Literature DB >> 20395459

Novel information theory based method for superimposition of lateral head radiographs and cone beam computed tomography images.

W Jacquet1, E Nyssen, P Bottenberg, P de Groen, B Vande Vannet.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to introduce a novel alignment criterion, focus mutual information (FMI), for the superimposition of lateral cephalometric radiographs and three dimensional (3D) cone beam computed images as well as the assessment of the alignment characteristics of the new method and comparison of the novel methodology with the region of interest (ROI) approach.
METHODS: Implementation of a FMI criterion-based methodology that only requires the approximate indication of stable structures in one single image. The robustness of the method was first addressed in a phantom experiment comparing the new technique with a ROI approach. Two consecutive cephalometric radiographs were then obtained, one before and one after functional twin block application. These images were then superimposed using alignment by FMI where the following were focused on, in several ways: (1) cranial base and acoustic meatus, (2) palatal plane and (3) mandibular symphysis. The superimposed images were subtracted and coloured. The applicability to cone beam CT (CBCT) is illustrated by the alignment of CBCT images acquired before and after craniofacial surgery.
RESULTS: The phantom experiment clearly shows superior alignment when compared to the ROI approach (Wilcoxon n = 17, Z = -3.290, and P = 0.001), and robustness with respect to the choice of parameters (one-sample t-test n = 50, t = -12.355, and P = 0.000). The treatment effects are revealed clearly in the subtraction image of well-aligned cephalometric radiographs. The colouring scheme of the subtraction image emphasises the areas of change and visualizes the remodelling of the soft tissue.
CONCLUSIONS: FMI allows for cephalometry without tracing, it avoids the error inherent to the use of landmarks and the interaction of the practitioner is kept to a minimum. The robustness to focal distribution variations limits the influence of possible examiner inaccuracy.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20395459      PMCID: PMC3520224          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/58457270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  12 in total

1.  Comparison of landmark identification in traditional versus computer-aided digital cephalometry.

Authors:  Y J Chen; S K Chen; H F Chang; K C Chen
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Image analysis and superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models.

Authors:  Lucia H S Cevidanes; Martin A Styner; William R Proffit
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  ROI-based image registration for digital subtraction radiography.

Authors:  Won-Jin Yi; Min-Suk Heo; Sam-Sun Lee; Soon-Chul Choi; Kyung-Hoe Huh
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2005-09-21

Review 4.  Automatic cephalometric analysis.

Authors:  Rosalia Leonardi; Daniela Giordano; Francesco Maiorana; Concetto Spampinato
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Cephalometric superimpositions.

Authors:  Yan Gu; James A McNamara
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Phosphor-stimulated computed cephalometry: reliability of landmark identification.

Authors:  K F Lim; K W Foong
Journal:  Br J Orthod       Date:  1997-11

7.  Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years.

Authors:  A Björk; V Skieller
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Evaluation of differential growth and orthodontic treatment outcome by regional cephalometric superpositions.

Authors:  S S Efstratiadis; G Cohen; J Ghafari
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Accuracy of digital and analogue cephalometric measurements assessed with the sandwich technique.

Authors:  Margherita Santoro; Karim Jarjoura; Thomas J Cangialosi
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Validity of cephalometric landmarks. An experimental study on human skulls.

Authors:  T T Tng; T C Chan; U Hägg; M S Cooke
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparison of linear and angular measurements using two-dimensional conventional methods and three-dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo.

Authors:  U Oz; K Orhan; N Abe
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 2.  Cone beam computed tomography in paediatric dentistry: overview of recent literature.

Authors:  J K M Aps
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2013-06

3.  The application and accuracy of feature matching on automated cephalometric superimposition.

Authors:  Yiran Jiang; Guangying Song; Xiaonan Yu; Yuanbo Dou; Qingfeng Li; Siqi Liu; Bing Han; Tianmin Xu
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 1.930

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.