Literature DB >> 20383493

Direction-specific diaphyseal geometry and mineral mass distribution of tibia and fibula: a pQCT study of female athletes representing different exercise loading types.

T Rantalainen1, R Nikander, A Heinonen, H Suominen, H Sievänen.   

Abstract

Bones adapt to prevalent loading, which comprises mainly forces caused by muscle contractions. Therefore, we hypothesized that similar associations would be observed between neuromuscular performance and rigidity of bones located in the same body segment. These associations were assessed among 221 premenopausal women representing athletes in high-impact, odd-impact, high-magnitude, repetitive low-impact, and repetitive nonimpact sports and physically active referents aged 17-40 years. The whole group mean age and body mass were 23 (5) and 63 (9) kg, respectively. Bone cross sections at the tibial and fibular mid-diaphysis were assessed with peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT). Density-weighted polar section modulus (SSI) and minimal and maximal cross-sectional moments of inertia (Imin, Imax) were analyzed. Bone morphology was described as the Imax/Imin ratio. Neuromuscular performance was assessed by maximal power during countermovement jump (CMJ). Tibial SSI was 31% higher in the high-impact, 19% in the odd-impact, and 30% in the repetitive low-impact groups compared with the reference group (P < 0.005). Only the high-impact group differed from the referents in fibular SSI (17%, P < 0.005). Tibial morphology differed between groups (P = 0.001), but fibular morphology did not (P = 0.247). The bone-by-group interaction was highly significant (P < 0.001). After controlling for height, weight, and age, the CMJ peak power correlated moderately with tibial SSI (r = 0.31, P < 0.001) but not with fibular SSI (r = 0.069, P = 0.313). In conclusion, observed differences in the association between neuromuscular performance and tibial and fibular traits suggest that the tibia and fibula experience different loading environments despite their anatomical vicinity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20383493     DOI: 10.1007/s00223-010-9358-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  13 in total

1.  Gradual decline in mobility with the adoption of food production in Europe.

Authors:  Christopher B Ruff; Brigitte Holt; Markku Niskanen; Vladimir Sladek; Margit Berner; Evan Garofalo; Heather M Garvin; Martin Hora; Juho-Antti Junno; Eliska Schuplerova; Rosa Vilkama; Erin Whittey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Age and sex differences in tibia morphology in healthy adult Caucasians.

Authors:  Vanessa D Sherk; Debra A Bemben; Michael G Bemben; Mark A Anderson
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Meagre effects of disuse on the human fibula are not explained by bone size or geometry.

Authors:  A Ireland; R F Capozza; G R Cointry; L Nocciolino; J L Ferretti; J Rittweger
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Effects of a 20-week high-intensity strength and sprint training program on tibial bone structure and strength in middle-aged and older male sprint athletes: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  T H Suominen; M T Korhonen; M Alén; A Heinonen; A Mero; T Törmäkangas; H Suominen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Age and sex differences in estimated tibia strength: influence of measurement site.

Authors:  Vanessa D Sherk; Debra A Bemben
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.617

6.  Differences in tibia morphology between the sound and affected sides in ankle-foot orthosis-using survivors of stroke.

Authors:  Kyle A Sherk; Vanessa D Sherk; Mark A Anderson; Debra A Bemben; Michael G Bemben
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Tibial Bone Strength is Enhanced in the Jump Leg of Collegiate-Level Jumping Athletes: A Within-Subject Controlled Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Alyssa M Weatherholt; Stuart J Warden
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Changes in body composition and bone of female collegiate soccer players through the competitive season and off-season.

Authors:  M M Minett; T B Binkley; L A Weidauer; B L Specker
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.041

9.  Regular Strength and Sprint Training Counteracts Bone Aging: A 10-Year Follow-Up in Male Masters Athletes.

Authors:  Tuuli H Suominen; Markku Alén; Timo Törmäkangas; Hans Degens; Jörn Rittweger; Ari Heinonen; Harri Suominen; Marko T Korhonen
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2021-05-24

10.  Greater Polar Moment of Inertia at the Tibia in Athletes Who Develop Stress Fractures.

Authors:  Lee A Weidauer; Teresa Binkley; Matt Vukovich; Bonny Specker
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2014-07-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.