BACKGROUND: Patients with single-right ventricle (RV) physiology are at increased risk for myocardial dysfunction and mechanical dyssynchrony. Newer echocardiographic modalities may be better able to quantitate right ventricular function in this unique population. The aim of this study was to use two-dimensional speckle analysis of strain and strain rate to quantify systolic function and dyssynchrony in single-RV post-Fontan patients and compare them with values for controls. METHODS: Patients with single RV who underwent Fontan palliation and patients with normal biventricular anatomy were studied. Two-dimensional speckle echocardiography was used to measure strain, strain rate, time to peak, and longitudinal displacement in a 6-segment model of the RV. Independent t tests were used to compare group means. P values < .05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were studied in each group. There was no significant difference in age between single-RV patients and controls (6.60 +/- 2.07 vs 5.75 +/- 1.83 years, respectively). Single-RV strain values were significantly lower in all 6 segments compared with values in controls (basal interventricular septum [IVS], -14.28 +/- 7.78% vs -22.00 +/- 2.36%; mid IVS, -17.70 +/- 4.54% vs -22.99 +/- 2.71%; apical IVS, -19.46 +/- 4.97% vs -25.42 +/- 4.06%; basal RV, -22.40 +/- 5.7% vs -41.42 +/- 5.42%; mid RV, -21.20 +/- 3.21% vs -39.67 +/- 6.04%; apical RV, -20.70 +/- 4.90% vs -33.68 +/- 3.90%). Systolic strain rate and longitudinal displacement were also lower in the free wall and apical IVS in single-RV patients compared with controls. The modified Yu index for strain time to peak was longer in the single-RV patients (43.16 +/- 13.63 vs 21.72 +/- 7.25 ms). CONCLUSION: Significant differences in strain analysis between single-RV patients and patients with biventricular physiology exist at a relatively young age. Future studies are needed to determine the clinical significance of these differences. Copyright 2010 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND:Patients with single-right ventricle (RV) physiology are at increased risk for myocardial dysfunction and mechanical dyssynchrony. Newer echocardiographic modalities may be better able to quantitate right ventricular function in this unique population. The aim of this study was to use two-dimensional speckle analysis of strain and strain rate to quantify systolic function and dyssynchrony in single-RV post-Fontan patients and compare them with values for controls. METHODS:Patients with single RV who underwent Fontan palliation and patients with normal biventricular anatomy were studied. Two-dimensional speckle echocardiography was used to measure strain, strain rate, time to peak, and longitudinal displacement in a 6-segment model of the RV. Independent t tests were used to compare group means. P values < .05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were studied in each group. There was no significant difference in age between single-RV patients and controls (6.60 +/- 2.07 vs 5.75 +/- 1.83 years, respectively). Single-RV strain values were significantly lower in all 6 segments compared with values in controls (basal interventricular septum [IVS], -14.28 +/- 7.78% vs -22.00 +/- 2.36%; mid IVS, -17.70 +/- 4.54% vs -22.99 +/- 2.71%; apical IVS, -19.46 +/- 4.97% vs -25.42 +/- 4.06%; basal RV, -22.40 +/- 5.7% vs -41.42 +/- 5.42%; mid RV, -21.20 +/- 3.21% vs -39.67 +/- 6.04%; apical RV, -20.70 +/- 4.90% vs -33.68 +/- 3.90%). Systolic strain rate and longitudinal displacement were also lower in the free wall and apical IVS in single-RV patients compared with controls. The modified Yu index for strain time to peak was longer in the single-RV patients (43.16 +/- 13.63 vs 21.72 +/- 7.25 ms). CONCLUSION: Significant differences in strain analysis between single-RV patients and patients with biventricular physiology exist at a relatively young age. Future studies are needed to determine the clinical significance of these differences. Copyright 2010 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Philip Thaler Levy; Mark R Holland; Timothy J Sekarski; Aaron Hamvas; Gautam K Singh Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2013-07-20 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Philip T Levy; Aliza Machefsky; Aura A Sanchez; Meghna D Patel; Sarah Rogal; Susan Fowler; Lauren Yaeger; Angela Hardi; Mark R Holland; Aaron Hamvas; Gautam K Singh Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2015-12-30 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Daniel Forsha; Niels Risum; P Andrea Kropf; Sudarshan Rajagopal; P Brian Smith; Ronald J Kanter; Zainab Samad; Peter Sogaard; Piers Barker; Joseph Kisslo Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2014-02-06 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Chris L de Korte; Maartje M Nillesen; Anne E C M Saris; Richard G P Lopata; Johan M Thijssen; Livia Kapusta Journal: J Med Ultrason (2001) Date: 2013-12-20 Impact factor: 1.314
Authors: Philip T Levy; Aura A Sanchez Mejia; Aliza Machefsky; Susan Fowler; Mark R Holland; Gautam K Singh Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Matthew J Egan; Nazia Husain; Jack R Stines; Nasser Moiduddin; Melanie A Stein; Leif D Nelin; Clifford L Cua Journal: World J Pediatr Date: 2012-11-15 Impact factor: 2.764
Authors: Sunil J Ghelani; David M Harrild; Kimberlee Gauvreau; Tal Geva; Rahul H Rathod Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-04-18 Impact factor: 2.357