Literature DB >> 20386565

Usefulness of the top-scoring pairs of genes for prediction of prostate cancer progression.

H Zhao1, C J Logothetis, I P Gorlov.   

Abstract

Prediction of cancer progression after radical prostatectomy is one of the most challenging problems in the management of prostate cancer. Gene-expression profiling is widely used to identify genes associated with such progression. Usually candidate genes are identified according to a gene-by-gene comparison of expression. Recent reports suggested that relative expression of a gene pair more efficiently predicts cancer progression than single-gene analysis does. The top-scoring pair (TSP) algorithm classifies phenotypes according to the relative expression of a pair of genes. We applied the TSP approach to predict, which patients would experience systemic tumor progression after radical prostatectomy. Relative expression of TPD52L2/SQLE and CEACAM1/BRCA1 gene pairs identified those patients with more than 99% specificity but relatively low sensitivity (approximately 10%). These two gene pairs were validated in three independent data sets. In addition, combining two pairs of genes improved sensitivity without compromising specificity. Functional annotation of the TSP genes showed that they cluster by a limited number of biological functions and pathways, suggesting that relatively lower expression of genes from specific pathways can predict cancer progression. In conclusion, comparative analysis of the expression of two genes may be a simple and effective classifier for prediction of prostate cancer progression. In summary, the TSP approach can be used to identify patients whose prostate cancer will progress after they undergo radical prostatectomy. Two gene pairs can predict which men would experience progression to the metastatic form of the disease. However, because our analysis was based on a relatively small number of genes, a larger study will be needed to identify the best predictors of disease outcome overall.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20386565      PMCID: PMC4136464          DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2010.9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis        ISSN: 1365-7852            Impact factor:   5.554


  28 in total

1.  Gene expression analysis of prostate cancers.

Authors:  Jian-Hua Luo; Yan Ping Yu; Kathleen Cieply; Fan Lin; Petrina Deflavia; Rajiv Dhir; Sydney Finkelstein; George Michalopoulos; Michael Becich
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.784

Review 2.  Androgen deprivation therapy and estrogen deficiency induced adverse effects in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  S J Freedland; J Eastham; N Shore
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 3.  Dietary flavonoids: effects on xenobiotic and carcinogen metabolism.

Authors:  Young Jin Moon; Xiaodong Wang; Marilyn E Morris
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2005-11-11       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  Association of CYP17, GSTP1, and PON1 polymorphisms with the risk of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Cinzia Antognelli; Luigi Mearini; Vincenzo Nicola Talesa; Antonella Giannantoni; Ettore Mearini
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2005-05-15       Impact factor: 4.104

5.  Simple decision rules for classifying human cancers from gene expression profiles.

Authors:  Aik Choon Tan; Daniel Q Naiman; Lei Xu; Raimond L Winslow; Donald Geman
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Replication of prostate cancer risk loci on 8q24, 11q13, 17q12, 19q33, and Xp11 in African Americans.

Authors:  Stanley Hooker; Wenndy Hernandez; Hankui Chen; Christiane Robbins; Jada Benn Torres; Chiledum Ahaghotu; John Carpten; Rick A Kittles
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 4.104

7.  Gene expression correlates of clinical prostate cancer behavior.

Authors:  Dinesh Singh; Phillip G Febbo; Kenneth Ross; Donald G Jackson; Judith Manola; Christine Ladd; Pablo Tamayo; Andrew A Renshaw; Anthony V D'Amico; Jerome P Richie; Eric S Lander; Massimo Loda; Philip W Kantoff; Todd R Golub; William R Sellers
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 31.743

8.  Comparison of biochemical relapse-free survival between primary Gleason score 3 and primary Gleason score 4 for biopsy Gleason score 7 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Burdick; Chandana A Reddy; James Ulchaker; Kenneth Angermeier; Andrew Altman; Nabil Chehade; Arul Mahadevan; Patrick A Kupelian; Eric A Klein; Jay P Ciezki
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 9.  The role of nitric oxide in cancer.

Authors:  Weiming Xu; Li Zhi Liu; Marilena Loizidou; Mohamed Ahmed; Ian G Charles
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 25.617

10.  Molecular features of hormone-refractory prostate cancer cells by genome-wide gene expression profiles.

Authors:  Kenji Tamura; Mutsuo Furihata; Tatsuhiko Tsunoda; Shingo Ashida; Ryo Takata; Wataru Obara; Hiroki Yoshioka; Yataro Daigo; Yasutomo Nasu; Hiromi Kumon; Hiroyuki Konaka; Mikio Namiki; Keiichi Tozawa; Kenjiro Kohri; Nozomu Tanji; Masayoshi Yokoyama; Toru Shimazui; Hideyuki Akaza; Yoichi Mizutani; Tsuneharu Miki; Tomoaki Fujioka; Taro Shuin; Yusuke Nakamura; Hidewaki Nakagawa
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  16 in total

1.  Cholesterol Metabolism and Prostate Cancer Lethality.

Authors:  Konrad H Stopsack; Travis A Gerke; Jennifer A Sinnott; Kathryn L Penney; Svitlana Tyekucheva; Howard D Sesso; Swen-Olof Andersson; Ove Andrén; James R Cerhan; Edward L Giovannucci; Lorelei A Mucci; Jennifer R Rider
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Robust two-gene classifiers for cancer prediction.

Authors:  Xiaosheng Wang
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 5.736

Review 3.  Obesity and Prostate Cancer: A Focused Update on Active Surveillance, Race, and Molecular Subtyping.

Authors:  Adriana C Vidal; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Induction of Lumen Formation in a Three-dimensional Model of Mammary Morphogenesis by Transcriptional Regulator ID4: ROLE OF CaMK2D IN THE EPIGENETIC REGULATION OF ID4 GENE EXPRESSION.

Authors:  Tung Nguyen; John E Shively
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  An argument for mechanism-based statistical inference in cancer.

Authors:  Donald Geman; Michael Ochs; Nathan D Price; Cristian Tomasetti; Laurent Younes
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2014-11-09       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Tumor protein D54 is a negative regulator of extracellular matrix-dependent migration and attachment in oral squamous cell carcinoma-derived cell lines.

Authors:  Yoshiki Mukudai; Seiji Kondo; Atsushi Fujita; Yasuto Yoshihama; Tatsuo Shirota; Satoru Shintani
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 6.730

7.  Multiclass cancer classification based on gene expression comparison.

Authors:  Sitan Yang; Daniel Q Naiman
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2014-08

8.  Computational medicine: translating models to clinical care.

Authors:  Raimond L Winslow; Natalia Trayanova; Donald Geman; Michael I Miller
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 17.956

9.  Expression and significance of squalene epoxidase in squamous lung cancerous tissues and pericarcinoma tissues.

Authors:  Hong-Yan Zhang; Hong-Mei Li; Zhuang Yu; Xiao-Yun Yu; Kang Guo
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  TAZ expression as a prognostic indicator in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hiu-Fung Yuen; Cian M McCrudden; Yu-Han Huang; Jill M Tham; Xiaoqian Zhang; Qi Zeng; Shu-Dong Zhang; WanJin Hong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.