Literature DB >> 20385854

Population pharmacokinetics of doripenem based on data from phase 1 studies with healthy volunteers and phase 2 and 3 studies with critically ill patients.

Partha Nandy1, Mahesh N Samtani, Rachel Lin.   

Abstract

A population pharmacokinetic model of doripenem was constructed using data pooled from phase 1, 2, and 3 studies utilizing nonlinear mixed effects modeling. A 2-compartment model with zero-order input and first-order elimination best described the log-transformed concentration-versus-time profile of doripenem. The model was parameterized in terms of total clearance (CL), central volume of distribution (V(c)), peripheral volume of distribution (V(p)), and distribution clearance between the central and peripheral compartments (Q). The final model was described by the following equations (for jth subject): CL(j) (liters/h) = 13.6.(CL(CR)(j)/98 ml/min)(0.659).(1 + CL(race)(j) [0 for Caucasian]); V(c)(j) (liters) = 11.6.(weight(j)/73 kg)(0.596); Q(j) (liters/h) = 4.74.(weight(j)/73)(1.06); and V(p)(j) (liters) = 6.04.(CL(CR)(j)/98 ml/min)(0.417).(weight(j)/73 kg)(0.840).(age(j)/40 years)(0.307). According to the final model, population mean parameter estimates and interindividual variability (percent coefficient of variation [% CV]) for CL (liters/h), V(c) (liters), V(p) (liters), and Q (liters/h) were 13.6 (19%), 11.6 (19%), 6.0 (25%), and 4.7 (42%), respectively. Residual variability, estimated using three separate additive residual error models, was 0.17 standard deviation (SD), 0.55 SD, and 0.92 SD for phase 1, 2, and 3 data, respectively. Creatinine clearance was the most significant predictor of doripenem clearance. Mean Bayesian clearance was approximately 33%, 55%, and 76% lower for individuals with mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment, respectively, than for those with normal renal function. The population pharmacokinetic model based on healthy volunteer data and patient data informs us of doripenem disposition in a more general population as well as of the important measurable intrinsic and extrinsic factors that significantly influence interindividual pharmacokinetic differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20385854      PMCID: PMC2876402          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01649-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  21 in total

Review 1.  Comparative pharmacokinetics of the carbapenems: clinical implications.

Authors:  J W Mouton; D J Touzw; A M Horrevorts; A A Vinks
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Building population pharmacokinetic--pharmacodynamic models. I. Models for covariate effects.

Authors:  J W Mandema; D Verotta; L B Sheiner
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1992-10

Review 3.  Population pharmacokinetics of imipenem in burn patients.

Authors:  Eric Dailly; Marie France Kergueris; Michel Pannier; Pascale Jolliet; Michel Bourin
Journal:  Fundam Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.748

4.  Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine.

Authors:  D W Cockcroft; M H Gault
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.847

5.  Estimation of population characteristics of pharmacokinetic parameters from routine clinical data.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; B Rosenberg; V V Marathe
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1977-10

6.  Comparison of the Akaike Information Criterion, the Schwarz criterion and the F test as guides to model selection.

Authors:  T M Ludden; S L Beal; L B Sheiner
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1994-10

7.  Changes in the plasma clearance and protein binding of carbenoxolone with age, and their possible relationship with adverse drug effects.

Authors:  M J Hayes; M Sprackling; M J Langman
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Comparative studies of the protein binding of digoxin and its metabolites.

Authors:  P H Hinderling
Journal:  Agents Actions       Date:  1977-09

9.  The pharmacokinetics of meropenem in infants and children: a population analysis.

Authors:  E M Parker; M Hutchison; J L Blumer
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of doripenem after 0.5-, 1-, and 4-hour infusions in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Iolanda Cirillo; Nicole Vaccaro; Kenneth Turner; Bhavna Solanki; Jaya Natarajan; Rebecca Redman
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.126

View more
  16 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic-model-guided doripenem dosing in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Mahesh N Samtani; Robert Flamm; Koné Kaniga; Partha Nandy
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Interethnic differences in pharmacokinetics of antibacterials.

Authors:  Danny Tsai; Janattul-Ain Jamal; Joshua S Davis; Jeffrey Lipman; Jason A Roberts
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Optimization of Polymyxin B in Combination with Doripenem To Combat Mutator Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Neang S Ly; Zackery P Bulman; Jürgen B Bulitta; Christopher Baron; Gauri G Rao; Patricia N Holden; Jian Li; Mark D Sutton; Brian T Tsuji
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  The combination of colistin and doripenem is synergistic against Klebsiella pneumoniae at multiple inocula and suppresses colistin resistance in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model.

Authors:  Zakuan Z Deris; Heidi H Yu; Kathryn Davis; Rachel L Soon; Jovan Jacob; Caron K Ku; Anima Poudyal; Phillip J Bergen; Brian T Tsuji; Jurgen B Bulitta; Alan Forrest; David L Paterson; Tony Velkov; Jian Li; Roger L Nation
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Population Pharmacokinetics of Doripenem in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis in a Malaysian Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Mohd H Abdul-Aziz; Azrin N Abd Rahman; Mohd-Basri Mat-Nor; Helmi Sulaiman; Steven C Wallis; Jeffrey Lipman; Jason A Roberts; Christine E Staatz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Sublethal concentrations of carbapenems alter cell morphology and genomic expression of Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilms.

Authors:  Tricia A Van Laar; Tsute Chen; Tao You; Kai P Leung
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Population pharmacokinetics of prophylactic cefoxitin in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Arantxazu Isla; Iñaki F Trocóniz; Ignacio López de Tejada; Silvia Vázquez; Andrés Canut; Jesús Muriel López; María Ángeles Solinís; Alicia Rodríguez Gascón
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling and Simulation of Cefiderocol, a Parenteral Siderophore Cephalosporin, for Dose Adjustment Based on Renal Function.

Authors:  Takayuki Katsube; Toshihiro Wajima; Toru Ishibashi; Juan Camilo Arjona Ferreira; Roger Echols
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Applications of pharmacometrics in the clinical development and pharmacotherapy of anti-infectives.

Authors:  Ashit Trivedi; Richard E Lee; Bernd Meibohm
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.045

10.  Pharmacodynamic variability beyond that explained by MICs.

Authors:  Rachel L Soon; Neang S Ly; Gauri Rao; Lance Wollenberg; Kuo Yang; Brian Tsuji; Alan Forrest
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.