CONTEXT: Phase response curves (PRCs) to melatonin exist, but none compare different doses of melatonin using the same protocol. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to generate a PRC to 0.5 mg of oral melatonin and compare it to our previously published 3.0 mg PRC generated using the same protocol. DESIGN AND SETTING: The study included two 5-d sessions in the laboratory, each preceded by 7-9 d of fixed sleep times. Each session started and ended with a phase assessment to measure the dim light melatonin onset (DLMO). In between were 3 d in an ultradian dim light (<150 lux)/dark cycle (light:dark, 2.5:1.5). PARTICIPANTS: Healthy adults (16 men, 18 women) between the ages of 18 and 42 yr participated in the study. INTERVENTIONS: During the ultradian days of the laboratory sessions, each participant took one pill per day at the same clock time (0.5 mg melatonin or placebo, double blind, counterbalanced). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Phase shifts to melatonin were derived by subtracting the phase shift to placebo. A PRC with time of pill administration relative to baseline DLMO and a PRC relative to midpoint of home sleep were generated. RESULTS:Maximum advances occurred when 0.5 mg melatonin was taken in the afternoon, 2-4 h before the DLMO, or 9-11 h before sleep midpoint. The time for maximum phase delays was not as distinct, but a fitted curve peaked soon after wake time. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal administration time for advances and delays is later for the lower dose of melatonin. When each dose of melatonin is given at its optimal time, both yield similarly sized advances and delays.
RCT Entities:
CONTEXT: Phase response curves (PRCs) to melatonin exist, but none compare different doses of melatonin using the same protocol. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to generate a PRC to 0.5 mg of oral melatonin and compare it to our previously published 3.0 mg PRC generated using the same protocol. DESIGN AND SETTING: The study included two 5-d sessions in the laboratory, each preceded by 7-9 d of fixed sleep times. Each session started and ended with a phase assessment to measure the dim light melatonin onset (DLMO). In between were 3 d in an ultradian dim light (<150 lux)/dark cycle (light:dark, 2.5:1.5). PARTICIPANTS: Healthy adults (16 men, 18 women) between the ages of 18 and 42 yr participated in the study. INTERVENTIONS: During the ultradian days of the laboratory sessions, each participant took one pill per day at the same clock time (0.5 mg melatonin or placebo, double blind, counterbalanced). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Phase shifts to melatonin were derived by subtracting the phase shift to placebo. A PRC with time of pill administration relative to baseline DLMO and a PRC relative to midpoint of home sleep were generated. RESULTS: Maximum advances occurred when 0.5 mg melatonin was taken in the afternoon, 2-4 h before the DLMO, or 9-11 h before sleep midpoint. The time for maximum phase delays was not as distinct, but a fitted curve peaked soon after wake time. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal administration time for advances and delays is later for the lower dose of melatonin. When each dose of melatonin is given at its optimal time, both yield similarly sized advances and delays.
Authors: Anna Wirz-Justice; Kurt Kräuchi; Christian Cajochen; Konstantin V Danilenko; Claudia Renz; Jakob M Weber Journal: J Pineal Res Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 13.007
Authors: J Arendt; C Bojkowski; S Folkard; C Franey; V Marks; D Minors; J Waterhouse; R A Wever; C Wildgruber; J Wright Journal: Ciba Found Symp Date: 1985
Authors: Sarah Forbes-Robertson; Edward Dudley; Pankaj Vadgama; Christian Cook; Scott Drawer; Liam Kilduff Journal: Sports Med Date: 2012-03-01 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Michel A Paul; Gary W Gray; Harris R Lieberman; Ryan J Love; James C Miller; Matthew Trouborst; Josephine Arendt Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2010-11-11 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Tina M Burke; Rachel R Markwald; Evan D Chinoy; Jesse A Snider; Sara C Bessman; Christopher M Jung; Kenneth P Wright Journal: Sleep Date: 2013-11-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Emily R Breslow; Andrew J K Phillips; Jean M Huang; Melissa A St Hilaire; Elizabeth B Klerman Journal: J Biol Rhythms Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 3.182