Literature DB >> 2040202

Polymorphic HSRs in chromosome 1 of the two semispecies Mus musculus musculus and M. m. domesticus have a common origin in an ancestral population.

H Winking1, A Weith, B Boldyreff, K Moriwaki, K Fredga, W Traut.   

Abstract

HSRs (homogeneously staining regions) are the cytological correlates of DNA amplification. In the house mouse, Mus musculus, many populations are polymorphic for the presence or absence of HSRs on chromosome 1. In the semispecies M. m. domesticus the amplified DNA is present within one HSR, whereas in M. m. musculus chromosomes 1 with two HSRs are found. Hybridization of HSR-specific probes to Southern blots of HSR-carrying genomic DNAs from different localities and semispecies revealed similar complex band patterns. The remaining variation is restricted to sequences with a low degree of amplification. Variation is higher between semispecies than within one semispecies. It is assumed that HSRs are derived from one original amplification event and that unequal recombination is the mechanism underlying the length variation of HSRs present today in both semispecies. Evidence from G-banding and in situ hybridization shows that the two HSRs of M. m. musculus originated from a single HSR by means of a paracentric inversion, where one break-point was located within the single HSR and the second outside the HSR. As a consequence of the paracentric inversion the two HSRs of M. m. musculus are permanently linked together. Since exchange of genes between the two semispecies is restricted to a narrow hybrid zone the amplification that gave rise to the HSR most probably occurred prior to the divergence into the semispecies M. m. domesticus and M. m. musculus about 1 million years ago.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2040202     DOI: 10.1007/bf00337242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  14 in total

1.  A high resolution in situ hybridization technique for the direct visualization of labeled G-banded early metaphase and prophase chromosomes.

Authors:  M E Chandler; J J Yunis
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1978

2.  Genetic features of major geographical isolates of Mus musculus.

Authors:  K Moriwaki; N Miyashita; H Suzuki; Y Kurihara; H Yonekawa
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.291

3.  A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin.

Authors:  A T Sumner
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 3.905

4.  Absence of Y-chromosome introgression across the hybrid zone between Mus musculus domesticus and Mus musculus musculus.

Authors:  F Vanlerberghe; B Dod; P Boursot; M Bellis; F Bonhomme
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  A method for preparing chromosomes from peripheral blood in the mouse.

Authors:  K L Triman; M T Davisson; T H Roderick
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1975

6.  Amplified dihydrofolate reductase genes are localized to a homogeneously staining region of a single chromosome in a methotrexate-resistant Chinese hamster ovary cell line.

Authors:  J H Nunberg; R J Kaufman; R T Schimke; G Urlaub; L A Chasin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Evidence for in situ amplification of a germ line homogeneously staining region in the mouse.

Authors:  B Boldyreff; H Winking; A Weith; W Traut
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1988

8.  An extra segment in chromosome 1 of wild Mus musculus: a C-band positive homogeneously staining region.

Authors:  W Traut; H Winking; S Adolph
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1984

9.  A cellular oncogene (c-Ki-ras) is amplified, overexpressed, and located within karyotypic abnormalities in mouse adrenocortical tumour cells.

Authors:  M Schwab; K Alitalo; H E Varmus; J M Bishop; D George
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1983 Jun 9-15       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Flow of mitochondrial DNA across a species boundary.

Authors:  S D Ferris; R D Sage; C M Huang; J T Nielsen; U Ritte; A C Wilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  9 in total

1.  Origin of the chromosome 1 HSR of the house mouse detected by CGH.

Authors:  W Traut; D Weichenhan; U Eickhoff; H Winking
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  A highly amplified mouse gene is homologous to the human interferon-responsive Sp100 gene encoding an autoantigen associated with nuclear dots.

Authors:  T Grötzinger; K Jensen; H H Guldner; T Sternsdorf; C Szostecki; M Schwab; L Savelyeva; B Reich; H Will
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 3.  Meiotic drive in female mice: an essay.

Authors:  A Ruvinsky
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.957

4.  Evolution of a B2 tagged sequence from a long-range repeat family in the genus Mus.

Authors:  C Plass; T Hellwig; W Traut; H Winking
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.957

5.  The maternal-effect, selfish genetic element Medea is associated with a composite Tc1 transposon.

Authors:  Marcé D Lorenzen; Andreas Gnirke; Jonathan Margolis; Jeffrey Garnes; Margie Campbell; Jeffrey J Stuart; Rajat Aggarwal; Stephen Richards; Yoonseong Park; Richard W Beeman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Variability of the chromosome 1 HSR of "Asian" type in the wild mouse (Mus musculus).

Authors:  K V Korobitsyna; L V Yakimenko
Journal:  Dokl Biol Sci       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb

7.  Meiotic synapsis of homogeneously staining regions (HSRs) in chromosome 1 of Mus musculus.

Authors:  H Winking; C Reuter; W Traut
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.239

8.  Evolution of a long-range repeat family in chromosome 1 of the genus Mus.

Authors:  S Agulnik; C Plass; W Traut; H Winking
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.957

9.  Selfing is the safest sex for Caenorhabditis tropicalis.

Authors:  Luke M Noble; John Yuen; Lewis Stevens; Nicolas Moya; Riaad Persaud; Marc Moscatelli; Jacqueline L Jackson; Gaotian Zhang; Rojin Chitrakar; L Ryan Baugh; Christian Braendle; Erik C Andersen; Hannah S Seidel; Matthew V Rockman
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 8.140

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.