Literature DB >> 20385995

Pharmacogenetic assessment of toxicity and outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with LV5FU2, FOLFOX, and FOLFIRI: FFCD 2000-05.

Valérie Boige1, Jean Mendiboure, Jean-Pierre Pignon, Marie-Anne Loriot, Marine Castaing, Michel Barrois, David Malka, David-Alexandre Trégouët, Olivier Bouché, Delphine Le Corre, Isabelle Miran, Claire Mulot, Michel Ducreux, Philippe Beaune, Pierre Laurent-Puig.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim was to investigate whether germline polymorphisms within candidate genes known or suspected to be involved in fluorouracil (FU), oxaliplatin, and irinotecan pathways were associated with toxicity and clinical outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Blood samples from 349 patients included in the Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive 2000-05 randomized trial, which compared FU plus leucovorin (LV5FU2) followed by FU, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) followed by FU, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI; sequential arm) with FOLFOX followed by FOLFIRI (combination arm) in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival, were collected. Twenty polymorphisms within the DPD, TS, MTHFR, ERCC1, ERCC2, GSTP1, GSTM1, GSTT1, and UGT1A1 genes were genotyped.
RESULTS: The ERCC2-K751QC allele was independently associated with an increased risk of FOLFOX-induced grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity (P = .01). In the sequential arm, TS-5'UTR3RG and GSTT1 alleles were independently associated with response to LV5FU2 (P = .009) and FOLFOX (P = .01), respectively. The effect of oxaliplatin on tumor response increased with the number of MTHFR-1298C alleles (test for trend, P = .008). The PFS benefit from first-line FOLFOX was restricted to patients with 2R/2R (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.68) or 2R/3R (HR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.82) TS-5'UTR genotypes, respectively. Conversely, patients with the TS-5'UTR 3R/3R genotype did not seem to benefit from the adjunction of oxaliplatin (HR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.40; trend between the three HRs, P = .006).
CONCLUSION: A pharmacogenetic approach may be a useful strategy for personalizing and optimizing chemotherapy in mCRC patients and deserves confirmation in additional prospective studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20385995     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.2106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  50 in total

Review 1.  Part 2: pharmacogenetic variability in drug transport and phase I anticancer drug metabolism.

Authors:  Maarten J Deenen; Annemieke Cats; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-05-31

2.  5-Fluorouracil-based chemotherapy for colorectal cancer and MTHFR/MTRR genotypes.

Authors:  Barbara Pardini; Rajiv Kumar; Alessio Naccarati; Jan Novotny; Rashmi B Prasad; Asta Forsti; Kari Hemminki; Pavel Vodicka; Justo Lorenzo Bermejo
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  PharmGKB summary: very important pharmacogene information for GSTT1.

Authors:  Caroline F Thorn; Yuan Ji; Richard M Weinshilboum; Russ B Altman; Teri E Klein
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Polymorphisms of MTHFR C677T and A1298C associated with survival in patients with colorectal cancer treated with 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Chih-Ching Yeh; Ching-Yu Lai; Shih-Ni Chang; Ling-Ling Hsieh; Reiping Tang; Fung-Chang Sung; Yi-Kuei Lin
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Failure to validate toxicity and outcome biomarkers from the FFCD 2000-05 trial in the MRC CR08 FOCUS trial.

Authors:  Susan D Richman; Jennifer H Barrett; Matthew T Seymour
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Adjuvant pharmacotherapy in the management of elderly patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Raphaël Maréchal; Anne Demols; Jean-Luc Van Laethem
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 7.  DNA damage response pathways and cell cycle checkpoints in colorectal cancer: current concepts and future perspectives for targeted treatment.

Authors:  S Solier; Y-W Zhang; A Ballestrero; Y Pommier; G Zoppoli
Journal:  Curr Cancer Drug Targets       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.428

8.  Gene polymorphisms predict toxicity to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Marjun P Duldulao; Wendy Lee; Rebecca A Nelson; Joyce Ho; Maithao Le; Zhenbin Chen; Wenyan Li; Joseph Kim; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Platinum-induced neurotoxicity and preventive strategies: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Abolfazl Avan; Tjeerd J Postma; Cecilia Ceresa; Amir Avan; Guido Cavaletti; Elisa Giovannetti; Godefridus J Peters
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-03-12

Review 10.  How to select the optimal treatment for first line metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Alexander Stein; Carsten Bokemeyer
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.