Erica N Roberson1, Jon C Gould, Arnold Wald. 1. University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53705, USA. enroberson@wisc.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Morbidly obese women have markedly high rates of urinary and fecal incontinence. Weight loss reduces prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence; however, the effect of weight loss on fecal incontinence is unknown. AIMS: The aim of this study was to document the prevalence of urinary and fecal incontinence in subjects who underwent bariatric surgery and associated weight loss. METHODS: We mailed a detailed survey to all 404 adults who underwent bariatric surgery at the University of Wisconsin prior to May 2006. Type and severity of urinary and fecal incontinence was obtained using previously validated questionnaires. Perceived effect of surgery on bowel and bladder function was also assessed. RESULTS: Forty-eight percent (193) of the surveys were returned. Urinary incontinence was reported in 72% of the women, 39% of whom perceived improvement after surgery. Only 21% of the men reported urinary incontinence. In contrast, fecal incontinence was common in both men and women; 48% of the women and 42% of the men reported liquid stool incontinence and 21% of the women and 30% of the men reported solid stool incontinence. Fifty-five percent of the women and 31% of the men with fecal incontinence perceived worsening after surgery. Women with diarrhea were four times more likely to report fecal incontinence (P<0.0001). Furthermore, women who perceived worsening of diarrhea after surgery were significantly more likely to have fecal incontinence (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Both fecal and urinary incontinence were common after bariatric surgery. Risk factors for fecal incontinence in women after bariatric surgery include diarrhea and worsening of diarrhea; we suggest that such surgery may uncover prior weaknesses in the continence mechanism.
BACKGROUND: Morbidly obesewomen have markedly high rates of urinary and fecal incontinence. Weight loss reduces prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence; however, the effect of weight loss on fecal incontinence is unknown. AIMS: The aim of this study was to document the prevalence of urinary and fecal incontinence in subjects who underwent bariatric surgery and associated weight loss. METHODS: We mailed a detailed survey to all 404 adults who underwent bariatric surgery at the University of Wisconsin prior to May 2006. Type and severity of urinary and fecal incontinence was obtained using previously validated questionnaires. Perceived effect of surgery on bowel and bladder function was also assessed. RESULTS: Forty-eight percent (193) of the surveys were returned. Urinary incontinence was reported in 72% of the women, 39% of whom perceived improvement after surgery. Only 21% of the men reported urinary incontinence. In contrast, fecal incontinence was common in both men and women; 48% of the women and 42% of the men reported liquid stool incontinence and 21% of the women and 30% of the men reported solid stool incontinence. Fifty-five percent of the women and 31% of the men with fecal incontinence perceived worsening after surgery. Women with diarrhea were four times more likely to report fecal incontinence (P<0.0001). Furthermore, women who perceived worsening of diarrhea after surgery were significantly more likely to have fecal incontinence (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Both fecal and urinary incontinence were common after bariatric surgery. Risk factors for fecal incontinence in women after bariatric surgery include diarrhea and worsening of diarrhea; we suggest that such surgery may uncover prior weaknesses in the continence mechanism.
Authors: Adil E Bharucha; Alan R Zinsmeister; G Richard Locke; Barbara M Seide; Kimberly McKeon; Cathy D Schleck; L Joseph Melton Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Lars Sjöström; Anna-Karin Lindroos; Markku Peltonen; Jarl Torgerson; Claude Bouchard; Björn Carlsson; Sven Dahlgren; Bo Larsson; Kristina Narbro; Carl David Sjöström; Marianne Sullivan; Hans Wedel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-12-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Lester R Curtin; Margaret A McDowell; Carolyn J Tabak; Katherine M Flegal Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-04-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Holly E Richter; Kathryn L Burgio; Ronald H Clements; Patricia S Goode; David T Redden; R Edward Varner Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Chi Chiung Grace Chen; Patrick Gatmaitan; Sidney Koepp; Matthew D Barber; Bipan Chand; Philip R Schauer; Stacy A Brethauer Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2008-10-29 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Anne Sophie Schneck; Rodolphe Anty; Albert Tran; Audrey Hastier; Imed Ben Amor; Jean Gugenheim; Antonio Iannelli; Thierry Piche Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 4.129