013-08-19 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Sabine Siesling; Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen; Marnix de Roos; Yvonne Snel; Thijs van Dalen; Michel W Wouters; Henk Struikmans; Johannes J M van der Hoeven; John H Maduro; Otto Visser Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2014-08-09 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Laura Biganzoli; Fatima Cardoso; Marc Beishon; David Cameron; Luigi Cataliotti; Charlotte E Coles; Roberto C Delgado Bolton; Maria Die Trill; Sema Erdem; Maria Fjell; Romain Geiss; Mathijs Goossens; Christiane Kuhl; Lorenza Marotti; Peter Naredi; Simon Oberst; Jean Palussière; Antonio Ponti; Marco Rosselli Del Turco; Isabel T Rubio; Anna Sapino; Elzbieta Senkus-Konefka; Marko Skelin; Berta Sousa; Tiina Saarto; Alberto Costa; Philip Poortmans Journal: Breast Date: 2020-02-26 Impact factor: 4.380