Literature DB >> 20402240

Visual expertise with pictures of cars correlates with RT magnitude of the car inversion effect.

Bruno Rossion1, Tim Curran.   

Abstract

In their seminal study Diamond and Carey (1986, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115 107-117) found a larger inversion effect for dog pictures in dog experts than novices, supporting a role of visual expertise in the observation of particularly large inversion effects for faces. However, subsequent studies have provided mixed results, and very few have compared the inversion effects for faces and familiar non-face object categories. Here we tested the effect of inversion on faces and cars in car experts and novices, using a delayed matching task across viewpoint changes. Inversion affected accuracy much more for pictures of faces than of cars for both groups, with no interaction between expertise and category. However, for car experts only there was a significant correlation between the magnitude of the inversion cost in RT for car pictures and the level of expertise as measured in an independent task. These observations support the view that the particularly large inversion effect found for faces is related to expert visual processes which can be at least partially recruited to process other non-face object categories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20402240     DOI: 10.1068/p6270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  10 in total

1.  The Vanderbilt Expertise Test reveals domain-general and domain-specific sex effects in object recognition.

Authors:  Rankin W McGugin; Jennifer J Richler; Grit Herzmann; Magen Speegle; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Category-specific learned attentional bias to object parts.

Authors:  Kao-Wei Chua; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Beauty is in the ease of the beholding: a neurophysiological test of the averageness theory of facial attractiveness.

Authors:  Logan T Trujillo; Jessica M Jankowitsch; Judith H Langlois
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 4.  Beyond perceptual expertise: revisiting the neural substrates of expert object recognition.

Authors:  Assaf Harel; Dwight Kravitz; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 5.  A mechanistic approach to cross-domain perceptual narrowing in the first year of life.

Authors:  Hillary Hadley; Gwyneth C Rost; Eswen Fava; Lisa S Scott
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2014-12-16

6.  Recognition and eye movements with partially hidden pictures of faces and cars in different orientations.

Authors:  Nicholas J Wade; Benjamin W Tatler
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2010-11-05

7.  Neuroanatomical correlates of visual car expertise.

Authors:  Sharon Gilaie-Dotan; Assaf Harel; Shlomo Bentin; Ryota Kanai; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Super-Memorizers Are Not Super-Recognizers.

Authors:  Meike Ramon; Sebastien Miellet; Anna M Dzieciol; Boris Nikolai Konrad; Martin Dresler; Roberto Caldara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The Development of Attentional Biases for Faces in Infancy: A Developmental Systems Perspective.

Authors:  Greg D Reynolds; Kelly C Roth
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-02-28

10.  Inversion effects in the expert classification of mammograms and faces.

Authors:  Michael D Chin; Karla K Evans; Jeremy M Wolfe; Jonathan Bowen; James W Tanaka
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-08-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.