Literature DB >> 20391536

Estimating false discovery rates for peptide and protein identification using randomized databases.

Gregory Hather1, Roger Higdon, Andrew Bauman, Priska D von Haller, Eugene Kolker.   

Abstract

MS-based proteomics characterizes protein contents of biological samples. The most common approach is to first match observed MS/MS peptide spectra against theoretical spectra from a protein sequence database and then to score these matches. The false discovery rate (FDR) can be estimated as a function of the score by searching together the protein sequence database and its randomized version and comparing the score distributions of the randomized versus nonrandomized matches. This work introduces a straightforward isotonic regression-based method to estimate the cumulative FDRs and local FDRs (LFDRs) of peptide identification. Our isotonic method not only performed as well as other methods used for comparison, but also has the advantages of being: (i) monotonic in the score, (ii) computationally simple, and (iii) not dependent on assumptions about score distributions. We demonstrate the flexibility of our approach by using it to estimate FDRs and LFDRs for protein identification using summaries of the peptide spectra scores. We reconfirmed that several of these methods were superior to a two-peptide rule. Finally, by estimating both the FDRs and LFDRs, we showed for both peptide and protein identification, moderate FDR values (5%) corresponded to large LFDR values (53 and 60%).

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20391536     DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200900619

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteomics        ISSN: 1615-9853            Impact factor:   3.984


  14 in total

1.  The necessity of adjusting tests of protein category enrichment in discovery proteomics.

Authors:  Brenton Louie; Roger Higdon; Eugene Kolker
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Meta-analysis for protein identification: a case study on yeast data.

Authors:  Roger Higdon; Winston Haynes; Eugene Kolker
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2010-06

3.  Many overlapping peptides for protein hydrogen exchange experiments by the fragment separation-mass spectrometry method.

Authors:  Leland Mayne; Zhong-Yuan Kan; Palaniappan Sevugan Chetty; Alec Ricciuti; Benjamin T Walters; S Walter Englander
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Accurate peptide fragment mass analysis: multiplexed peptide identification and quantification.

Authors:  Chad R Weisbrod; Jimmy K Eng; Michael R Hoopmann; Tahmina Baker; James E Bruce
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  Accurate Estimation of Context-Dependent False Discovery Rates in Top-Down Proteomics.

Authors:  Richard D LeDuc; Ryan T Fellers; Bryan P Early; Joseph B Greer; Daniel P Shams; Paul M Thomas; Neil L Kelleher
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 5.911

6.  MOPED 2.5--an integrated multi-omics resource: multi-omics profiling expression database now includes transcriptomics data.

Authors:  Elizabeth Montague; Larissa Stanberry; Roger Higdon; Imre Janko; Elaine Lee; Nathaniel Anderson; John Choiniere; Elizabeth Stewart; Gregory Yandl; William Broomall; Natali Kolker; Eugene Kolker
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2014-06

7.  MOPED enables discoveries through consistently processed proteomics data.

Authors:  Roger Higdon; Elizabeth Stewart; Larissa Stanberry; Winston Haynes; John Choiniere; Elizabeth Montague; Nathaniel Anderson; Gregory Yandl; Imre Janko; William Broomall; Simon Fishilevich; Doron Lancet; Natali Kolker; Eugene Kolker
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 4.466

8.  Design and initial characterization of the SC-200 proteomics standard mixture.

Authors:  Andrew Bauman; Roger Higdon; Sean Rapson; Brenton Loiue; Jason Hogan; Robin Stacy; Alberto Napuli; Wenjin Guo; Wesley van Voorhis; Jared Roach; Vincent Lu; Elizabeth Landorf; Elizabeth Stewart; Natali Kolker; Frank Collart; Peter Myler; Gerald van Belle; Eugene Kolker
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2011-01-21

9.  Competition between PARP-1 and Ku70 control the decision between high-fidelity and mutagenic DNA repair.

Authors:  M N Paddock; A T Bauman; R Higdon; E Kolker; S Takeda; A M Scharenberg
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2011-01-20

10.  A Protein Standard That Emulates Homology for the Characterization of Protein Inference Algorithms.

Authors:  Matthew The; Fredrik Edfors; Yasset Perez-Riverol; Samuel H Payne; Michael R Hoopmann; Magnus Palmblad; Björn Forsström; Lukas Käll
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.