Literature DB >> 204058

A multicentric, randomized clinical trial of Gaviscon in reflux esophagitis.

G McHardy.   

Abstract

Gaviscon tablets and the standard antacid proved equally effective in reducing the number of heartburn attacks. Chi-square tests revealed no significant difference between the two treatment groups at the end of weeks 1, 2, 3, or 4. Heartburn score was arrived at by multiplying heartburn incidence by heartburn severity. This heartburn score also indicated no significant difference between the two treatment groups at the end of the four weeks. Tabulation of the mean number of tablets consumed by patients in the two groups was made. There was no significant difference between the two groups in tablet consumption, indicating equal demand as well as equal compliance in the two groups. Esophagoscopy done before and after 28 days of treatment showed that Gaviscon and the standard antacid tablets were equally effective in each group. There was significant, and equal, decrease in the severity in the specific signs of esophagitis, friability, erosion, and ulceration in both treatment groups, as well as in such nonspecific signs as hyperemia, edema, and exudate. The validity and clinical acceptance of an alginic acid-containing agent, Gaviscon, which through a foaming action delivers a minimal dose of antacid directly at the site of acid irritation of the esophageal mucosa, has been confirmed in a multicentric, well-controlled randomized clinical trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 204058     DOI: 10.1097/00007611-197801001-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  South Med J        ISSN: 0038-4348            Impact factor:   0.954


  9 in total

1.  Alginic acid decreases postprandial upright gastroesophageal reflux. Comparison with equal-strength antacid.

Authors:  D O Castell; C B Dalton; D Becker; J Sinclair; J A Castell
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  On-demand and intermittent therapy for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: economic considerations.

Authors:  John M Inadomi
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Gastro-oesophageal reflux in infants. Evaluation of treatment by pH monitoring.

Authors:  Y Vandenplas; L Sacré-Smits
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 4.  A proposition for the diagnosis and treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in children: a report from a working group on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Working Group of the European Society of Paediatric Gastro-enterology and Nutrition (ESPGAN).

Authors:  Y Vandenplas; A Ashkenazi; D Belli; N Boige; J Bouquet; S Cadranel; J P Cezard; S Cucchiara; C Dupont; K Geboes
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 5.  Current approaches in the medical treatment of oesophageal reflux.

Authors:  J E Richter; D O Castell
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Pharmacological management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  E C Klinkenberg-Knol; H P Festen; S G Meuwissen
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Antacids. Indications and limitations.

Authors:  C K Ching; S K Lam
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Gastroesophageal reflux: clinical presentations, diagnosis and management.

Authors:  W E Waterfall; M A Craven; C J Allen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1986-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Comparison of a dimethicone/antacid (Asilone gel) with an alginate/antacid (Gaviscon liquid) in the management of reflux oesophagitis.

Authors:  H L Smart; M Atkinson
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 18.000

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.