Literature DB >> 20383336

Ganglioside GM3 levels are altered in a mouse model of HIBM: GM3 as a cellular marker of the disease.

Thomas Paccalet1, Zoé Coulombe, Jacques P Tremblay.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: HIBM (Hereditary Inclusion Body Myopathy) is a recessive hereditary disease characterized by adult-onset, slowly progressive muscle weakness sparing the quadriceps. It is caused by a single missense mutation of each allele of the UDP-N-acetylglucosamine 2-epimerase/N-acetylmannosamine kinase (GNE) gene, a bifunctional enzyme catalyzing the first two steps of sialic acid synthesis in mammals. However, the mechanisms and cellular pathways affected by the GNE mutation and causing the muscle weakness could not be identified so far. Based on recent evidence in literature, we investigated a new hypothesis, i.e. the involvement in the disease of the GM3 ganglioside, a specific glycolipid implicated in muscle cell proliferation and differentiation.
METHODS: qRT-PCR analysis of St3gal5 (GM3 synthase) gene expression and HPLC quantification of GM3 ganglioside were conducted on muscle tissue from a mouse model of HIBM harboring the M712T mutation of GNE (Gne(M712T/M712T) mouse) vs control mice (Gne(+/+) mouse).
RESULTS: St3gal5 mRNA levels were significantly lower in Gne(M712T/M712T) mouse muscles vs Gne(+/+) mouse muscles (64.41%+/-10% of Gne(+/+) levels). GM3 ganglioside levels showed also a significant decrease in Gne(M712T/M712T) mouse muscle compared to Gne(+/+) mouse muscle (18.09%+/-5.33% of Gne(+/+) levels). Although these Gne(M712T/M712T) mice were described to suffer severe glomerular proteinuria, no GM3 alterations were noted in kidneys, highlighting a tissue specific alteration of gangliosides.
CONCLUSION: The M712T mutation of GNE hampers the muscle ability to synthesize normal levels of GM3. This is the first time that a mutation of GNE can be related to the molecular pathological mechanism of HIBM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20383336      PMCID: PMC2850932          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Hereditary Inclusion Body Myopathy (HIBM, OMIM600737, inclusion body myopathy 2, Distal Myopathy with Rimmed Vacuoles) is a unique autosomal recessive muscle disorder, characterized by adult-onset of muscle weakness in upper and lower limbs. Amazingly, the quadriceps seemed to be spared until late stages of the disease [1], [2], although recent evidence suggests that rectus femoris could be affected [3]. HIBM has been originally described in Japanese [4] and Iranian Jews [1] but patients are now found worldwide. HIBM muscle fibres present typical pathology, with rimmed vacuoles and cytoplasmic and/or nuclear filamentous inclusions. Intracellular deposits of β-amyloid proteins, altered phosphorylation of tau or activation of the ubiquitin proteasome or of the lysosomal systems can occasionally be observed [1], [5]–[7]. HIBM was mapped to chromosome 9 [8], [9] and is associated with mutations in the UDP-N-acetylglucosamine 2-epimerase/N-acetylmannosamine kinase (Gne) gene [8]. This gene encodes a bifunctional enzyme (hereafter designed as GNE) catalyzing the epimerisation of UDP-N-acetylglucosamine (UDP-GlcNAc) in N-acetylmannosamine (ManNAc) and then the phosphorylation of ManNAc in ManNAc-6-phosphate (ManNAc-6P). These are the first two steps of N-acetylneuraminic acid (Neu5Ac) biosynthesis [10], the most abundant terminal sialic acid of the eukaryote glycoconjugates. Neu5Ac is implicated in numerous cellular functions, such as cell-cell interactions, signalling, haematopoietic cell differentiation as well as regulation of the immune system [11]–[13]. Knock-out of Gne gene causes embryonic lethality in mice at day 8.5, highlighting the importance of sialylation [14]. GNE activities rely in two functional domains, controlling respectively the epimerase and the kinase activities. Over 40 different mutations spreading over both domains of Gne can cause HIBM. For example, the most prevalent mutations of Gne gene, M712T and V572L respectively in the Middle Eastern community and in Japanese patients, are both located in the kinase domain of GNE, but other mutations have been identified in its epimerase domain. All these mutations of Gne gene result in different altered enzymatic activities [15]–[18], which should lead to lessened status of cellular sialylation or at least reduced sialylation of specific glycoproteins, such as α-dystroglycan [19], [20], NCAM [21], neprilysin [22] or aberrant activity of global systems like lysosomal activity and trafficking [7], [23], [24]. However, the impact of HIBM mutations on the overall sialylation in humans remains unclear [15], [16], [25]. So far, none of these works could identify the molecular pathological mechanism of HIBM and furthermore, a recent model of heterozygous GNE-deficient mice provided clues that cells and organs can manage a certain amount of defects in sialylation, at least down to an overall 25% reduction [26]. Moreover, sialic acids can be provided by exogenous sources and it is known that cells, be it mammalian or insect cell lines, can use circulating sialic acids to compensate their lack of this monosaccharide [16], [27], [28]. The context in which experiments are conducted is thus an important factor in the interpretation of the results. Other studies aimed at discovering cellular processes altered in this myopathy [29]–[31] have not proven anymore successful and the molecular aspects of the disease remain obscure yet. Until now, the process by which mutations of GNE causes the muscular pathology observed in HIBM remains misunderstood. As all the characterized mutations affect differently the enzymatic activity of GNE, but result in similar phenotypes, it is questionable that an altered enzymatic function of GNE triggers the disease mechanism. It is thus possible that HIBM may be a consequence of the alteration of another yet unknown role of GNE. Interestingly, GNE has a dynamic cellular localization, as it can be detected in the cytosol and the nucleus simultaneously [32]. The nuclear localization, which is not required for ManNAc-6P production, suggests alternative roles of GNE, other than the sole pathway of sialic acid biosynthesis. Recently, several articles underlined this hypothesis. GNE was proven to be involved in protein-protein interactions with collapsin response mediator protein 1 (CRMP1) and promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger protein (PLZF)[33], the later being a transcription factor whose knock-out alters musculoskeletal development in mice [34], and with alpha-actinin 1 [35], which helps to anchor the myofibrillar actin filaments. GNE was also reported to regulate ganglioside (sialylated glycosphingolipids) levels in HEK293T cells, especially GM3 and GD3 [36]. In particular, cellular levels of GNE were shown to regulate beta-galactoside alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase 5 expression (ST3Gal5, the GM3 synthesizing enzyme). GM3 is the most abundant ganglioside in muscle, representing almost 70% of total ganglioside in muscle membranes [37]–[40]. Gangliosides, and particularly GM3 and GD3 are involved in regulation of numerous cellular pathways, such as migration, proliferation, senescence and apoptosis [41]–[43] and ganglioside levels change over time in muscle cells, particularly during differentiation [44]–[46]. Thus, an alteration of the capacity of GNE to effectively regulate GM3 synthesis could alter progressively the ability of muscle cells to adapt to their environment or to cope with their needs. To date, no investigation has been made to determine a relation between the ganglioside synthesis regulated by GNE and HIBM. In 2007, two different genetically engineered mouse lines of mutations in the GNE gene were described, harbouring either M712T [47] or D176V [48] mutation. Both of these models aimed at mimicking HIBM phenotype in animals, yet M712T mice mutation lead to glomerular proteinuria, a pathology not described in human HIBM patients. This surprising lethal renal phenotype hindered the authors in their assessment of myopathic features in these mice. However, the M712T strain of mice could still help to understand specific alterations in muscles. In particular, we investigated whether mutations in GNE could alter the GM3 ganglioside levels of muscles and, consequently, the insulin response of muscular cells of M712T mice.

Results

Down-regulation of ST3Gal5 expression in Gne mouse muscle

A recent study [36] pointed out that Gne expression levels were directly able to regulate ST3Gal5 expression levels. ST3Gal5 is the enzyme responsible for ganglioside GM3 synthesis. So far, the possible relationship between GM3 synthesis and HIBM was never investigated, yet GM3 is a glycosphingolipid largely involved in differentiation of muscle cells [44]–[46] and, more generally, in numerous cellular pathways, such as migration, proliferation, apoptosis or insulin sensitivity [42], [43]. Therefore, an alteration of its synthesis could directly lead to a vast modification of the cell metabolism. Thus, it was of interest to test whether a single-nucleotide mutation of Gne gene could modify ST3Gal5 expression pattern. It was first necessary to compare the raw levels of GNE mRNA expression between mutated (Gne) and wild-type (Gne) mouse muscles. As shown in Figure 1a, no difference in GNE mRNA levels could be detected in mice harboring the mutation in regards to Gne mice. This result is consistent with the Gne knock-in construction, where the mutated Gne gene remains under its natural promoter. GNE protein levels in Gne and Gne muscle tissue were assessed by electrophoresis and provided us a complementary verification of comparable GNE levels between Gne and Gne mouse muscles (Figure 2).
Figure 1

Effects of mutated GNEM712T on ST3Gal5 mRNA expression.

A, Comparison of GNE mRNA levels between Gne and Gne mouse muscle determined by qRT-PCR (absolute values are expressed as the number of GNE mRNA copies/µg of total RNA). B, ST3Gal5 mRNA levels Gne and Gne mouse muscle (absolute values are expressed as the number of GNE mRNA copies/µg of total RNA). (*, p<0.025); each data point represents a minimum of 3 replicates). Mean ST3Gal5 expression in Gne muscle was 64.41%±10% of Gne muscle, whereas no significant difference could be detected in GNE expression.

Figure 2

Immunoblotting of muscle of Gne and Gne mice.

Immunoblots of muscle extracts from Gne and Gne showed no apparent difference in GNE protein expression (upper band, arrow, 79 kDa) in Gne mice compared with Gne littermates.

Effects of mutated GNEM712T on ST3Gal5 mRNA expression.

A, Comparison of GNE mRNA levels between Gne and Gne mouse muscle determined by qRT-PCR (absolute values are expressed as the number of GNE mRNA copies/µg of total RNA). B, ST3Gal5 mRNA levels Gne and Gne mouse muscle (absolute values are expressed as the number of GNE mRNA copies/µg of total RNA). (*, p<0.025); each data point represents a minimum of 3 replicates). Mean ST3Gal5 expression in Gne muscle was 64.41%±10% of Gne muscle, whereas no significant difference could be detected in GNE expression.

Immunoblotting of muscle of Gne and Gne mice.

Immunoblots of muscle extracts from Gne and Gne showed no apparent difference in GNE protein expression (upper band, arrow, 79 kDa) in Gne mice compared with Gne littermates. An evaluation of ST3Gal5 mRNA levels was then performed in Gne and Gne muscle tissues by real-time RT PCR. As shown in Figure 1b, St3gal5 gene expression decreased of 35.6%±10% in Gne mice with respect to Gne (p<0.025). This result underlines the role of GNE in the regulation of ST3Gal5 expression.

GM3 ganglioside levels are affected in Gne muscles, compared with Gne muscles

Next, we measured GM3 by HPLC to ensure that changes in ST3Gal5 mRNA levels were reflected in the actual cellular levels of the ganglioside produced by this enzyme. As described in Material & Methods, gangliosides were extracted by several solvent partitions and their oligosaccharides were digested by an endoglycoceramidase. The oligosaccharides were then derivatized with anthranilic acid and analyzed by HPLC, as previously demonstrated [49]. GD1b was used as internal standard, because endogenous GD1b was undetectable in muscle tissue samples (data not shown). Hereafter, ganglioside levels are reported as the ratio of the peak area of GM3 to that of internal standard GD1b (Figure 3). The GM3 levels were significantly lower in Gne muscle than in Gne muscle (18.09%±5.33% of Gne levels, Student t test p = 0.008751).
Figure 3

GNEM712T muscles display changes to GM3 levels.

Gne mouse muscle experienced reduced levels of GM3 gangliosides compared with Gne muscle. HPLC data from a minimum of five replicates are pooled for the Gne and Gne samples (*, p = 0.008751, Student t test).

GNEM712T muscles display changes to GM3 levels.

Gne mouse muscle experienced reduced levels of GM3 gangliosides compared with Gne muscle. HPLC data from a minimum of five replicates are pooled for the Gne and Gne samples (*, p = 0.008751, Student t test).

GM3 ganglioside levels seem unaffected in Gne kidney, compared with Gne

Ganglioside GM3 is particularly abundant in the kidney tissues [50]. Sialic acids are indeed important in kidneys, since their physicochemical properties are involved in the maintenance of the filtration barrier of glomeruli [51]. More particularly, changes in ganglioside expression in these organs is implicated in the pathogenesis of proteinuria [52]. More recently, it was demonstrated that alteration of ganglioside GM3 levels in kidneys can be related to glomerular hypertrophy and proteinuria [53]. However, our results clearly demonstrate that GM3 levels in Gne mouse kidney are comparable with Gne kidney levels (figure 4). Thus, GM3 should not represent an issue in the glomerular nephropathy reported in these mice by Galeano et al. [47].
Figure 4

GNEM712T kidney GM3 levels remain in normal range.

Gne and Gne mouse kidney gangliosides were analyzed by HPLC. No significant difference could be noted. HPLC data from a minimum of 3 replicates is pooled for the Gne and Gne samples.

GNEM712T kidney GM3 levels remain in normal range.

Gne and Gne mouse kidney gangliosides were analyzed by HPLC. No significant difference could be noted. HPLC data from a minimum of 3 replicates is pooled for the Gne and Gne samples.

Discussion

One of the main problems when one tries to unravel the molecular and cellular pathways of HIBM is the lack of human muscle samples. Necessity arose to develop animal models of the mutations in the Gne gene. Two such models were developed to date and this study focuses on one of them, the Gne mice. Gne mouse mutation leads to glomerular proteinuria [47], a pathology not described in human HIBM patients. This surprising lethal renal phenotype hindered the authors in their assessment of myopathic features in these mice. However, this strain of mice could still help us to understand specific alterations in muscle cell metabolism linked to GNE mutations. Galeano et al. [47] previously reported that the majority of these mice did not survive P3. In our colony, in contrast, several homozygous Gne mice lived up to 6 months old. However the Gne mouse phenotype remained altered in comparison with their littermates: Gne mice were smaller than their control littermates, had a high mortality rate before weaning and presented renal abnormalities (data not shown). Moreover, in our colony, no difference could be observed between GNE protein levels of expression, here again in contrast with Galeano et al. Our results demonstrate that in these mice, glycolipid sialylation, in particular ganglioside GM3 synthesis, is also affected. First, the Gne mutation leads to a partial down-regulation of ST3Gal5 mRNA synthesis. However, according to Wang et al[36], when St3Gal5 mRNA levels were decreased to 12–15% of normal mRNA levels, the GM3 ganglioside levels remained 75% of normal levels. Thus, the sole effects of mutated GNEM712T on the mRNA levels of ST3Gal5 (i.e. a decrease of 35.6%±10%) may not translate into such severe changes of GM3 in muscles (roughly 82% of diminution). However, it was reported that in Gne mice, GNEM712T enzyme activity showed only 19.4%±7.5% of GNEWT activity [47]. Hence, the reduction of GM3 may result from a synergy of a lack of sialic acid and a blunt down-regulation of ST3Gal5. Although beyond the scope of this article, these results emphasize the hypothesis formulated by Wang et al. [36] that GNE plays a role in transcription, most probably through its association with transcription factors, as described [33]. Future experiments with Gne mice, a mouse strain harboring another mutation of GNE [48], could help us to determine whether different mutations of GNE all lead to an alteration of ST3Gal5 expression. The rough lack in GM3 ganglioside in Gne mice could have very well explained part of the renal pathologies observed in these animals, according to the relative abundance of GM3 in the kidney tissues [50]. Moreover, it was previously demonstrated that alteration of ganglioside GM3 levels in kidneys can lead to glomerular hypertrophy and proteinuria [53]. However, we could not detect any significant difference between GM3 levels in kidneys of GNEM712T and GNEWT mice. Such results suggest that GM3 alteration related to the GNEM712T mutation could be specific to muscles, and would not affect other organs. This is of primary importance as HIBM patients usually do not develop pathologies in other tissues than muscles. The present work emphasizes the fact that GNE is a moonlighting enzyme, capable of multiple intracellular roles, roles that only recent studies were able to discover [33], [35], [36]. The relationship between mutations of GNE and cellular levels of gangliosides was never explored before. Our results demonstrate that, beyond the production of sialic acid, the synthesis of specific molecules such as gangliosides, could be affected. Among gangliosides, GM3 is of particular interest, due to its preponderance in muscles [39]. Thus, an alteration of GM3 levels in HIBM cells could lead to a variety of detrimental effects and modification of cell metabolism and draw a bridge between several past observations on HIBM cells such as impairment of myogenic terminal differentiation (Amsili et al., personal communication) or modification of the apoptotic signaling pathways [54] as GM3 is precisely involved in terminal differentiation of myoblasts [44] and the control of apoptosis [36], [55]. In the case of muscle, lack of GM3 could not only modify the differentiation of cells but also their insulin related metabolism. Indeed, GM3 expression is directly related to insulin sensitivity [56], [57]. For instance, Type I Gaucher disease, which is due to impaired breakdown of GM3 and its accumulation in macrophages, is also associated with peripheral insulin resistance [58]. An enhanced insulin sensitivity was also reported in mice lacking GM3 [59]. Such modifications of GM3 expression and insulin sensitivity will soon be investigated thoroughly in the other available animal model of GNE mutation, developed by a Japanese team [48], [60] and in human cultured myoblasts. If these different models all confirm that this ganglioside is altered when GNE is mutated, GM3 levels could then be tagged as a cellular marker of HIBM. Perhaps even more valuable, GM3 levels could be followed after genetic correction of myoblasts with healthy Gne gene and permit us to assess the phenotype reparation of cell. This would be the very first preliminary steps toward a cell therapy of HIBM.

Materials and Methods

Animals

The mouse model was produced by Dr Darvish (HIBM Research Group, Encino, USA), referred as Gne mouse, with the most frequent mutation in the GNE gene in Jewish HIBM patients (M712T) is available in our laboratory. Gne and wild-type Gne mice were in C57BL/6 background strain. Animals were used in accordance with the animal protection committee of the CRCHUL. For all the experiments, Gne and Gne mice were paired for age (4 to 6 month old, mean age 5 month old).

Primers

Primers were designed for mouse Gne and St3gal5 (beta-galactoside alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase 5, SIAT9 or GM3 synthase) genes following Wang et al. [36] and adapted for murine genes. Oligonucleotide primer pairs used in this study (table 1) were design by GeneTools software (BioTools), and their specificity was verified by blasting in the GenBank database.
Table 1

Primers used for the analysis of GNE and ST3Gal5 expression by Real-Time PCR.

DesignationDescriptionGenBankSize (bp)Forward primer (5′-3′)/Reverse primer (5′-3′)
Gne N-acetylglucosamine 2-epimerase/N-acetylmannosamine 6-kinaseNM_015828251 TGCCCTTCCTATGACAAACTGCTC/CGCATCACTCGAACCATCTCCT
St3gal5 beta-galactoside alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase 5NM_001035228186 GGTGTTGAGGTGGGAGGAGAG/GATGGACTAGCAGAAAGGGGTTATGAA
Atp5o ATP synthase, H+ transporting mitochondrial F1 complex, O subunitNM_138597142 GCTATGCAACCGCCCTGTACTCTG/ACGGTGCGCTTGATGTAGGGATTC
Hprt1 Hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase 1NM_013556106 CAGGACTGAAAGACTTGCTCGAGAT/CAGCAGGTCAGCAAAGAACTTATAGC
Gapdh Gyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogrenaseNM_008084194 GGCTGCCCAGAACATCATCCCT/ATGCCTGCTTCACCACCTTCTTG
ADNgChromosome 3 genomic contig, strain C57BL/6J (HSD3B1 intron)NT_039239209 CACCCCTTAAGAGACCCATGTT/CCCTGCAGAGACCTTAGAAAAC

Real-Time PCR analyses

The mRNA levels of GNE and ST3Gal5 were analyzed by the quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) method. RNA was isolated from fresh Tibialis anterior tissues (40 mg) using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions from 7 Gne and 3 Gne mouse Tibialis anterior muscles. Five micrograms of total RNA were converted to cDNA by incubation with 200 U SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen), 50 ng random hexamers, 300 ng oligo(dT)18 in a reaction buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 75 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 10 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 0.5 mM dNTPs and 40 U Protector RNase inhibitor (Roche). Reaction was incubated at 25°C for 10 min, then at 50°C for 2 h and followed by treatment with 1 µg RNase A, 37°C, 30 min. PCR purification kit (Qiagen) was used to purify cDNA. cDNA corresponding to 20 ng of the initial total RNA was used to perform fluorescence-based real-time PCR quantification using the LightCycler 480 Realtime PCR apparatus (Roche Diagnostics). The LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master (Roche Diagnostics) was used as described by the manufacturer. The conditions for PCR were denaturation at 95°C for 10 s, annealing at 62°C for 10 s, and elongation at 72°C for 14 s. Reading of the fluorescence signal was taken after heating at 76°C for 5 s, to avoid nonspecific signal and a melting curve was performed to assess nonspecific signal. Annealing temperature was selected based on contamination levels and melting curve results. Prior to mRNA quantification, RNA samples were verified for genomic DNA contamination. To avoid errors due to RNA and cDNA preparation and handling, each result was corrected with three housekeeping genes, subunit O of ATPase (Atp5o), hypoxanthin phosphoribosyltransferase (Hprt1) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Gapdh), at each assay. Calculation of the number of copies of each mRNA was performed according to Luu-The et al. [61]: fit point and second derivative methods were used to determine a Cp that is used to calculate the number of copies of initial mRNA species in the sample using a standard.

Western blot analysis

Proteins from Tibialis anterior muscles were extracted with Total Protein Extraction Kit (Chemicon) according to manufacturer's protocol. Twenty micrograms of proteins were migrated on 8% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred on nitrocellulose membrane. Primary antibody against Gne was provided by D. Darvish [47] and secondary anti-chicken-HRP was from Abcam.

Glycosphingolipid extraction

Thirty milligrams of gastrocnemius muscles of 5 Gne mice and 6 Gne mice were extracted using a modification of the Svennerholm and Fredman method [62] that gave maximum recovery of gangliosides. For each of these mice, three replicates of ganglioside extraction (followed by enzymatic digestion and normal-phase HPLC analysis) were conducted per gastrocnemius muscle, in order to get the most accurate measure of ganglioside levels. Muscle tissues were homogenized with 750 µl of Milli-Q water. The homogenate was poured in 2.7 ml of methanol, stirred and 1.35 ml of chloroform was added. After shaking, mixture was centrifuged at 2000 g for 15 min. Supernatant was kept aside whereas residue was re-extracted by addition of 2.5 ml chloroform/methanol/Milli-Q water (4/8/3), shaking and centrifugation at 2000 g for 15 min. The two extracts were combined and separated in two phases by addition of 1.3 ml Milli-Q water. After centrifugation (2000 g, 15 min), aqueous phase was removed for further processing and organic phase was re-extracted with 750 µl methanol and 500 µl Milli-Q water. After another centrifugation, both aqueous phases were pooled. Chloroform traces were eliminated under a stream of nitrogen before lyophilization of the sample. Purification of gangliosides was obtained by solvent partition in di-isopropylether/1-butanol/Milli-Q water (60∶40∶50, v/v/v), modified and adapted from Ladisch and Gillard [63]. Basically, the samples were resuspended in two volumes (vol) of di-isopropylether/1-butanol (60/40) by vortexing and sonicating. One vol of Milli-Q water and the mixture was then stirred for several minutes. After centrifugation (2000 g, 15 min), the aqueous phase containing the gangliosides was carefully transferred in a new tube using a Pasteur pipet and a reextraction on organic phase was made by addition of 0,5 vol of Milli-Q water. Aqueous phases were combined, traces of organic solvents were evaporated under a stream of nitrogen and the sample was lyophilized. Extracted gangliosides were stored under nitrogen at –80°C in chloroform/methanol (1/1).

Endoglycoceramidase digestion

Total glycosphingolipids from mouse muscle were dried under a stream of nitrogen and then digested with 3 mU of rEGCase II (Takara Bio Inc) in 50 µl incubation buffer (50 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.0, 0,4% TRITON-X100), for 18 h at 37°C. One unit is defined as the amount of enzyme that hydrolyzes 1 µmol of ganglioside asialo-GM1, per minute at 37°C (according to the manufacturer sheet).

Carbohydrate fluorescent labeling and analysis by Normal Phase-HPLC (NP-HPLC)

Oligosaccharides cleaved from gangliosides were derivatized with anthranilic acid, according to Neville et al. [49]. This protocol consists in completing the sample digested by rEGCase II to 60 µl with water. 160 µl of labeling solution (anthranilic acid 30 mg/ml, sodium acetate trihydrate 4% w/v, boric acid 2% w/v and sodium cyanoborohydride 45 mg/ml, in methanol) were then added. The mix was placed at 80°C for 60 min. The reaction was allowed to cool to room temperature before addition of 1 ml acetonitrile/Milli-Q water (97/3, v/v). Purification with Discovery DPA-6S columns was conducted as follows: after pre-equilibration of the column with 2×1 ml acetonitrile, samples were loaded on the column. The column was then washed with 4×1 ml acetonitrile/Milli-Q water (99/1, v/v) and 0.5 ml acetonitrile/Milli-Q water (97/3, v/v). Labeled oligosaccharides were eluted with 2×0.6 ml Milli-Q water and, if needed, stored at –20°C. Before injections, samples were lyophilized and resuspended in Milli-Q water/acetonitrile (2/8, v/v). NP-HPLC of purified labeled oligosaccharides was conducted using a 4.6×250 mm TSK gel amide-80 column (Tosoh Bioscience LLC), on Alliance 2695 Waters System (Milford, MA, USA) coupled with Model 474 Waters fluorescence detector set at Ex_360 nm and Em_425 nm, under control of Empower Waters software. Gradient solvents and analysis conditions were adapted from Neville et al. (2004): solvent A (20% 100 mM ammonium acetate, pH 3.85, in Milli-Q water and 80% acetonitrile) and solvent B (20% 100 mM ammonium acetate, pH 3.85, in Milli-Q water, 60% Milli-Q water, and 20% acetonitrile). Conditions of analysis were: time t = 0 min (t0), 86% solvent A (0.8 ml/min); t6, 86% solvent A (0.8 ml/min); t35, 54,7% solvent A (0.8 ml/min); t37, 5% solvent A (1 ml/min); t39, 5% solvent A (1 ml/min); t41, 86% solvent A (1 ml/min); t55, 86% solvent A (0.8 ml/min). Standard gangliosides such as GM3 or mix of monosialylgangliosides (Matreya LLC) were used to identify peaks.

Statistical tests

Fisher exact test (permutation test) was conducted to assess significant difference between GNE and ST3Gal5 mRNA expression. Student T test was used to compare muscle and kidney GM3 levels of Gne and Gne mouse samples.
  62 in total

1.  Sialylation is essential for early development in mice.

Authors:  Martina Schwarzkopf; Klaus-Peter Knobeloch; Elvira Rohde; Stephan Hinderlich; Nicola Wiechens; Lothar Lucka; Ivan Horak; Werner Reutter; Rüdiger Horstkorte
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Improved real-time RT-PCR method for high-throughput measurements using second derivative calculation and double correction.

Authors:  Van Luu-The; Nathalie Paquet; Ezequiel Calvo; Jean Cumps
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.993

Review 3.  The ganglioside GD3 as the Greek goddess Hecate: several faces turned towards as many directions.

Authors:  Florence Malisan; Roberto Testi
Journal:  IUBMB Life       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.885

4.  Enhanced insulin sensitivity in mice lacking ganglioside GM3.

Authors:  Tadashi Yamashita; Akira Hashiramoto; Martin Haluzik; Hiroki Mizukami; Shoshannah Beck; Aaron Norton; Mari Kono; Shuichi Tsuji; Jose Luis Daniotti; Norbert Werth; Roger Sandhoff; Konrad Sandhoff; Richard L Proia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-03-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Expression of the lysosome-associated membrane proteins in myopathies with rimmed vacuoles.

Authors:  Y Tsuruta; A Furuta; K Furuta; T Yamada; J Kira; T Iwaki
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 17.088

6.  Roles for UDP-GlcNAc 2-epimerase/ManNAc 6-kinase outside of sialic acid biosynthesis: modulation of sialyltransferase and BiP expression, GM3 and GD3 biosynthesis, proliferation, and apoptosis, and ERK1/2 phosphorylation.

Authors:  Zhiyun Wang; Zhonghui Sun; Adrienne V Li; Kevin J Yarema
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-07-17       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  NCAM is hyposialylated in hereditary inclusion body myopathy due to GNE mutations.

Authors:  E Ricci; A Broccolini; T Gidaro; R Morosetti; C Gliubizzi; R Frusciante; G M Di Lella; P A Tonali; M Mirabella
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  A Gne knockout mouse expressing human GNE D176V mutation develops features similar to distal myopathy with rimmed vacuoles or hereditary inclusion body myopathy.

Authors:  May Christine V Malicdan; Satoru Noguchi; Ikuya Nonaka; Yukiko K Hayashi; Ichizo Nishino
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2007-08-18       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Glycosphingolipid biosynthesis during myogenesis of rat L6 cells in vitro.

Authors:  K C Leskawa; R E Erwin; P E Buse; E L Hogan
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.396

10.  GNE protein expression and subcellular distribution are unaltered in HIBM.

Authors:  S Krause; A Aleo; S Hinderlich; L Merlini; I Tournev; M C Walter; Z Argov; S Mitrani-Rosenbaum; H Lochmüller
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  15 in total

1.  GNE Myopathy and Cell Apoptosis: A Comparative Mutation Analysis.

Authors:  Reema Singh; Ranjana Arya
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 5.590

2.  Sialylation of Thomsen-Friedenreich antigen is a noninvasive blood-based biomarker for GNE myopathy.

Authors:  Petcharat Leoyklang; May Christine Malicdan; Tal Yardeni; Frank Celeste; Carla Ciccone; Xueli Li; Rong Jiang; William A Gahl; Nuria Carrillo-Carrasco; Miao He; Marjan Huizing
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.851

3.  Tissue specific expression of sialic acid metabolic pathway: role in GNE myopathy.

Authors:  Kapila Awasthi; Alok Srivastava; Sudha Bhattacharya; Alok Bhattacharya
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 2.698

4.  Oral monosaccharide therapies to reverse renal and muscle hyposialylation in a mouse model of GNE myopathy.

Authors:  Terren K Niethamer; Tal Yardeni; Petcharat Leoyklang; Carla Ciccone; Adrian Astiz-Martinez; Katherine Jacobs; Heidi M Dorward; Patricia M Zerfas; William A Gahl; Marjan Huizing
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 4.797

5.  Quantification of lectin fluorescence in GNE myopathy muscle biopsies.

Authors:  Petcharat Leoyklang; Bradley Class; Satoru Noguchi; William A Gahl; Nuria Carrillo; Ichizo Nishino; Marjan Huizing; May Christine Malicdan
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.217

Review 6.  GNE Myopathy: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Therapeutic Challenges.

Authors:  Nuria Carrillo; May C Malicdan; Marjan Huizing
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 7.  UDP-GlcNAc 2-Epimerase/ManNAc Kinase (GNE): A Master Regulator of Sialic Acid Synthesis.

Authors:  Stephan Hinderlich; Wenke Weidemann; Tal Yardeni; Rüdiger Horstkorte; Marjan Huizing
Journal:  Top Curr Chem       Date:  2015

8.  Non-specific accumulation of glycosphingolipids in GNE myopathy.

Authors:  Katherine A Patzel; Tal Yardeni; Erell Le Poëc-Celic; Petcharat Leoyklang; Heidi Dorward; Dominic S Alonzi; Nikolay V Kukushkin; Bixue Xu; Yongmin Zhang; Matthieu Sollogoub; Yves Blériot; William A Gahl; Marjan Huizing; Terry D Butters
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 4.982

9.  Comparative plasma lipidome between human and cynomolgus monkey: are plasma polar lipids good biomarkers for diabetic monkeys?

Authors:  Guanghou Shui; Jeffrey William Stebbins; Buu Duyen Lam; Wei Fun Cheong; Sin Man Lam; Francine Gregoire; Jun Kusonoki; Markus R Wenk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Implications for the mammalian sialidases in the physiopathology of skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Alessandro Fanzani; Alessandra Zanola; Fiorella Faggi; Nadia Papini; Bruno Venerando; Guido Tettamanti; Maurilio Sampaolesi; Eugenio Monti
Journal:  Skelet Muscle       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 4.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.