Literature DB >> 20399324

Barrett's surveillance identifies patients with early esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Timothy Wong1, Jianmein Tian, Anil Bernard Nagar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Barrett's surveillance for dysplasia is recommended, but few studies have documented the benefit of endoscopic surveillance for dysplasia or cancer.
OBJECTIVES: Using a retrospective study design, we aim to demonstrate the impact of a Barrett's surveillance program on the stage of esophageal adenocarcinoma and identify factors for progression of metaplasia to cancer.
SUBJECTS: The Institutional Review Board at Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare approved the study. We report a retrospective review of a prospectively followed Barrett's cohort in a surveillance program and compared their outcome with patients with a new diagnosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma, identified at the same center between 1999 and 2005.
RESULTS: There were 248 patients with Barrett's esophagus entered into a surveillance program from 1999 to 2005. During the surveillance period of 987 patient-years, 5 (0.5% patient-year) patients developed esophageal adenocarcinoma. During the same period, 46 patients were diagnosed with new-onset esophageal adenocarcinoma outside of our surveillance program. Only 5% of these patients had a history of gastroesophageal reflux disease. There were 248 patients who underwent a mean number of 2.7+/-1.7 upper endoscopic procedures, with 26 (10%) patients developing dysplasia. Compared with nonsurveillance, more patients had early stage of cancer in the surveillance group (P <.001). All 5 patients with cancer diagnosed from Barrett's esophagus surveillance endoscopy were alive, compared with 20 of 46 (43%) patients with cancer diagnosed outside of the surveillance program. The length of Barrett's segment >3 cm was found to be associated with development of dysplasia, P=.004 (odds ratio 1.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.34).
CONCLUSION: Patients with Barrett's esophagus undergoing endoscopic surveillance benefit from early-stage cancer diagnosis. Progression to adenocarcinoma is low, but long-segment and high-grade dysplasias have an increased risk of cancer. A significant number of patients with newly diagnosed esophageal adenocarcinoma do not complain of gastroesophageal reflux disease and are therefore not investigated for Barrett's esophagus nor entered into surveillance. Patients and physicians can use this information in making a decision about surveillance. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20399324     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.10.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  15 in total

1.  miR-200 family expression is downregulated upon neoplastic progression of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Cameron M Smith; David I Watson; Mary P Leong; George C Mayne; Michael Z Michael; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Damian J Hussey
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Performance measures for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy quality improvement initiative.

Authors:  Raf Bisschops; Miguel Areia; Emmanuel Coron; Daniela Dobru; Bernd Kaskas; Roman Kuvaev; Oliver Pech; Krish Ragunath; Bas Weusten; Pietro Familiari; Dirk Domagk; Roland Valori; Michal F Kaminski; Cristiano Spada; Michael Bretthauer; Cathy Bennett; Carlo Senore; Mário Dinis-Ribeiro; Matthew D Rutter
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-08-21       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 3.  Endoscopic risk factors for neoplastic progression in patients with Barrett's oesophagus.

Authors:  Angela Bureo Gonzalez; Jacques Jghm Bergman; Roos E Pouw
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 4.623

4.  Validation of a biomarker panel in Barrett's esophagus to predict progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  S Eluri; E Klaver; L C Duits; S A Jackson; J J Bergman; N J Shaheen
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.429

Review 5.  Point-Counterpoint: Screening and Surveillance for Barrett's Esophagus, Is It Worthwhile?

Authors:  Fouad Otaki; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 6.  Epidemiology of Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Thomas M Runge; Julian A Abrams; Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.806

7.  Improved specimen adequacy using jumbo biopsy forceps in patients with Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Jan Martinek; Jana Maluskova; Magdalena Stefanova; Inna Tuckova; Stepan Suchanek; Zuzana Vackova; Jana Krajciova; Marek Kollar; Miroslav Zavoral; Julius Spicak
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Management controversies in Barrett's oesophagus.

Authors:  L Max Almond; Hugh Barr
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 9.  The Effect of Endoscopic Surveillance in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Don Chamil Codipilly; Apoorva Krishna Chandar; Siddharth Singh; Sachin Wani; Nicholas J Shaheen; John M Inadomi; Amitabh Chak; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 10.  Biomarkers in Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma: predictors of progression and prognosis.

Authors:  Chin-Ann J Ong; Pierre Lao-Sirieix; Rebecca C Fitzgerald
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.