Literature DB >> 15900397

Intracranial pressure changes during fluid percussion, controlled cortical impact and weight drop injury in rats.

F Clausen1, L Hillered.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In traumatic brain injury research, the fluid percussion injury (FPI) model in the rat is widely used. The injury is graded based on indirect criteria, such as the extracranial pressure wave and/or physiological responses to the injury. We designed this study to investigate if the extracranially monitored pressure in the FPI-device corresponded to the actual intracranial situation. Severe controlled cortical impact (CCI) and severe weight drop injury (WDI) were studied for comparison.
METHOD: We tested the correlation between the extra- and intracranial pressures during severe FPI in rat (2.6-2.9 atm), using pressure probes (diameter 0.34 mm) with high frequency (500 Hz) and high pressure range (1-5 atm). The probes were inserted into either of the lateral ventricles in FPI and in the contralateral lateral ventricle in CCI and WDI to compare the ictal pressure pulses between the models.
FINDINGS: FPI showed a time lag between the extracranial, intracranial ipsilateral and intracranial contralateral pressure curves respectively, reflecting the different distances between the pressure source and the individual pressure probes. There was a high degree of correlation (r = 0.994, p<0.0001) between the extra- and intracranial pressure pulses, once corrected for the time lag. We found no significant differences between the extracranial and the intracranial peak pressure in either ventricle in FPI. In CCI and WDI the contralateral pressure pulses were significantly smaller than in FPI. CCI resulted in higher pressure peaks than WDI, due to higher impact velocity.
CONCLUSIONS: The extracranial pressure pulse appears to be a good estimate of the intraventricular pressure pulse generated during FPI. Severe CCI and WDI generated intraventricular pressure pulses of much lower magnitude than FPI, explaining the lesser degree of brain stem involvement in the former models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15900397     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-005-0550-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  12 in total

1.  A behavioral and histological comparison of fluid percussion injury and controlled cortical impact injury to the rat sensorimotor cortex.

Authors:  Todd C Peterson; William R Maass; Jordan R Anderson; Gail D Anderson; Michael R Hoane
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Chronic treatment with galantamine rescues reversal learning in an attentional set-shifting test after experimental brain trauma.

Authors:  Ihuoma Njoku; Hannah L Radabaugh; Melissa A Nicholas; Lindsay A Kutash; Darik A O'Neil; Ian P Marshall; Jeffrey P Cheng; Anthony E Kline; Corina O Bondi
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 5.330

3.  Strain-related differences after experimental traumatic brain injury in rats.

Authors:  Wendy Murdock Reid; Andrew Rolfe; David Register; Joseph E Levasseur; Severn B Churn; Dong Sun
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.269

4.  Decompressive craniectomy reduces white matter injury after controlled cortical impact in mice.

Authors:  Stuart H Friess; Jodi B Lapidus; David L Brody
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Acute Non-Convulsive Status Epilepticus after Experimental Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats.

Authors:  Pedro Andrade; Ivette Banuelos-Cabrera; Niina Lapinlampi; Tomi Paananen; Robert Ciszek; Xavier Ekolle Ndode-Ekane; Asla Pitkänen
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  Intracranial pressure and experimental model of diffuse brain injury in rats.

Authors:  Martin Blaha; Juraj Schwab; Olga Vajnerova; Michal Bednar; Ludek Vajner; Tichy Michal
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-01-31

7.  PEG-PDLLA micelle treatment improves axonal function of the corpus callosum following traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Xingjie Ping; Kewen Jiang; Seung-Young Lee; Ji-Xing Cheng; Xiaoming Jin
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 8.  Defining and Managing Pain in Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injury Research.

Authors:  Christina M Larson; George L Wilcox; Carolyn A Fairbanks
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 0.982

9.  Reduced GABAergic inhibition in the basolateral amygdala and the development of anxiety-like behaviors after mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Camila P Almeida-Suhett; Eric M Prager; Volodymyr Pidoplichko; Taiza H Figueiredo; Ann M Marini; Zheng Li; Lee E Eiden; Maria F M Braga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Characterization of pressure distribution in penetrating traumatic brain injuries.

Authors:  Johan Davidsson; Mårten Risling
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.