Literature DB >> 20413039

Metabolic syndrome is associated with more pronounced impairment of left ventricle geometry and function in patients with calcific aortic stenosis: a substudy of the ASTRONOMER (Aortic Stenosis Progression Observation Measuring Effects of Rosuvastatin).

Anik Pagé1, Jean G Dumesnil, Marie-Annick Clavel, Kwan L Chan, Koon K Teo, James W Tam, Patrick Mathieu, Jean-Pierre Després, Philippe Pibarot.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between metabolic syndrome (MetS) and left ventricular (LV) geometry and function in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis (AS).
BACKGROUND: Recent experimental studies reveal that, among animals with sustained pressure overload, those with insulin resistance induced by a high-carbohydrate/high-fat diet have more severe LV hypertrophy and dysfunction compared to animals fed with standard diet.
METHODS: Among the 272 patients who were recruited in the ASTRONOMER (Aortic Stenosis Progression Observation Measuring Effects of Rosuvastatin) study, none had hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus, or coronary artery disease (exclusion criteria) at baseline. However, 33% had systemic hypertension and 27% had MetS as identified by the National Cholesterol Education Program, Adult Treatment Panel III, clinical criteria.
RESULTS: Patients with MetS had higher LV mass index (53 +/- 14 g/m(2.7) vs. 47 +/- 15 g/m(2.7); p = 0.002), relative wall thickness ratio (0.47 +/- 0.09 vs. 0.42 +/- 0.09; p = 0.001), and prevalence of LV concentric hypertrophy (42% vs. 23%) and lower peak early diastolic (8.2 +/- 2.4 cm/s vs. 9.6 +/- 3.1 cm/s, p = 0.001) and peak systolic (7.9 +/- 1.7 cm/s vs. 8.7 +/- 2.2 cm/s, p = 0.009) mitral annular myocardial velocities compared to patients without MetS. After adjustment for age, sex, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, hypertension, and valvuloarterial impedance (i.e., global LV hemodynamic load), MetS was independently associated with higher relative wall thickness ratio (p = 0.01), higher prevalence of concentric hypertrophy (p = 0.03), and reduced diastolic (p = 0.01) and systolic (p = 0.03) myocardial velocities.
CONCLUSIONS: Notwithstanding AS severity and increase in hemodynamic load, MetS is independently associated with more pronounced LV concentric hypertrophy and worse myocardial function in patients with AS, which may, in turn, predispose them to the occurrence of adverse events. (Effects of Rosuvastatin on Aortic Stenosis Progression [ASTRONOMER]; NCT00800800). Copyright (c) 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20413039     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  31 in total

Review 1.  Low gradient "severe" aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

Authors:  Alper Ozkan
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-03

Review 2.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch: an update.

Authors:  Jean G Dumesnil; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Reply to the letter from Canpolat and colleagues.

Authors:  Eser Açıkgöz; Belma Yaman; Sadık Kadri Açıkgöz; Salih Topal; Yusuf Tavil; Nuri Bulent Boyacı
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Epicardial fat amount is associated with the magnitude of left ventricular remodeling in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Augustin Coisne; Sandro Ninni; Staniel Ortmans; Laurent Davin; Kevin Kasprzak; Benjamin Longère; Claire Seunes; Amandine Coppin; Stéphanie Mouton; Hélène Ridon; Cedric Klein; Brieuc Noirot-Cosson; Bart Staels; Patrizio Lancellotti; David Montaigne; François Pontana
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Patterns of left ventricular remodeling in aortic stenosis: therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Sammy Elmariah
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-07

6.  Sex, Race, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Patients With Aortic Stenosis (from a Nationwide Inpatient Sample).

Authors:  Hind A Beydoun; May A Beydoun; Hailun Liang; Greg A Dore; Danielle Shaked; Alan B Zonderman; Shaker M Eid
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 7.  Severe and Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis Management Challenge: Knowing That We Do Not Really Know.

Authors:  Lionel Tastet; Louis Simard; Marie-Annick Clavel
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-05

Review 8.  Low-flow, low-gradient, normal ejection fraction aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Philippe Pibarot; Jean G Dumesnil
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 9.  Current management of calcific aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Brian R Lindman; Robert O Bonow; Catherine M Otto
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 10.  Calcific aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Brian R Lindman; Marie-Annick Clavel; Patrick Mathieu; Bernard Iung; Patrizio Lancellotti; Catherine M Otto; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 52.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.