Literature DB >> 20408212

Spatio-temporal modeling of neuromagnetic data: I. Multi-source location versus time-course estimation accuracy.

S Supek1, C J Aine.   

Abstract

Numerical simulations were conducted to examine multi-source spatio-temporal resolution for neuromagnetic field distributions "measured" by a large sensor array (i.e., 135). spatio-temporal field distributions were generated by a series of two-dipole and three-dipole configurations in which source locations, orientations, and temporal dynamics of individual sources were systematically varied to represent classes of cases of interest for neuromagnetic studies. The specific goals of our numerical simulations were to examine multi-source resolution and parameter estimation accuracy as a function of 1) specific multi-source configurations; 2) different time courses, i.e., degree of temporal correlation; 3) measurement noise; 4) spatio-temporal modeling strategy (i.e., sequential fitting of instantaneous field distributions, two-step spatio-temporal modeling); 5) source modeling assumptions associated with model order; and 6) effects of initial modeling assumptions (i.e., starting points for the nonlinear minimization procedure derived by MUltiple SIgnal Classification (MUSIC), sequential instantaneous fitting, and arbitrary selections). The ability to determine the number of active sources by different approaches is compared, and the consequences on the accuracy of estimated solutions for simulated data are discussed. In all cases, model adequacy was assessed using reduced chi-square as a measure of goodness-of-fit. The present simulations demonstrate that location estimation was more robust and accurate compared to the estimation of temporal dynamics of individual sources. Implications for spatio-temporal modeling of neuromagnetic empirical data are suggested. Copyright (c) 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 20408212     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1997)5:3<139::AID-HBM1>3.0.CO;2-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  11 in total

1.  Task relevance enhances early transient and late slow-wave activity of distributed cortical sources.

Authors:  C J Aine; J M Stephen; R Christner; D Hudson; E Best
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Neurodynamic measures of functional connectivity and cognition.

Authors:  Selma Supek; Ratko Magjarevic
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Size matters: MEG empirical and simulation study on source localization of the earliest visual activity in the occipital cortex.

Authors:  Sanja Josef Golubic; Ana Susac; Veljko Grilj; Douglas Ranken; Ralph Huonker; Jens Haueisen; Selma Supek
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Face activated neurodynamic cortical networks.

Authors:  Ana Susac; Risto J Ilmoniemi; Doug Ranken; Selma Supek
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Attention modulates topology and dynamics of auditory sensory gating.

Authors:  Sanja Josef Golubic; Miljenka Jelena Jurasic; Ana Susac; Ralph Huonker; Theresa Gotz; Jens Haueisen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Same task, different strategies: how brain networks can be influenced by memory strategy.

Authors:  Lori Sanfratello; Arvind Caprihan; Julia M Stephen; Janice E Knoefel; John C Adair; Clifford Qualls; S Laura Lundy; Cheryl J Aine
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Different strategies for auditory word recognition in healthy versus normal aging.

Authors:  C J Aine; J E Bryant; J E Knoefel; J C Adair; B Hart; C H Donahue; R Montaño; R Hayek; C Qualls; D Ranken; J M Stephen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  MEG-SIM: a web portal for testing MEG analysis methods using realistic simulated and empirical data.

Authors:  C J Aine; L Sanfratello; D Ranken; E Best; J A MacArthur; T Wallace; K Gilliam; C H Donahue; R Montaño; J E Bryant; A Scott; J M Stephen
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2012-04

9.  MEG biomarker of Alzheimer's disease: Absence of a prefrontal generator during auditory sensory gating.

Authors:  Sanja Josef Golubic; Cheryl J Aine; Julia M Stephen; John C Adair; Janice E Knoefel; Selma Supek
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  EEG/MEG source imaging: methods, challenges, and open issues.

Authors:  Katrina Wendel; Outi Väisänen; Jaakko Malmivuo; Nevzat G Gencer; Bart Vanrumste; Piotr Durka; Ratko Magjarević; Selma Supek; Mihail Lucian Pascu; Hugues Fontenelle; Rolando Grave de Peralta Menendez
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.