PURPOSE: To evaluate a custom-developed software for analyzing malignant degrees of small peripheral adenocarcinomas on volumetric CT data compared to pathological prognostic factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-six adenocarcinomas with a diameter of 2cm or less from 46 patients were included. The custom-developed software can calculate the volumetric rates of solid parts to whole nodules even though solid parts show a punctate distribution, and automatically classify nodules into the following six types according to the volumetric rates of solid parts: type 1, pure ground-glass opacity (GGO); type 2, semiconsolidation; type 3, small solid part with a GGO halo; type 4, mixed type with an area that consisted of GGO and solid parts which have air-bronchogram or show a punctate distribution; type 5, large solid part with a GGO halo; and type 6, pure solid type. The boundary between solid portion and GGO on CT was decided using two threshold selection methods for segmenting gray-scale images. A radiologist also examined two-dimensional rates of solid parts to total opacity (2D%solid) which was already confirmed with previous reports. RESULTS: There were good agreements between the classification determined by the software and radiologists (weighted kappa=0.778-0.804). Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that both 2D%solid and computer-automated classification were significantly useful in estimating lymphatic invasion (p=0.0007, 0.0027), vascular invasion (p=0.003, 0.012), and pleural invasion (p=0.021, 0.025). CONCLUSION: Using our custom-developed software, it is feasible to predict the pathological prognostic factors of small peripheral adenocarcinomas.
PURPOSE: To evaluate a custom-developed software for analyzing malignant degrees of small peripheral adenocarcinomas on volumetric CT data compared to pathological prognostic factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-six adenocarcinomas with a diameter of 2cm or less from 46 patients were included. The custom-developed software can calculate the volumetric rates of solid parts to whole nodules even though solid parts show a punctate distribution, and automatically classify nodules into the following six types according to the volumetric rates of solid parts: type 1, pure ground-glass opacity (GGO); type 2, semiconsolidation; type 3, small solid part with a GGO halo; type 4, mixed type with an area that consisted of GGO and solid parts which have air-bronchogram or show a punctate distribution; type 5, large solid part with a GGO halo; and type 6, pure solid type. The boundary between solid portion and GGO on CT was decided using two threshold selection methods for segmenting gray-scale images. A radiologist also examined two-dimensional rates of solid parts to total opacity (2D%solid) which was already confirmed with previous reports. RESULTS: There were good agreements between the classification determined by the software and radiologists (weighted kappa=0.778-0.804). Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that both 2D%solid and computer-automated classification were significantly useful in estimating lymphatic invasion (p=0.0007, 0.0027), vascular invasion (p=0.003, 0.012), and pleural invasion (p=0.021, 0.025). CONCLUSION: Using our custom-developed software, it is feasible to predict the pathological prognostic factors of small peripheral adenocarcinomas.
Authors: Ernst Th Scholten; Colin Jacobs; Bram van Ginneken; Sarah van Riel; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Matthijs Oudkerk; Harry J de Koning; Nanda Horeweg; Mathias Prokop; Hester A Gietema; Willem P Th M Mali; Pim A de Jong Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-10-07 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Hua Wang; Matthew B Schabath; Ying Liu; Anders E Berglund; Gregory C Bloom; Jongphil Kim; Olya Stringfield; Edward A Eikman; Donald L Klippenstein; John J Heine; Steven A Eschrich; Zhaoxiang Ye; Robert J Gillies Journal: Clin Lung Cancer Date: 2015-05-27 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Yoganand Balagurunathan; Virendra Kumar; Yuhua Gu; Jongphil Kim; Hua Wang; Ying Liu; Dmitry B Goldgof; Lawrence O Hall; Rene Korn; Binsheng Zhao; Lawrence H Schwartz; Satrajit Basu; Steven Eschrich; Robert A Gatenby; Robert J Gillies Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 4.056
Authors: Young Joo Suh; Jae Hoon Lee; Jin Hur; Sae Rom Hong; Dong Jin Im; Yun Jung Kim; Yoo Jin Hong; Hye Jeong Lee; Young Jin Kim; Byoung Wook Choi Journal: Yonsei Med J Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 2.759