Literature DB >> 20392137

Strain-related differences after experimental traumatic brain injury in rats.

Wendy Murdock Reid1, Andrew Rolfe, David Register, Joseph E Levasseur, Severn B Churn, Dong Sun.   

Abstract

The present study directly compares the effects of experimental brain injury in two commonly used rat strains: Fisher 344 and Sprague-Dawley. We previously found that Fisher rats have a higher mortality rate and more frequent seizure attacks at the same injury level than Sprague-Dawley rats. Although strain differences in rats are commonly accepted as contributing to variability among studies, there is a paucity of literature addressing strain influence in experimental neurotrauma. Therefore this study compares outcome measures in two rat strains following lateral fluid percussion injury. Fisher 344 and Sprague-Dawley rats were monitored for changes in physiological measurements, intracranial pressure, and electroencephalographic activity. We further analyzed neuronal degeneration and cell death in the injured brain using Fluoro-Jade-B (FJB) histochemistry and caspase-3 immunostaining. Behavioral studies using the beam walk and Morris water maze were conducted to characterize strain differences in both motor and cognitive functional recovery following injury. We found that Fisher rats had significantly higher intracranial pressure, prolonged seizure activity, increased FJB-positive staining in the injured cortex and thalamus, and increased caspase-3 expression than Sprague-Dawley rats. On average, Fisher rats displayed a greater amount of total recording time in seizure activity and had longer ictal durations. The Fisher rats also had increased motor deficits, correlating with the above results. In spite of these results, Fisher rats performed better on cognitive tests following injury. The results demonstrate that different rat strains respond to injury differently, and thus in preclinical neurotrauma studies strain influence is an important consideration when evaluating outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20392137      PMCID: PMC2942905          DOI: 10.1089/neu.2010.1270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  37 in total

1.  Modulation of CaM kinase II activity is coincident with induction of status epilepticus in the rat pilocarpine model.

Authors:  Michael W Singleton; William H Holbert; Anh Tuyet Lee; James M Bracey; Severn B Churn
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.864

2.  A persistent change in subcellular distribution of calcineurin following fluid percussion injury in the rat.

Authors:  Jonathan E Kurz; Robert J Hamm; Richard H Singleton; John T Povlishock; Severn B Churn
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 3.  Basic mechanisms in status epilepticus: role of calcium in neuronal injury and the induction of epileptogenesis.

Authors:  Robert J DeLorenzo; David A Sun
Journal:  Adv Neurol       Date:  2006

4.  Differences in forebrain activation in two strains of rat at rest and after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Pamela E Paulson; A L Gorman; Robert P Yezierski; Kenneth L Casey; Thomas J Morrow
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 5.  Lateral fluid percussion brain injury: a 15-year review and evaluation.

Authors:  Hilaire J Thompson; Jonathan Lifshitz; Niklas Marklund; M Sean Grady; David I Graham; David A Hovda; Tracy K McIntosh
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  Intracranial pressure changes during fluid percussion, controlled cortical impact and weight drop injury in rats.

Authors:  F Clausen; L Hillered
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  Inbred mouse strains as a tool to analyze hippocampal neuronal loss after brain injury: a stereological study.

Authors:  Brent M Witgen; Jonathan Lifshitz; M Sean Grady
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.269

8.  Experimental stroke: ischaemic lesion volume and oedema formation differ among rat strains (a comparison between Wistar and Sprague-Dawley rats using MRI).

Authors:  M Walberer; E Stolz; C Müller; C Friedrich; C Rottger; F Blaes; M Kaps; M Fisher; G Bachmann; T Gerriets
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.471

9.  A comparison of Lewis and Fischer rat strains on autoshaping (sign-tracking), discrimination reversal learning and negative auto-maintenance.

Authors:  David N Kearns; Maria A Gomez-Serrano; Stanley J Weiss; Anthony L Riley
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  The effect of postinjury kindled seizures on cognitive performance of traumatically brain-injured rats.

Authors:  R J Hamm; B R Pike; M D Temple; D M O'Dell; B G Lyeth
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.330

View more
  19 in total

1.  Harmonization of lateral fluid-percussion injury model production and post-injury monitoring in a preclinical multicenter biomarker discovery study on post-traumatic epileptogenesis.

Authors:  Xavier Ekolle Ndode-Ekane; Cesar Santana-Gomez; Pablo M Casillas-Espinosa; Idrish Ali; Rhys D Brady; Gregory Smith; Pedro Andrade; Riikka Immonen; Noora Puhakka; Matthew R Hudson; Emma L Braine; Sandy R Shultz; Richard J Staba; Terence J O'Brien; Asla Pitkänen
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 3.045

Review 2.  Animal modelling of traumatic brain injury in preclinical drug development: where do we go from here?

Authors:  Niklas Marklund; Lars Hillered
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Increased intracranial pressure after diffuse traumatic brain injury exacerbates neuronal somatic membrane poration but not axonal injury: evidence for primary intracranial pressure-induced neuronal perturbation.

Authors:  Audrey D Lafrenaye; Melissa J McGinn; John T Povlishock
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 6.200

4.  Sustained survival and maturation of adult neural stem/progenitor cells after transplantation into the injured brain.

Authors:  Dong Sun; Marinella Gugliotta; Andrew Rolfe; Wendy Reid; A Rory McQuiston; Wenhui Hu; Harold Young
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Long-lasting suppression of acoustic startle response after mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Kevin C H Pang; Swamini Sinha; Pelin Avcu; Jessica J Roland; Neil Nadpara; Bryan Pfister; Mathew Long; Vijayalakshmi Santhakumar; Richard J Servatius
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 6.  Animal models of traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Ye Xiong; Asim Mahmood; Michael Chopp
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Naturally occurring variation in the Glutathione-S-Transferase 4 gene determines neurodegeneration after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Faiez Al Nimer; Mikael Ström; Rickard Lindblom; Shahin Aeinehband; Bo-Michael Bellander; Jens R Nyengaard; Olle Lidman; Fredrik Piehl
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 8.401

8.  Unique Sensory and Motor Behavior in Thy1-GFP-M Mice before and after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Timothy D Faw; Jessica K Lerch; Tyler T Thaxton; Rochelle J Deibert; Lesley C Fisher; D Michele Basso
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 5.269

9.  Survival Following Traumatic Brain Injury in Drosophila Is Increased by Heterozygosity for a Mutation of the NF-κB Innate Immune Response Transcription Factor Relish.

Authors:  Laura C Swanson; Edna A Trujillo; Gene H Thiede; Rebeccah J Katzenberger; Evgenia Shishkova; Joshua J Coon; Barry Ganetzky; David A Wassarman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  A systematic review of large animal models of combined traumatic brain injury and hemorrhagic shock.

Authors:  Andrew R Mayer; Andrew B Dodd; Meghan S Vermillion; David D Stephenson; Irshad H Chaudry; Denis E Bragin; Andrew P Gigliotti; Rebecca J Dodd; Benjamin C Wasserott; Priyank Shukla; Rachel Kinsler; Sheila M Alonzo
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.