Literature DB >> 20394921

Classification of subtrochanteric femoral fractures.

C L Loizou1, I McNamara, K Ahmed, G A Pryor, M J Parker.   

Abstract

A review of the literature identified 15 different classification methods for subtrochanteric femoral fractures. Only eight of those classifications defined the area of bone, which constituted a subtrochanteric fracture. The actual length of femur defined as the subtrochanteric zone varied from 3 cm up to the level of the femoral isthmus. There was no agreement between the different classifications regarding the proximal and distal border or for those fractures, which traverse anatomical boundaries. In the various classifications, fractures were subdivided into 2-15 subgroups. The majority of the identified studies were unable to find the classifications useful in either determining treatment or predicting the outcome after treatment. We subdivided subtrochanteric fractures into three types based on the degree of fracture comminution. We examined the inter- and intra-observer agreement of our recommended classification. One orthopaedic consultant, one specialist hip fracture surgeon, two trainee registrar orthopaedic surgeons and one specialty trainee in orthopaedics, on two different occasions, 8 weeks apart, independently classified the radiographs of 20 patients with a subtrochanteric fracture. The mean kappa value for inter- and intra-observer variation was 0.71 and 0.79, respectively, with both showing substantial agreement and, therefore, this simpler classification is recommended. Based on the review of previous classification methods, we also recommend that the subtrochanteric zone be defined as the one in which the fracture line crossing the femur is predominantly within the area of bone extending 5 cm below the lower border of the lesser trochanter. 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20394921     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.02.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  24 in total

1.  Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation in the treatment of subtrochanteric femur fractures: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jie Wang; Haomin Li; Haobo Jia; Xinlong Ma
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.511

Review 2.  Classifications in Brief: The Russell-Taylor Classification of Subtrochanteric Hip Fracture.

Authors:  James M Rizkalla; Scott J B Nimmons; Alan L Jones
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The impact of subtrochanteric fracture criteria on hip fracture classification.

Authors:  S Y Huang; C D Grimsrud; J Provus; M Hararah; M Chandra; B Ettinger; J C Lo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Authors' reply to Comment on "Does auxiliary cerclage wiring provide intrinsic stability in cephalomedullary nailing of trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures?"

Authors:  Julia Rehme; Alexander Woltmann; Andreas Brand; Christian von Rüden
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Comment on "does auxiliary cerclage wiring provide intrinsic stability in cephalomedullary nailing of trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures".

Authors:  Neng-Jun Wang; Bin-Fei Zhang; Yu-Min Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  [Subtrochanteric femoral fractures].

Authors:  B Ulmar; S Simon; A Eschler; T Mittlmeier
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Extra-articular proximal femur fractures in children and adolescents treated by elastic stable intramedullary nailing.

Authors:  Flavia Alberghina; Antonio Andreacchio; Mattia Cravino; Matteo Paonessa; Federico Canavese
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  The benefit of wire cerclage stabilisation of the medial hinge in intramedullary nailing for the treatment of subtrochanteric femoral fractures: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Thorben Müller; Tobias Topp; Christian A Kühne; Gershon Gebhart; Steffen Ruchholtz; Ralph Zettl
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Evaluation of inter- and intra-observer reliability of current classification systems for subtrochanteric femoral fractures.

Authors:  Ahmet İmerci; Nevres Hurriyet Aydogan; Kursad Tosun
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-11-06

10.  Racial/ethnic differences in hip and diaphyseal femur fractures.

Authors:  J C Lo; P Zheng; C D Grimsrud; M Chandra; B Ettinger; A Budayr; G Lau; M M Baur; R L Hui; R Neugebauer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.