OBJECTIVES: Estimating equations using serum creatinine (SCr) are often used to assess glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Such creatinine (Cr)-based formulae may produce biased estimates of GFR when using Cr measurements that have not been calibrated to reference laboratories. In this paper, we sought to examine the degree of this variation in Cr assays in several laboratories associated with academic medical centers affiliated with the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study; to consider how best to correct for this variation, and to quantify the impact of such corrections on eligibility for participation in CRIC. Variability of Cr is of particular concern in the conduct of CRIC, a large multicenter study of subjects with chronic renal disease, because eligibility for the study depends on Cr-based assessment of GFR. METHODS: A library of 5 large volume plasma specimens from apheresis patients was assembled, representing levels of plasma Cr from 0.8 to 2.4 mg/dl. Samples from this library were used for measurement of Cr at each of the 14 CRIC laboratories repetitively over time. We used graphical displays and linear regression methods to examine the variability in Cr, and used linear regression to develop calibration equations. We also examined the impact of the various calibration equations on the proportion of subjects screened as potential participants who were actually eligible for the study. RESULTS: There was substantial variability in Cr assays across laboratories and over time. We developed calibration equations for each laboratory; these equations varied substantially among laboratories and somewhat over time in some laboratories. The laboratory site contributed the most to variability (51% of the variance unexplained by the specimen) and variation with time accounted for another 15%. In some laboratories, calibration equations resulted in differences in eligibility for CRIC of as much as 20%. CONCLUSIONS: The substantial variability in SCr assays across laboratories necessitates calibration of SCr measures to a common standard. Failing to do so may substantially affect study eligibility and clinical interpretations when they are determined by Cr-based estimates of GFR. 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.
OBJECTIVES: Estimating equations using serum creatinine (SCr) are often used to assess glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Such creatinine (Cr)-based formulae may produce biased estimates of GFR when using Cr measurements that have not been calibrated to reference laboratories. In this paper, we sought to examine the degree of this variation in Cr assays in several laboratories associated with academic medical centers affiliated with the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study; to consider how best to correct for this variation, and to quantify the impact of such corrections on eligibility for participation in CRIC. Variability of Cr is of particular concern in the conduct of CRIC, a large multicenter study of subjects with chronic renal disease, because eligibility for the study depends on Cr-based assessment of GFR. METHODS: A library of 5 large volume plasma specimens from apheresis patients was assembled, representing levels of plasma Cr from 0.8 to 2.4 mg/dl. Samples from this library were used for measurement of Cr at each of the 14 CRIC laboratories repetitively over time. We used graphical displays and linear regression methods to examine the variability in Cr, and used linear regression to develop calibration equations. We also examined the impact of the various calibration equations on the proportion of subjects screened as potential participants who were actually eligible for the study. RESULTS: There was substantial variability in Cr assays across laboratories and over time. We developed calibration equations for each laboratory; these equations varied substantially among laboratories and somewhat over time in some laboratories. The laboratory site contributed the most to variability (51% of the variance unexplained by the specimen) and variation with time accounted for another 15%. In some laboratories, calibration equations resulted in differences in eligibility for CRIC of as much as 20%. CONCLUSIONS: The substantial variability in SCr assays across laboratories necessitates calibration of SCr measures to a common standard. Failing to do so may substantially affect study eligibility and clinical interpretations when they are determined by Cr-based estimates of GFR. 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Authors: Andrew S Levey; Josef Coresh; Tom Greene; Jane Marsh; Lesley A Stevens; John W Kusek; Frederick Van Lente Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2007-03-01 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Gary L Myers; W Greg Miller; Josef Coresh; James Fleming; Neil Greenberg; Tom Greene; Thomas Hostetter; Andrew S Levey; Mauro Panteghini; Michael Welch; John H Eckfeldt Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2005-12-06 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Josef Coresh; Brad C Astor; Geraldine McQuillan; John Kusek; Tom Greene; Frederick Van Lente; Andrew S Levey Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Josef Coresh; Elizabeth Selvin; Lesley A Stevens; Jane Manzi; John W Kusek; Paul Eggers; Frederick Van Lente; Andrew S Levey Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-11-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Lesley A Stevens; Jane Manzi; Andrew S Levey; Jing Chen; Amy E Deysher; Tom Greene; Emilio D Poggio; Christopher H Schmid; Michael W Steffes; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Frederick Van Lente; Josef Coresh Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Ana C Ricardo; Wei Yang; Daohang Sha; Lawrence J Appel; Jing Chen; Marie Krousel-Wood; Anjella Manoharan; Susan Steigerwalt; Jackson Wright; Mahboob Rahman; Sylvia E Rosas; Milda Saunders; Kumar Sharma; Martha L Daviglus; James P Lash Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2018-12-03 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Kathleen D Liu; Wei Yang; Alan S Go; Amanda H Anderson; Harold I Feldman; Michael J Fischer; Jiang He; Radhakrishna R Kallem; John W Kusek; Stephen R Master; Edgar R Miller; Sylvia E Rosas; Susan Steigerwalt; Kaixiang Tao; Matthew R Weir; Chi-Yuan Hsu Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2014-10-11 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Amanda H Anderson; Wei Yang; Raymond R Townsend; Qiang Pan; Glenn M Chertow; John W Kusek; Jeanne Charleston; Jiang He; RadhaKrishna Kallem; James P Lash; Edgar R Miller; Mahboob Rahman; Susan Steigerwalt; Matthew Weir; Jackson T Wright; Harold I Feldman Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2015-02-17 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Meyeon Park; Chi-yuan Hsu; Yongmei Li; Rakesh K Mishra; Martin Keane; Sylvia E Rosas; Daniel Dries; Dawei Xie; Jing Chen; Jiang He; Amanda Anderson; Alan S Go; Michael G Shlipak Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2012-08-30 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Nisha Bansal; Amanda Hyre Anderson; Wei Yang; Robert H Christenson; Christopher R deFilippi; Rajat Deo; Daniel L Dries; Alan S Go; Jiang He; John W Kusek; James P Lash; Dominic Raj; Sylvia Rosas; Myles Wolf; Xiaoming Zhang; Michael G Shlipak; Harold I Feldman Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2014-10-02 Impact factor: 10.121