UNLABELLED: Our cross-sectional analysis of 1,576 men aged ≥65 years examined smoking effects on bone status. Number of smoking years was associated with decreased bone mineral density (BMD), after adjusting for age, height, weight, and number of cigarettes smoked daily. Smoking did not affect biochemical marker serum values for bone turnover. INTRODUCTION: The impact of smoking on bone status in men has not been conclusively established. We examined how smoking and its cessation influence bone status and metabolism in men. METHODS: We analyzed 1,576 men among a baseline survey of Japanese men aged ≥65 years, the Fujiwara-kyo Osteoporosis Risk in Men study, conducted during 2007-2008. RESULTS: Lumbar spine (LS) BMD values among never, former, and current smokers were 1.045 ± 0.194, 1.030 ± 0.189, and 1.001 ± 0.182 g/cm(2) (P = 0.005), respectively, while total hip (TH) BMD values were 0.888 ± 0.120, 0.885 ± 0.127, and 0.870 ± 0.124 (P = 0.078), respectively. The significant trend for LS BMD remained after adjusting for the covariates; age, height, weight, physical activity, milk consumption, and drinking habit (P = 0.036). Among never and ever (current and former) smokers, LS and TH BMD decreased with the number of pack years or the number of smoking years, respectively, adjusted for those covariates. Among ever smokers, LS and TH BMD decreased with the number of smoking years after adjusting for age, height, weight, and number of cigarettes smoked daily. Smoking did not reveal significant effect for serum osteocalcin or tartrate resistant acid phosphatase isoenzyme 5b. CONCLUSION: The impact of smoking on bone status is mainly associated with the number of smoking years in elderly men.
UNLABELLED: Our cross-sectional analysis of 1,576 men aged ≥65 years examined smoking effects on bone status. Number of smoking years was associated with decreased bone mineral density (BMD), after adjusting for age, height, weight, and number of cigarettes smoked daily. Smoking did not affect biochemical marker serum values for bone turnover. INTRODUCTION: The impact of smoking on bone status in men has not been conclusively established. We examined how smoking and its cessation influence bone status and metabolism in men. METHODS: We analyzed 1,576 men among a baseline survey of Japanese men aged ≥65 years, the Fujiwara-kyo Osteoporosis Risk in Men study, conducted during 2007-2008. RESULTS: Lumbar spine (LS) BMD values among never, former, and current smokers were 1.045 ± 0.194, 1.030 ± 0.189, and 1.001 ± 0.182 g/cm(2) (P = 0.005), respectively, while total hip (TH) BMD values were 0.888 ± 0.120, 0.885 ± 0.127, and 0.870 ± 0.124 (P = 0.078), respectively. The significant trend for LS BMD remained after adjusting for the covariates; age, height, weight, physical activity, milk consumption, and drinking habit (P = 0.036). Among never and ever (current and former) smokers, LS and TH BMD decreased with the number of pack years or the number of smoking years, respectively, adjusted for those covariates. Among ever smokers, LS and TH BMD decreased with the number of smoking years after adjusting for age, height, weight, and number of cigarettes smoked daily. Smoking did not reveal significant effect for serum osteocalcin or tartrate resistant acid phosphatase isoenzyme 5b. CONCLUSION: The impact of smoking on bone status is mainly associated with the number of smoking years in elderly men.
Authors: N Ortego-Centeno; M Muñoz-Torres; E Jódar; J Hernández-Quero; A Jurado-Duce; J de la Higuera Torres-Puchol Journal: Calcif Tissue Int Date: 1997-06 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: G Theintz; B Buchs; R Rizzoli; D Slosman; H Clavien; P C Sizonenko; J P Bonjour Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 1992-10 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Ahmad M Al-Bashaireh; Linda G Haddad; Michael Weaver; Debra Lynch Kelly; Xing Chengguo; Saunjoo Yoon Journal: J Environ Public Health Date: 2018-07-11
Authors: Ana Maria Rodrigues; Joana Caetano-Lopes; Ana Catarina Vale; Inês Aleixo; Ana Sofia Pena; Alexandra Faustino; Alexandre Sepriano; Joaquim Polido-Pereira; Elsa Vieira-Sousa; Raquel Lucas; José Carlos Romeu; Jacinto Monteiro; Maria Fátima Vaz; João Eurico Fonseca; Helena Canhão Journal: J Bone Miner Metab Date: 2012-08-14 Impact factor: 2.626
Authors: Marc G Vervloet; Arjan D van Zuilen; Annemieke C Heijboer; Piet M ter Wee; Michiel L Bots; Peter J Blankestijn; Jack F M Wetzels Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2012-04-24 Impact factor: 2.388
Authors: Yangmengfan Chen; Romina H Aspera-Werz; Maximilian M Menger; Karsten Falldorf; Michael Ronniger; Christina Stacke; Tina Histing; Andreas K Nussler; Sabrina Ehnert Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Mariëlle W van Ooijen; Melvyn Roerdink; Marga Trekop; Jan Visschedijk; Thomas W Janssen; Peter J Beek Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 3.921