Literature DB >> 20406996

Reconsidering the role of interaction in analyzing and reporting focus groups.

David L Morgan1.   

Abstract

In the two sections of this article, I examine aspects of the analysis and reporting of interaction in focus groups. In both sections, I argue that the essential importance of interaction for producing the data in focus groups does not correspond to any requirement that the analysis or the reporting of that data should emphasize interaction. With regard to analyzing interaction, the goals of the research should guide the analysis of the data, and those goals might or might not emphasize interaction. In particular, a great deal of focus group research is conducted for substantive and practical purposes, where the analysis typically requires little attention to the dynamics of interaction in those groups. With regard to reporting interaction, quotations from single individuals can often be the most efficient and effectives ways to accomplish an article's goals; however, I also discuss the kinds of situations where there are good reasons to report interaction among the participants. I conclude by briefly describing a different agenda for examining the importance of interaction in focus groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20406996     DOI: 10.1177/1049732310364627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Res        ISSN: 1049-7323


  30 in total

1.  Experiences and lessons learned by genetic counselors in returning secondary genetic findings to patients.

Authors:  Carly Rost; Karin M Dent; Jeffrey Botkin; Erin Rothwell
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Exploring challenges to telehealth communication by specialists in poison information.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Lee Ellington; Sally Planalp; Barbara Crouch
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2011-08-25

3.  'I think there is nothing . . . that is really comprehensive': healthcare professionals' views on recommending online resources for pain self-management.

Authors:  E Areli; H K Godfrey; M A Perry; D Hempel; B Saipe; R Grainger; L Hale; H Devan
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2020-12-18

4.  Family perceptions of quality of hospice care in the nursing home.

Authors:  Deborah Hwang; Joan M Teno; Melissa Clark; Renée Shield; Cindy Williams; David Casarett; Carol Spence
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  Health providers' perceptions of novel approaches to visualizing integrated health information.

Authors:  T Le; B Reeder; H Thompson; G Demiris
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 2.176

6.  "Why we stay": immigrants' motivations for remaining in communities impacted by anti-immigration policy.

Authors:  Carmen R Valdez; Jessa Lewis Valentine; Brian Padilla
Journal:  Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol       Date:  2013-07

7.  Consequences of Arizona's immigration policy on social capital among Mexican mothers with unauthorized immigration status.

Authors:  Carmen R Valdez; Brian Padilla; Jessa Lewis Valentine
Journal:  Hisp J Behav Sci       Date:  2013-08-01

8.  Women's Experiences With Palliative Care During Pregnancy.

Authors:  Andrea Crawford; Amelia Hopkin; Mary Rindler; Erin Johnson; Lauren Clark; Erin Rothwell
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2021-03-26

9.  Launching Medical Foster Home Programs: Key Components to Growing This Alternative to Nursing Home Placement.

Authors:  Leah M Haverhals; Chelsea E Manheim; Jacqueline Jones; Cari Levy
Journal:  J Hous Elderly       Date:  2017-02-16

10.  Patients' Experience of Attending a Binge Eating Group Program - Qualitative Evaluation of a Pilot Study.

Authors:  Kristine Rørtveit; Bodil Furnes PhD; Elin Dysvik PhD; Venke Ueland PhD
Journal:  SAGE Open Nurs       Date:  2021-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.