Literature DB >> 20410236

Polyglutamine diseases: where does toxicity come from? what is toxicity? where are we going?

Toshiaki Takahashi1, Shinichi Katada, Osamu Onodera.   

Abstract

Although the genetic basis of polyglutamine diseases has been recognized for 20 years, their molecular basis is still unclear. We have no therapeutic strategies for these intractable neurodegenerative disorders. To adequately treat patients, we must clarify the molecular basis of polyglutamine diseases. Three main issues address their molecular pathogenesis: whether the specific structure of expanded polyglutamine diseases results in cellular toxicity; what type of dysfunction causes them; and how the toxic structure causes dysfunction, that is, the link between structure and dysfunction. For structures, expanded polyglutamine proteins undergo transformation from monomers to oligomers and inclusions. One can hypothesize that one of these structures might cause the polyglutamine disease. Although the expanded polyglutamine protein is toxic, it does not explain the selective vulnerability of specific neurons in each polyglutamine disease. The normal function of each protein, including protein-protein interaction and modification, might also be crucial for pathogenesis. For dysfunction, various molecular mechanisms have been proposed, including dysregulation of transcription, impairment of the ubiquitin-proteasome system, mitochondrial dysfunction, dysregulation of intracellular Ca(2+) homeostasis, impairment of axonal transport and genotoxic stress. These hypotheses might correlate with each other. In addition, the disease pathogenesis of might not be exclusive to one particular structure or dysfunction. To develop a therapeutic strategy for patients with polyglutamine disease, identifying the most toxic structure and the earliest event in the pathogenesis is important. We review the current understanding of the toxic structure and dysfunction by expanded polyglutamine proteins and suggest directions for future studies of polyglutamine diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20410236     DOI: 10.1093/jmcb/mjq005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 1759-4685            Impact factor:   6.216


  63 in total

Review 1.  Aggregation formation in the polyglutamine diseases: protection at a cost?

Authors:  Tiffany W Todd; Janghoo Lim
Journal:  Mol Cells       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 5.034

2.  Conformational switching in PolyGln amyloid fibrils resulting from a single amino acid insertion.

Authors:  Rick K Huang; Ulrich Baxa; Gudrun Aldrian; Abdullah B Ahmed; Joseph S Wall; Naoko Mizuno; Oleg Antzutkin; Alasdair C Steven; Andrey V Kajava
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Proteotoxicity and cardiac dysfunction.

Authors:  Patrick M McLendon; Jeffrey Robbins
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 17.367

4.  miR-25 alleviates polyQ-mediated cytotoxicity by silencing ATXN3.

Authors:  Fengzhen Huang; Li Zhang; Zhe Long; Zhao Chen; Xuan Hou; Chunrong Wang; Huirong Peng; Junling Wang; Jiada Li; Ranhui Duan; Kun Xia; De-Maw Chuang; Beisha Tang; Hong Jiang
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 5.  The emerging role of the mitochondrial-derived peptide humanin in stress resistance.

Authors:  Kelvin Yen; Changhan Lee; Hemal Mehta; Pinchas Cohen
Journal:  J Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 5.098

Review 6.  PolyQ disease: misfiring of a developmental cell death program?

Authors:  Elyse S Blum; Andrew R Schwendeman; Shai Shaham
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 20.808

7.  DNA aptamers detecting generic amyloid epitopes.

Authors:  Olga V Mitkevich; Natalia V Kochneva-Pervukhova; Elizaveta R Surina; Sergei V Benevolensky; Vitaly V Kushnirov; Michael D Ter-Avanesyan
Journal:  Prion       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 3.931

8.  A polyglutamine expansion disease protein sequesters PTIP to attenuate DNA repair and increase genomic instability.

Authors:  Hong Xiao; Zhigang Yu; Yipin Wu; John Nan; Diane E Merry; JoAnn M Sekiguchi; David O Ferguson; Andrew P Lieberman; Gregory R Dressler
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  An aggregation sensing reporter identifies leflunomide and teriflunomide as polyglutamine aggregate inhibitors.

Authors:  Rodrigo A Fuentealba; Jayne Marasa; Marc I Diamond; David Piwnica-Worms; Conrad C Weihl
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 10.  Pathogenic mechanisms and therapeutic strategies in spinobulbar muscular atrophy.

Authors:  Jason P Chua; Andrew P Lieberman
Journal:  CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.