Literature DB >> 2040976

Accuracy of the newer generation intraocular lens power calculation formulas in long and short eyes.

T Olsen1, K Thim, L Corydon.   

Abstract

The accuracy of two newer generation theoretical intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas and of the empirical SRK I and II formulas was evaluated in a series of 500 IOL implantations including a series of unusually long and short eyes. The prediction error of the theoretical formulas was found to be largely unaffected by the variation in axial length and corneal power, while the prediction of the SRK I formula was less accurate in the short and long eyes. The prediction of the SRK II formula was more accurate than the SRK I in that no systematic offset error with axial length could be demonstrated. However, because of a relatively larger scatter in the long eyes and a significant bias with the corneal power, the absolute error of the SRK II formula was higher than that of the theoretical formulas in the long eyes. The higher accuracy of the newer generation theoretical formulas was attributed to their improved prediction of the pseudophakic anterior chamber depth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2040976     DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80249-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  16 in total

1.  New applications in ultrasound technology.

Authors:  H R Atta
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Light-adjustable lens: customizing correction for multifocality and higher-order aberrations.

Authors:  Christian A Sandstedt; Shiao H Chang; Robert H Grubbs; Daniel M Schwartz
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2006

3.  Refractive errors in high myopic eyes after phacovitrectomy for macular hole.

Authors:  Donghyun Jee; Yi-Ryeung Park; Kyoung In Jung; Eunchul Kim; Tae Yoon La
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Comparison of IOL power calculation formulae for pediatric eyes.

Authors:  V Vasavada; S K Shah; V A Vasavada; A R Vasavada; R H Trivedi; S Srivastava; S A Vasavada
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Prediction of refractive outcome after cataract surgery using partial coherence interferometry: comparison of SRK/T and Haigis formulae.

Authors:  Rohit Sharma; P Maharajan; S Kotta; S Maharajan
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation in paediatric cataract surgery.

Authors:  C Tromans; P M Haigh; S Biswas; I C Lloyd
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Comparing the accuracy of the new-generation intraocular lens power calculation formulae in axial myopic eyes: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hongyu Li; Zi Ye; Yu Luo; Zhaohui Li
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 2.029

8.  Development of a program for toric intraocular lens calculation considering posterior corneal astigmatism, incision-induced posterior corneal astigmatism, and effective lens position.

Authors:  Youngsub Eom; Dongok Ryu; Dae Wook Kim; Seul Ki Yang; Jong Suk Song; Sug-Whan Kim; Hyo Myung Kim
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation in primary angle-closure disease: comparison of 7 formulas.

Authors:  Min Hou; Yujie Ding; Liangping Liu; Jianbing Li; Xing Liu; Mingxing Wu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Accuracy of Holladay 2 formula using IOLMaster parameters in the absence of lens thickness value.

Authors:  Sabong Srivannaboon; Chareenun Chirapapaisan; Niphon Chirapapaisan; Buntitar Lertsuwanroj; Mathinee Chongchareon
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.