Literature DB >> 20406269

Why has the antidepressant-placebo difference in antidepressant clinical trials diminished over the past three decades?

Arif Khan1, Amritha Bhat, Russell Kolts, Michael E Thase, Walter Brown.   

Abstract

The increasing rate of failure of antidepressant clinical trials has led to the assertion that antidepressants do not have meaningful clinical benefits. Our hypothesis was that the decrease in antidepressant-placebo differences in antidepressant clinical trials over the past three decades could be explained by changes in research design features rather than a lack of potency of the antidepressants being tested. We collected data from 130 double blind placebo controlled antidepressant clinical trials conducted between 1981 and 2008 that included 35,122 depressed patients with 23,157 patients assigned to antidepressants and 11,965 assigned to placebo. We conducted a hierarchical regression analysis of change in HAM-D scores in antidepressant and placebo groups separately with year of publication, and research design features as independent variables. We found that antidepressant-placebo differences in antidepressant clinical trials have declined markedly over the past three decades. Decline in change scores in the antidepressant group was related to mean total baseline HAM-D scores in the trial, the version of HAM-D used, and duration of trial. Similarly, decline in change scores in the placebo group was related to mean total baseline HAM-D scores, duration of trial, and year of publication. Overall, we found that antidepressant-placebo differences were statistically significantly higher in trials that used HAM-D 21 rather than HAM-D 17 and in trials that lasted 6 weeks or less. These data suggest that, apart from the efficacy of the antidepressant being tested, factors such as baseline HAM-D scores, version of HAM-D used and duration of trial have a significant impact on outcome. As such a clinician's assessment of the usefulness of antidepressants should not be based solely on the results of such clinical trials. In the meantime there is a need for continuing research to improve the methodology of antidepressant clinical trials. These data suggest that many aspects of the design of antidepressant trials have a significant impact on outcome. Further, these data suggest that the results of more recent placebo controlled trials do not adequately inform clinicians about the potential utility of antidepressants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20406269      PMCID: PMC6493812          DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-5949.2010.00151.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther        ISSN: 1755-5930            Impact factor:   5.243


  26 in total

1.  It's only a little ice: a personal view with companion commentary.

Authors:  Stephen G Thein; Atul R Mahableshwarkar
Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci       Date:  2012-02

Review 2.  The small specific effects of antidepressants in clinical trials: what do they mean to psychiatrists?

Authors:  Michael E Thase
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.285

3.  Antidepressant treatment history and drug-placebo separation in a placebo-controlled trial in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Aimee M Hunter; Ian A Cook; Molly Tartter; Simi K Sharma; Gregory D Disse; Andrew F Leuchter
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  The responsiveness of the different versions of the Hamilton Depression Scale.

Authors:  Per Bech
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 49.548

5.  Clinic visits in late-life depression trials: effects on signal detection and therapeutic outcome.

Authors:  Bret R Rutherford; Jane Tandler; Patrick J Brown; Joel R Sneed; Steven P Roose
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.105

6.  Antidepressant-placebo differences in 16 clinical trials over 10 years at a single site: role of baseline severity.

Authors:  Arif Khan; Amritha Bhat; James Faucett; Russell Kolts; Walter A Brown
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Use of Placebo in Clinical Trials of Psychotropic Medication.

Authors:  Mehrul Hasnain; Abraham Rudnick; Weldon S Bonnell; Gary Remington; Raymond W Lam
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.356

8.  A Machine Learning Approach to Identifying Placebo Responders in Late-Life Depression Trials.

Authors:  Sigal Zilcha-Mano; Steven P Roose; Patrick J Brown; Bret R Rutherford
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.105

Review 9.  A model of placebo response in antidepressant clinical trials.

Authors:  Bret R Rutherford; Steven P Roose
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 18.112

10.  Patient Expectancy as a Mediator of Placebo Effects in Antidepressant Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Bret R Rutherford; Melanie M Wall; Patrick J Brown; Tse-Hwei Choo; Tor D Wager; Bradley S Peterson; Sarah Chung; Irving Kirsch; Steven P Roose
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 18.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.