Literature DB >> 20392969

TightRope versus fiber mesh tape augmentation of acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: a biomechanical study.

Chad C Zooker1, Brent G Parks, Kacey L White, Richard Y Hinton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The standard Weaver-Dunn reconstruction of the acromioclavicular (AC) joint does not provide adequate superoinferior or anteroposterior stability. Augmentation methods such as tape cerclage have been described. A new method of augmentation with the Arthrex TightRope is available. HYPOTHESIS: A Weaver-Dunn reconstruction augmented with the TightRope will provide superior superoinferior and anteroposterior stability to the AC joint as compared with a Weaver-Dunn reconstruction augmented with Mersilene fiber tape cerclage. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: Six matched pairs of cadaveric shoulders underwent Weaver-Dunn AC joint reconstructions and were randomly assigned to receive either the TightRope device or tape cerclage augmentation. Translation in 2 planes was measured in the intact state under load and after 1 load cycle and 2000 load cycles.
RESULTS: TightRope-augmented repair showed less superoinferior translation (mean +/- standard error) than cerclage-augmented repair in initially repaired (1.6 +/- 0.1 mm vs 5.0 +/- 1.1 mm, P = 0.03) and cyclically loaded (2.1 +/- 0.1 mm vs 5.8 +/- 1.2 mm, P = 0.02) conditions. TightRope repairs were stiffer than the native ligaments in the superoinferior plane. Less anteroposterior translation was observed with TightRope versus cerclage augmentation (initially repaired, 6.8 +/- 0.4 mm vs 18.8 +/- 2.6 mm, P < 0.001; cycled, 15.0 +/- 1.4 mm vs 28.3 +/- 2.7 mm, P = 0.01), but neither method maintained normal anteroposterior laxity after 1500 cycles compared with the intact state.
CONCLUSION: Superoinferior and anteroposterior translation with TightRope augmentation was lower than with tape cerclage. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: TightRope augmentation of a Weaver-Dunn procedure could provide increased protection for AC joint reconstruction, allowing for earlier mobilization and more aggressive early rehabilitation. The potential clinical effect of additional tightening in the superoinferior direction beyond that of the native joint remains an issue for further study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20392969     DOI: 10.1177/0363546509359064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  18 in total

1.  Biomechanical properties of repairs for dislocated AC joints using suture button systems with integrated tendon augmentation.

Authors:  Knut Beitzel; Elifho Obopilwe; David M Chowaniec; Michael D Nowak; Bryan T Hanypsiak; James J Guerra; Robert A Arciero; Augustus D Mazzocca
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-31       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Arthroscopic-Assisted Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction Using the TightRope Device With Allograft Augmentation: Surgical Technique.

Authors:  Rachel M Frank; Scott W Trenhaile
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-07-06

3.  [Epidemiology, anatomy, biomechanics and imaging of acromioclavicular joint injuries].

Authors:  M Wellmann; T Smith
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 4.  Current concepts in management of ACJ injuries.

Authors:  Akshay Phadke; Nik Bakti; Rajesh Bawale; Bijayendra Singh
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-04-01

Review 5.  Management of acute unstable acromioclavicular joint injuries.

Authors:  Luis Natera Cisneros; Juan Sarasquete Reiriz
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-08-19

6.  Value of additional acromioclavicular cerclage for horizontal stability in complete acromioclavicular separation: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Tim Saier; Arne J Venjakob; Philipp Minzlaff; Peter Föhr; Filip Lindell; Andreas B Imhoff; Stephan Vogt; Sepp Braun
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  [Acromioclavicular injuries in professional athletes].

Authors:  M Tauber
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Clinical and radiological results after coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation using three different techniques. A retrospective study.

Authors:  Alberto Vascellari; Stefano Schiavetti; Giuseppe Battistella; Enrico Rebuzzi; Nicolò Coletti
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2015-11-03

Review 9.  Nonanatomic and Suture-Based Coracoclavicular Joint Stabilization Techniques Provide Adequate Stability at a Lower Cost of Implants in Biomechanical Studies When Compared With Anatomic Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Theodorakys Marín Fermín; Jean Michel Hovsepian; Víctor Miguel Rodrigues Fernandes; Ioannis Terzidis; Emmanouil Papakostas; Jason Koh
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-02-24

10.  [Short-term effectiveness of Endobutton plate in reconstruction of Lisfranc ligament].

Authors:  Wei Wang; Yongfei Fan; Chaoyu Liu; Wenqiang Xu; Xiulin Ma; Jian Xu; Haiyang Yu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-11-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.