M Shimoda1, S Chen, H Noguchi, S Matsumoto, P A Grayburn. 1. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Baylor University Medical Center, Baylor Heart and Vascular Institute, 621 North Hall St, Suite H030, Dallas, TX 75226, USA.
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Delivery of the gene for human vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF, also known as VEGFA) to both the transplanted islets and the surrounding tissue may promote islet revascularisation and survival. We previously showed the effective delivery of VEGF gene to rat myocardium by an ultrasound-mediated gene-transfer method named ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction (UTMD). Here we examined the effect of non-viral VEGF delivery using UTMD on transplanted islets in vivo. METHODS: A marginal number of human islets were transplanted into livers of mice which were a model for diabetes. Then, non-viral plasmid vectors encoding VEGF (VEGF group, n = 11) or the gene for green fluorescent protein (GFP) (GFP group, n = 7) were introduced into the host liver by UTMD. Transplantation without gene delivery was performed as a control (no-UTMD group, n = 8). Blood glucose, serum human insulin, C-peptide levels and the revascularisation in graft islets were evaluated. RESULTS: Restoration of euglycaemia occurred in 13% in the no-UTMD group and 14% in the GFP group, whereas 73% mice in the VEGF group became euglycaemic at day 30 (p < 0.05 in no-UTMD vs VEGF). Serum human insulin and C-peptide were significantly higher in the VEGF group at day 32 (insulin: no-UTMD, 17 +/- 8; GFP, 37 +/- 17; VEGF, 109 +/- 26 pmol/l, respectively, p < 0.05; C-peptide: no-UTMD, 68 +/- 38; GFP, 115 +/- 58; VEGF, 791 +/- 230 pmol/l, respectively, p < 0.05). Vessel density in graft islets was significantly higher in the VEGF group (no-UTMD, 169 +/- 36; GFP, 227 +/- 39; VEGF, 649 +/- 51 counts/mm(2), respectively, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Delivery of VEGF gene to host liver using UTMD promoted islet revascularisation after islet transplantation and improved the restoration of euglycaemia.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Delivery of the gene for humanvascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF, also known as VEGFA) to both the transplanted islets and the surrounding tissue may promote islet revascularisation and survival. We previously showed the effective delivery of VEGF gene to rat myocardium by an ultrasound-mediated gene-transfer method named ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction (UTMD). Here we examined the effect of non-viral VEGF delivery using UTMD on transplanted islets in vivo. METHODS: A marginal number of human islets were transplanted into livers of mice which were a model for diabetes. Then, non-viral plasmid vectors encoding VEGF (VEGF group, n = 11) or the gene for green fluorescent protein (GFP) (GFP group, n = 7) were introduced into the host liver by UTMD. Transplantation without gene delivery was performed as a control (no-UTMD group, n = 8). Blood glucose, serum humaninsulin, C-peptide levels and the revascularisation in graft islets were evaluated. RESULTS: Restoration of euglycaemia occurred in 13% in the no-UTMD group and 14% in the GFP group, whereas 73% mice in the VEGF group became euglycaemic at day 30 (p < 0.05 in no-UTMD vs VEGF). Serum humaninsulin and C-peptide were significantly higher in the VEGF group at day 32 (insulin: no-UTMD, 17 +/- 8; GFP, 37 +/- 17; VEGF, 109 +/- 26 pmol/l, respectively, p < 0.05; C-peptide: no-UTMD, 68 +/- 38; GFP, 115 +/- 58; VEGF, 791 +/- 230 pmol/l, respectively, p < 0.05). Vessel density in graft islets was significantly higher in the VEGF group (no-UTMD, 169 +/- 36; GFP, 227 +/- 39; VEGF, 649 +/- 51 counts/mm(2), respectively, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Delivery of VEGF gene to host liver using UTMD promoted islet revascularisation after islet transplantation and improved the restoration of euglycaemia.
Authors: T Linn; K Schneider; H P Hammes; K T Preissner; H Brandhorst; E Morgenstern; F Kiefer; R G Bretzel Journal: FASEB J Date: 2003-03-28 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Salima Hacein-Bey-Abina; Christof von Kalle; Manfred Schmidt; Françoise Le Deist; Nicolas Wulffraat; Elisabeth McIntyre; Isabelle Radford; Jean-Luc Villeval; Christopher C Fraser; Marina Cavazzana-Calvo; Alain Fischer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-01-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Shuyuan Chen; Martin H Kroll; Ralph V Shohet; Peter Frenkel; Susan A Mayer; Paul A Grayburn Journal: Echocardiography Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 1.724
Authors: Clare R Ozawa; Andrea Banfi; Nicole L Glazer; Gavin Thurston; Matthew L Springer; Peggy E Kraft; Donald M McDonald; Helen M Blau Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Shuyuan Chen; Ralph V Shohet; Raffi Bekeredjian; Peter Frenkel; Paul A Grayburn Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-07-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Ajit S Narang; Kun Cheng; James Henry; Chunxiang Zhang; Omaima Sabek; Daniel Fraga; Malak Kotb; A Osama Gaber; Ram I Mahato Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: Michael Keeney; Michael T Chung; Elizabeth R Zielins; Kevin J Paik; Adrian McArdle; Shane D Morrison; Ryan C Ransom; Namrata Barbhaiya; David Atashroo; Gunilla Jacobson; Richard N Zare; Michael T Longaker; Derrick C Wan; Fan Yang Journal: J Biomed Mater Res A Date: 2016-06-03 Impact factor: 4.396
Authors: Ann-Christina Brady; Mikaël M Martino; Eileen Pedraza; Steve Sukert; Antonello Pileggi; Camillo Ricordi; Jeffrey A Hubbell; Cherie L Stabler Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2013-08-09 Impact factor: 3.845